Enjoy,
the first episode:Billions, Season 3, Episode 1: Tie Goes to the Runner. Chuck gets a mandate from a new boss. Axe braves a difficult choice following his indictment. Taylor generates a monster strategy. Lara threatens to pull her money from Axe Capital. Sacker strives to prove herself. Season premiere.
| +33 | How do we get as sharp as possible? | 11 | 3d |
| +23 | What do you think of tiktoker Jinginvests | 9 | 16h |
| +19 | Alcoholism | 4 | 3d |
| +15 | Upselling yourself when you’re unqualified | 2 | 3d |
| +14 | How Are Cornell 7 / GC Members Affecting Your Bank or Firm? | 5 | 4d |
| +11 | Del | 2 | 2d |
| +10 | PWP Piper deal terminated, ruined my chances with a girl | 4 | 1d |
| +2 | Being able to DnD is God Mode | 3 | 3h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
My hatred for Lara amplified about 100 when I saw her with Birch.
Shes so basic
My favorite was Axe's "You weren't ready" speech to her after her IV bag idea. Lol
Taylor is an annoying character
Chuck is a cuck
agreed
Taylor is the SJW weaving their tid bit into the show.
The shit she says isn't even intelligent. I mean to the average audience it does sound smart, but for someone like myself who follows finance closely, and someone for you who has a role in FO finance, its pretty basic. The SJW side gives me the shits because I doubt there are many delusional people who don't know what gender they are making big calls in Hedge Funds. I hope she doesn't take a larger role than Axe
Annoying + ugly = letal mix
Anyone else noticed this guy at the dinner near the end? https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/business/bank-of-america-sexual-m…
Lol. The irony
Meh that wasn't really that great of an episode tbh, it was cool that Marc Lasry was in it though lol
to be honest, was a bit disappointed with the first episode of season 3 mainly due to the huge hype it had. we needed more axlerod action but that was clearly replaced by taylor. -_-
Agreed. I'm curious where it's headed. If Axelrod gets off and the investigation ends, what happens? We go back to essentially what was happening in Season 1 before the investigation started? Or maybe it'll be like Suits and we follow Axelrod around in prison for a little. They both seem unlikely.
Totally agree. I feel like they're changing the show to be more predictable and universally marketed. The show did so well initially because it was a serious show that had a strong financial "cool factor" but I can see it changing
Anyone else find the scenes with Paul Giamatti and Maggie Siff EXTREMELY off putting. You know what scenes I'm talking about.
To go further, does anyone understand how that dynamic works, specifically on the show or in general. I don't want to judge, but it just isn't my cup-o-tea, so I can't fathom.
It was definitely awkward this time around.
As far as why, I remember Wendy mentioning something the first season along the lines of "...this helps keep you in the present." There was a study done talking about how BDSM can help reduce stress/anxiety as well.
Definitely not my thing either though.
I haven't started Season 1 yet, I need to though.
Brilliant start to the new season.
..and Chuck is a big pu**y, btw.
I liked that scene in Veselka where Chuck is slurping that egg cream. I’ll have to try that next time I’m there
I hope they feature more nyc restaurants and cafes in each episode, similar to Master of None
Also whenever Charles or Jack are on, they’re always in various rooms of the Yale Club. So unbelievably pretentious, very effective in highlighting their characters
Wendy and Bryan remain my favorite characters, though Dake is starting to get interesting with the moral dilemmas he’s grappling with
I definitely agree with some of the comments of wanting to see more of Axelrod instead of Taylor. Lara is indeed a bitch. Wendy is whatever, curious to see how Chuck handle his marriage knowing that she slept with another guy in season 2 during their separation. Finally, my boy Wags is still funny as fuck.
the yenta's Psychology Today know-it-all huckster schtick is so fucking tiresome and boring. and while she's not a dime, it's so ridiculously unrealistic she'd ever touch that slob husband to the point it's just painful to watch. I'll keep watching hoping Chuck eventually has his Rod Blagojevich moment
also hate the white trash sass-box (ex) wife. Bobby needs some young puss. start nailing NYU or Columbia co-eds
Wendy's shift in position in ep 2 was very interesting though. In previous seasons she was hesitant to help Chuck or even discuss his work, but she was helping Chuck to confront Judge Fund. Pretty interesting transitioning. While like many I thought Ep 1 was pretty underwhelming, Ep2 was surely more exciting.
Svengali yenta psychologist ruling over every main and under-plot is the most annoying part of the show, by far. It's like if the therapist Tony saw in the Soprano's became the star of the series. Enough already.
How'd you guys like episode 7 tonight? What an ending this week.
Haven't seen it yet, too busy partying with 200 supermodels.
Ending was sick.
Est ut porro voluptatem molestiae. Voluptatem mollitia voluptatem ipsa ullam voluptatem incidunt sequi. Aut sed et unde pariatur a. Possimus illo quam non voluptatem rem laborum qui.
Sed sit velit sed. Et laboriosam voluptates similique et. Necessitatibus voluptatem nihil qui architecto et. Possimus dolores accusantium laboriosam omnis voluptas officiis.
Aut velit officiis amet libero beatae. Unde ad debitis quaerat fuga et. Eum laborum ut consequatur labore. Voluptatem ab minima libero. Pariatur qui pariatur blanditiis adipisci.
Qui molestias illum aut commodi. Aut nemo et et rerum molestiae praesentium. Maiores ipsum deserunt laboriosam alias et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Exercitationem est possimus sint et eligendi. Fugiat fugit rerum blanditiis quia. Aut rerum voluptas modi deserunt. Nemo distinctio quas enim illo ut et nihil. Rerum et est qui magni ea voluptatem. Odio sint minima molestiae aut atque aut minus. Sunt dolorem necessitatibus rerum est.
Voluptatem inventore repudiandae unde similique rem enim natus hic. Ut officiis est et ut a voluptate. Fugit eligendi dolorum eum earum nemo quibusdam.
Explicabo enim dolores aspernatur alias. Eveniet rem voluptatem veniam exercitationem. Accusamus eos laborum quis.
Molestias aperiam corrupti molestias ut. Minima neque aliquid ex culpa fugiat quod. Praesentium adipisci excepturi inventore saepe.