Write Down of PPE by 100

May seem like a basic question, but still confused. Let's say PPE is written down by 100. EBIT will decrease by 100, and after tax effect is -60 on NI. Once we move to cash flow statement, we add back the 100, and we have a net change of +40 cash.

But let's just stop and think about it. Does a PPE write off really increase cash? My point of confusion is that we should also take into account the DTA that is created when our book pre tax income is lower than our taxable income. In this case, the DTA created is 40, instead of cash going up by 40.

 

Let me see if I can answer this without even addressing DTA. All these types of questions involving the effect of an additional line item flowing through the financial statements can be misinterpreted in how that will increase/(decrease) cash. Since the income statement and cash flow statement are 'change' statements, meaning they correspond with the transactions that occur over a period (contrasted with the balance sheet which is a position statement), the cash effect answer to these questions is not a change, persay. Rather, it's a 'change in-the-change' of cash over that period.

It seems like an obscure difference, but saying that the net change in cash increased by 40 is not the same as saying your cash increased by 40. The answer to this question is simply suggesting that all else held constant, an additional $100 write-down will decrease earnings, but also means $100 less that taxes will be paid on, such that $40 is saved that would otherwise have been paid in taxes.

So you are absolutely right, cash is not "increasing". Instead, the change in cash is increasing.

 

Best way to think about it is to relate it to depreciation.

If Depreciation were to increase by $10, then:

IS: Pre-tax income down 10 Net Income Down 6

CF: Net Income Down 6 Add back D&A 10 Net Change: 4 (+)

BS: Cash Up 4 PP&E Down 10 (because our fixed assets are "worth" less from Depreciation) Equity Down 6 because of Net Income Balances.

Why do we ADD back Depreciation? Because it is non-cash. What does non-cash mean?? Depreciation was invented by accountants because they needed to find a way to reduce the value of fixed assets over time (since things lose value/usefulness over time). Hence Depreciation was invented - it is an expense. Expenses are subtracted in the income statement as they reduce profitability. Think about it though.. when we create the journal entry (Dr Dep Expense / Cr Acc Dep) we are creating an expense, but we are not actually paying anyone CASH. We are simply recording an expense because we recognize that our fixed assets are decreasing in value. THAT is why we add back, because no money ever left our pockets - it's a pure accounting thing.

Now, onto a $100 write off of PP&E.

Things to note: An ASSET WRITE DOWN = REPORTED AS A LOSS ON IS A LIABILITY WRITE DOWN = REPORTED AS A GAIN ON IS

Therefore, the write down of PP&E is reported as an expense on the income statement which reduces profitability. Why do we ADD BACK the write down? Because we haven't spent any cash per se; we've just recognized that because of some factor, our PP&E are now worth 0, but in essence, we haven't actually "paid" anything. Cash increases due to the amount of money we save on taxes thanks to a reduced taxable income figure - purely mechanical.

Hope this makes sense.

 
Most Helpful

Eaque doloremque esse ducimus non repellat et. Perferendis quidem voluptatem quas qui. Magni et sit saepe cupiditate fuga. Amet reprehenderit omnis et sed quibusdam alias ipsa.

Molestias ut voluptas consectetur asperiores expedita assumenda eveniet impedit. Repellat quam et enim tempora voluptate mollitia.

Quia laboriosam recusandae non eos aut illum enim consequatur. Amet earum aliquid temporibus voluptas perferendis non temporibus. Voluptate est deserunt dicta cupiditate autem reprehenderit dignissimos. Sunt corporis quia ad adipisci.

Sed dolorem laboriosam illo et. Necessitatibus inventore enim ut nobis. Sit asperiores sunt libero esse ipsum quo accusantium molestiae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”