23 Comments
 

This is why he said it:

On Thursday, after the White House released an analysis showing that the wealthiest 400 households in the U.S. paid an effective federal income tax rate of about 8.2% if unrealized capital gains are treated as income, Wyden spoke in favor of his tax proposal.

 
Most Helpful

Does it matter to you that this is a totally fake stat? They use capital gains/unrealized capital gains to argue that these people are paying a low tax rate. So when your $400,000 house appreciates $20,000 year over year, according to Joe Biden's fake stats, you got a tax break for not paying tax on the unrealized $20,000 gain.

Array
 

The point of this bill is to pay for the $3.5T infrastructure bill that Biden is trying to pass.

To that extent, I think it is extremely flawed that we do not have accountability measures for the government, like the private sector. None of these politicians would last a day on the job in any company.  

Array
 

The 16th Amendment gives the Federal government the "power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived." Well then, what is income? According to Eisner v. Macomber, one of the most important tax law cases of all time,

"Income may be defined as the gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined, including profit gained through sale or conversion of capital. P. 252 U. S. 207.

Mere growth or increment of value in a capital investment is not income; income is essentially a gain or profit, in itself, of exchangeable value, proceeding from capital, severed from it, and derived or received by the taxpayer for his separate use, benefit, and disposal. Id."

Mere growth is not income, which is why stock dividends were found to be generally nontaxable under Macomber. While there are cases that limit the Macomber decision like Helvering v. Bruun, that case was about a lease improvement that reverted to a landlord, which while no cash was involved, there was a benefit that was changing hands, so it made sense to make those sorts of things taxable. This proposed law goes against two important principles of taxation: 1) the taxpayer must have the wherewithal to pay and 2) the "income" that is to be taxed must truly be income. This proposition takes a hot steaming dump all over a century's worth of tax law. It's dead on arrival.

If that isn't enough, then think about the enormous advantages that would accrue to private companies if this provision were only to apply to publicly traded corporations. If this provision does apply to privately held corporations, then how would unrealized capital gains be taxed except through the most byzantine valuation regulations imaginable? If the taxpayer has realized no cash, how are they supposed to pay for these things? Sell fractional amounts of the company to outsiders? Take on debt?

 
kellycriterion

Mere growth is not income, which is why stock dividends are generally nontaxable. 

Cash dividends should not even be taxable.  As an investor, you are getting no extra value when you get a cash dividend because the stock price drops by the amount of the dividend.  You could make a good argument that cash dividends detract from your value as an investor because they are taxable.  Fortunately, most cash dividends are qualified these days, which results in a lower tax burden than it was previously when they were taxed at ordinary income rates.  

 

I don't support your position on cash dividends. Cash dividends are realized in cash. If your stock position is at a gain, then the cash dividend is the realization of an economic capital gain. If the position is neutral or at a loss, then you could sell the position after receiving the dividend and still be tax-neutral.*

In any case, you've realized cash there, which is an important element for the IRS. This unrealized provision involves... no realization.

* This ignores STCG vs. LTCG and the $3K annual loss limitation for individual taxpayers. All comments assume that dividends are qualified rather than ordinary.

 

I will disagree on dividends.

What freaks me out is having to tell investors that they need to pay short term cap gains because one of my ETFs rebal'd  I'm not ok with that.

The only difference between Asset Management and Investment Research is assets. I generally see somebody I know on TV on Bloomberg/CNBC etc. once or twice a week. This sounds cool, until I remind myself that I see somebody I know on ESPN five days a week.
 

Overall, I think that unrealized gains should not be taxed.  There is no assurance that the unrealized gain will stay as a gain.  What if the stock market falls and your gain disappears.  You could have losses and a tax burden at the same time.   

 

I can’t understand how these politicians cannot get their sh*t together.

Can’t they just leave the upper middle class alone? If you make 20mm or less a year, absolutely zero increase in tax.

Want to pay for your pork barrel nonsense? Figure out a way to tax the Uber rich for god sake. How about every dollar you make over 50mm gets taxed at 70% or something.

Why do the upper middle class have to get screwed over constantly.

 

I agree with this sentiment.  There have to be better ways to increase tax revenue. A small extra tax on the super high income earners will not have much of a negative impact on the economy while achieving the goal of increasing tax revenue

 

Before all of you complain, this is 100% DOA.  Aside from it being a blatant violation of established tax law, it is also not going to fly for political reasons.  The biggest in kind donors to the current administrations party are major tech companies whose leaders are sitting on hundreds of billions of dollars of unrealized gains. This will do three things.  One it will directly financially impact these individuals, two it will dilute their power in their companies, and three it will open up these companies to hostile takeovers from activists investors who may have very different political leanings.  

This entire lark is an attempt to drum up the base going into the 2022 elections.  Now that doesn't mean the idiot in the White House won't just try to do this through an executive order.  Because despite spending as much time as he did in congress, he seems to be completely unaware of how the legslative process works.

 

Fuga consequatur vel possimus. Voluptas non sunt quo sit eveniet laborum. Ipsa sit non qui consectetur quas deserunt incidunt. Ipsam aut explicabo et nulla provident sed maiores a. Placeat beatae voluptas maiores quasi ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”