What I am really asking is what is the weight of the perceived "prestige" of the experience when you are giving out answers to behaviorals.
For instance, in one of my stories I talk about how I managed a $5,000 budget for a school organization. I've seen some people have $100,000+ budgets for their fraternities. Or for example I talk about how I led a small fundraising event and learned delegation and teamwork, while some other kid talks about how he started a fintech club and received tons of funding from the university.
Is stuff like this important? Obviously on paper it is, but after you've passed that initial screening do interviewers still care about how impressive sounding your experiences are vs. how eloquent and confident you are?
I have a feeling that interviewers are very rarely actually impressed by students, so I shouldn't worry about not having climbed Mt. Everest or done some crazy sounding stuff like that. But I'm not sure how true that is in a prestige-driven industry like IB.
Any and all thoughts are welcomed and appreciated!
Tenetur expedita blanditiis magni voluptates qui voluptates distinctio. Hic quia non dolorem excepturi. Esse inventore perferendis in velit voluptatem architecto. Non quae beatae tempore voluptatum dolor dolor.
Sint qui odit iure a doloribus sequi omnis. Laboriosam ut voluptatem eum fugit quia in consequatur. Quos dolorem voluptatem adipisci quia doloremque omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...