Switch to Tech?

Monkeys, not to belabor the topic of switching to tech and becoming a SWE / PM, but am seriously considering it.


Currently an analyst in M&A. For background, I was part of a engineering/business crossover program where I studied CS and Finance. From the program, was around 50/50 split between those entering tech vs IB or other finance role after undergrad. 


Have noticed that my friends in tech are much happier. Better WLB, better culture, free time outside of work, and more challenging work when they are working. Thinking long term I'd want to switch into a tech-adjacent role, is there a benefit to grinding it out for 2 years in IB and then 2 on the buy side first or just switch now? 


Has anyone else made this switch from finance to tech and/or become a SWE?

 

IB and tech are fairly mutually exclusive so if you want to switch, do it now

Grass isn't always greener though, and you're considering the worst part of the whole finance career (IB stint) - it's fine if the work in tech is better fit for you, but you seem to be switching over in search of better WLB and other soft factors you can find in finance-related careers as well. Reflect on whether you like the day to day of tech or finance better - do you like financials / lots of group meetings, or are you happier working on code and mostly sitting by yourself throughout the day>

 

Thanks for bringing up those points. My thoughts are at some point in my career I’d like to switch to a 9-5 more or less with respectable comp. I look at the seniors who I work with, and while I respect them they don’t have the WLB I’d strive for at that age.

 

There are very solid 9-5s to be had in finance and still make good money. AM, IR, corp dev/strat, credit etc

SWE often tops out around the $400-500k range, so make sure you're looking at it over a career. Finance jobs will scale even if the ASO number is $200k or less for some corp jobs, SWE could start higher but may not grow past a certain dollar amount

Not to say finance is the end all be all, but I would not extrapolate IB hours/lifestyle as representative of all of finance if you otherwise like the type of work you do

 

Up to you! I'm one of those in belief that tech will eventually bounce back. Although, who knows how slow the tech hiring market or how frequent layoffs will be for the forseeable future. Early 2000s (2001 - 2003) tech job market after the dot-com bubble was really bad and mass layoffs were happening. I think the current market compares to that time period. 

 
Most Helpful

Hey - I studied Computer Science and now work as a Quant Dev in a bank, and had experience working at IBM, Google, and Microsoft as an intern. I've graduated in 2018 and most of my friends work in tech, so I can share my experience.

I personally find my WLB in the bank to be better than my friends who work at FAANG (Disclaimer, I work in Toronto - so the grind at FAANG here isn't as bad as SF or Seattle) - I rarely work past 5, and the pace is a bit slower but mostly because most quant applications are hundreds of thousands of C++ code in a monolith architecture and take 30-45 minutes to recompile/build from scratch...so I get a "free break" other than my lunch break everyday where I can catch up with my colleagues or go for a walk whenever I need to build. I would say the WLB is comparable to Uber, Reddit, Square and similar firms just below FAANG

The comp is quite good, and almost exactly the same as my friends in Microsoft, and a tad higher than IBM (Comparing to Team Lead SDE) - it is about 10% lower than Google (could be more factoring their HQ is in Waterloo and I work in Toronto, which is a lot more expensive), however, I get pretty sick benefits such as a big discount on my mortgage rate because I got it through my bank, cheaper car and home insurance, a great pension plan, and any other product that we offer to consumers.

My advice - before looking into tech, maybe speak to some of the Quant Devs/Software Devs in your bank and see how their teams are...you're probably at a much bigger advantage to get hired there since it would be an internal move. 

Do I get bothered when I see some of these "Bank Dev" comments online? Not really, I enjoy the work I am doing, I think my pay is pretty good, I get to work with some of the smartest PhDs I've ever met and some of them are Quantitative Finance professors/instructors at some of the best universities in the world...

One more thing - when we had layoffs over the past year, the front office developers were pretty much untouched, so job security is relatively great compared to other areas of the bank and tech firms. Piece of advice, if you're going to tech don't become a PM. Very looked down upon, and they get paid way less than developers especially after you make it to Senior / SDE II.

 

PM in tech = Project or Product Manager, not Portfolio (Apologies if you already knew that)

Yes - Unless you're a back office PM managing an offshore team in India who is building a reconciliation tool, you have little to no value working with front office quants or devs. We can speak to S&T, understand what they need, build it out, and even make slide decks ourselves. No need for a middle man. 

Speaking for my firm and my other friends who have similar roles, we get paid more than PMs in general, even ones who are ahead in terms of rank. 

 

Think a good point to be raised is whether finance (buy side specifically) is becoming oversaturated as you get more senior. At most established funds there’s little to no room to become a VP+.

How does that compare to tech? Is there a similar funnel where it’s increasingly difficult to become a managing position / L6+ level?

 

Fuga aut dolorem eos omnis aspernatur neque. Vel officia culpa iste iure. Delectus voluptatem nemo earum unde corrupti. Nihil similique sint at maiores quo.

Inventore hic aut consequuntur aspernatur possimus tenetur qui. Doloribus ut architecto et accusamus. Aliquid nesciunt necessitatibus impedit rerum dolorem architecto quibusdam.

Expedita nostrum aspernatur vitae magni quas ut. Eius natus consectetur aut voluptas placeat voluptatibus. Dolores error et dolores aut nesciunt consequatur nihil. Voluptatem maxime natus et expedita. Doloremque consequatur aspernatur magni assumenda sed repudiandae praesentium. Sed placeat qui voluptatem ad labore. Numquam ut error autem sunt consequatur nihil velit nostrum.

Quos molestiae non atque architecto distinctio et. Cumque assumenda beatae expedita ex.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”