Interview Question: Are you a quantitative or persuasive person?
Retrospectively, I think I should have said that I currently have a comparative advantage in persuasion, but my passion is for quantitative areas of corporate finance, esp. QRM.
Is this a good response if they are looking for a quantitative person?
Or you could say: I don't think the two are mutually exclusive.
Like above stated, the best answer is both.
start off an interview answer with retrospectively if you want to get thrown out a window
For Investment Banking:
Quantitative means you will excel during the first few years in banking, but persuasive means you will excel at the senior level.
I don't think you want to choose a single one, because the question that follows could be a dinger... (ie: a technical curve ball, or high stress sales pitch situation)
What if I answered by reiterating the above statement followed by: "I'm the person you should hire if you are looking for a leader."
I'd just say, "I'm whatever kind of person you want me to be."
How is this even a question? What is it to even be one type of such a person? You should hope to be persuasive enough to get the interviewer to stop asking such inane, idiotic questions.
Voluptate est accusamus ut dolorum possimus et est est. Et pariatur tempore est eum. Soluta molestias et dolor repudiandae sit vitae quis. Saepe fuga consectetur similique alias.
Accusamus qui qui nihil velit occaecati. Voluptates et hic dolores libero molestiae enim possimus. Modi provident illum vel officiis inventore nobis vel.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...