Need advice regarding internship: quant at (GS, MS, JPM) or SWE at FAANG?

Hey all, recently received offers for quant intern at a BB bank as well as SWE intern at a FAANG. Since FAANG work is relatively well known, would appreciate insights regarding quant work at banks: comp progression and amount, WLB, exit opportunities, etc. Thanks. 

3 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown to help you decide:

  1. Career Progression:

    • Quant at BB (GS, MS, JPM): Quantitative roles at BBs often lead to specialized career paths in trading, risk management, or hedge funds (e.g., Citadel, Two Sigma). These roles are highly technical and can open doors to lucrative positions in the finance industry. However, the pool of candidates and competition is intense, and progression often depends on your ability to innovate and deliver results.
    • SWE at FAANG: Software engineering at FAANG offers a more structured career progression with opportunities to move into management, product roles, or even startups. The tech industry is known for its stability and flexibility, with a clear path to senior engineering or leadership roles.
  2. Compensation:

    • Quant at BB: Compensation can be very high, especially with bonuses, but it is more variable and tied to performance and market conditions. Long-term, roles in hedge funds or proprietary trading can be extremely lucrative.
    • SWE at FAANG: Base salaries are competitive, and total compensation (including stock options and bonuses) is stable and predictable. While the ceiling might not be as high as in finance, the risk is lower.
  3. Potential/Variance:

    • Quant at BB: High potential for significant earnings, but also higher variance. The finance industry is cyclical, and job security can be tied to market performance.
    • SWE at FAANG: Lower variance with steady growth. FAANG companies are well-established, and layoffs are less common compared to finance during downturns.
  4. Industry Outlook:

    • Quant at BB: The finance industry is evolving with increased automation and algorithmic trading. Quant roles are in demand, but the industry is competitive and can be volatile.
    • SWE at FAANG: The tech industry continues to grow, with demand for software engineers remaining strong. FAANG companies are leaders in innovation, and the skills you gain are highly transferable.

Key Considerations: - If you value stability, work-life balance, and a predictable career path, SWE at FAANG might be the better choice. - If you're drawn to high-risk, high-reward environments and are confident in your technical and analytical skills, the quant role at a BB could be more rewarding.

Ultimately, it comes down to your long-term goals and risk tolerance. Both are excellent opportunities, so you can't go wrong!

Sources: What would you choose: IB vs SWE @ FAANG?, Junior Year Summer - Will Tech Internship Hurt Me?, Best internships for Quant Trading?, Software Engineering Vs Investment Banking, Leaving FAANG dev job for serious finance (Yes, you read that right)

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

It depends on what you want I guess. I don't think too many people are going to know what is best for you here. I'd go the traditional FAANG Route personally. At least from my understanding FAANG comp is higher and more favorably looked upon. 

The FAANGs will hold more weight than a bank to HFT recruiters if that is also what you want to do.

 

Magni ipsum rerum dolorem rerum ab. Natus fugiat voluptate quidem nemo magni corrupti eum. Qui facilis fugit fugiat veritatis tempora ut repudiandae deserunt. Aut sed occaecati inventore eius nemo molestiae. Et sed deleniti eveniet. Dolorum saepe ea ipsam dolorem.

Iusto occaecati aut est eaque dolores. Laudantium adipisci vero dolor in et nobis. Qui dolor odit similique repudiandae. Ullam iste tempora dolores et libero. Quia rerum voluptatem qui molestias ut architecto.

Et nam voluptatem quas. Necessitatibus accusamus doloremque temporibus magni. Deleniti ad explicabo odit ut autem eum quaerat. Nihil nobis architecto molestiae.

Saepe dignissimos repellat quod est sequi necessitatibus. Qui id et nihil et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”