reference check help - references by people who've departed?

Going through reference checks right now. How would it be perceived if both references I provide are people who've departed the firm? (neither has a current firm email, so I will provide their personal emails rather than company emails)? 

Should I mention that I'm giving these two people who've just departed as references because I haven't told current people at my firm that I'm leaving and I'm not inclined to because that might affect my bonus being paid out soon? Or should I just give the references, and if they try to push back and ask for other references, I can explain?

Bottom line is, I don't want to seem fishy, but I do very much want to use the two people I trust the most, who happen to both have just left the firm. 

3 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some detailed steps and considerations for handling your reference check situation:

Steps to Handle Reference Checks with Departed Colleagues

  1. Provide Context for Your References:

    • When you submit the references of the two colleagues who have departed, clearly explain why you chose them. Emphasize that they worked closely with you and were leaders on key deals listed on your resume. Highlight their ability to speak to your work performance effectively.
  2. Address the Seniority Concern:

    • If the recruiter specifically asks for senior members (MD-level), you can mention that while these references are not MDs, they were directly involved in your work and can provide detailed insights into your performance. This can sometimes be more valuable than a higher-level reference who may not have worked as closely with you.
  3. Preemptively Explain the Situation:

    • You might want to preemptively explain why you are not using current colleagues as references. You can mention that you haven't informed your current team about your departure due to the upcoming bonus payout. This shows transparency and helps the recruiter understand your situation.
  4. Be Prepared for Pushback:

    • If the recruiter insists on having references from current senior members, be prepared to explain your reasoning again. You can also suggest that they contact your former colleagues first and then decide if they still need additional references.
  5. Maintain Professionalism:

    • Throughout the process, maintain a professional tone and ensure that your reasons are clearly communicated. This will help in avoiding any perception of being "fishy."

Key Points to Communicate

  • Close Working Relationship: Emphasize that the references you provided worked closely with you and can give a detailed account of your contributions and performance.
  • Recent Departure: Mention that these colleagues have only recently left the firm, so their insights are still relevant and up-to-date.
  • Bonus Consideration: Explain that you haven't informed current colleagues about your departure due to the upcoming bonus payout, which is a common concern in the industry.

Example Explanation to Recruiter

"Thank you for your understanding regarding my references. The two individuals I have listed worked very closely with me on key deals and can provide detailed insights into my performance. They have recently left the firm, which is why I am providing their personal contact information. I have not informed my current team about my departure due to an upcoming bonus payout, and I hope this context helps in understanding my choice of references. If you need further clarification or additional references, please let me know."

By following these steps and clearly communicating your reasons, you can effectively manage the reference check process while maintaining your professional integrity and protecting your bonus payout.

Sources: Urgent: PE Offer after being fired, Being Fired and being upfront about it, Burned Out - Quitting w/o an offer?, Private Equity Reference Check, We need to let you go

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Magnam consequatur repellat et omnis nostrum. Vel ea laborum eum maiores nihil assumenda et. Qui quod maxime maiores facere excepturi labore aut.

Aut quis iusto odit dolorem minima qui. Cum dicta quisquam qui pariatur. Ab quia quos in. Eum autem voluptas consequatur a dolores. Illum odio et aut et sed.

Et placeat aut sint similique consequatur. Velit nihil voluptas quia vitae ipsam quidem. Aut officia iusto et et ea eius facilis. Rem voluptas ea quis veritatis in fugit expedita.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”