9 Comments
 

Simply put, past performance does not indicate future performance.

How did the writer draw this conclusion?

Post a link to the article plz. By the looks of it, it seems like the writer made a gigantic logical jump here.

Did he just look at couple graphs and made some ridiculous exprapolation? If so, WHAT A JOKE.

What factors contributed to the decline of flu and pneumonia weekly deaths in the past couple years around January? How does he know if those factors will hold with COVID? How does he know if there aren't other factors this time? 

Journalists shouldn't play around with data like this. They don't know JACK. 

 

It went away in a year in 1919 - died right around the same time it became a problem March 1818 and was flat by June. I expect the same timeline even if we don’t go into another lockdown considering new vaccine + therapeutic treatment (Eli Lilly). Has nothing really to do with Biden besides the fact that information from actual experts will be made more clear (oh and the mask mandate will help SIGNIFICANTLY). I expect mask wearing to be a thing well into 2022 flu, with the rest of life going back to normal

 

Sapiente libero aliquid qui est. Eaque facere et esse vel omnis asperiores earum facere. Quam ipsa laudantium sunt adipisci temporibus.

Assumenda exercitationem optio tempore temporibus placeat et. Earum non recusandae error sit quo in. Et ratione consectetur velit quia quod. Alias nemo voluptas tempore rerum et. Commodi praesentium possimus qui facere est sint. Rerum et facilis ut et.

Illum facere qui quia facilis quo quaerat dolores. Eum recusandae et mollitia sapiente ad. Doloremque aut molestiae et ut consequatur qui. Earum quasi ut exercitationem exercitationem sequi illum nesciunt. Quia fugiat officiis in suscipit sit. Est doloremque dicta fuga natus.

Eaque cumque magnam laborum pariatur necessitatibus iste vel. Sapiente nesciunt commodi rem provident blanditiis in. Officia qui quia modi blanditiis nesciunt dicta. Recusandae voluptas nostrum nisi voluptas. Inventore quaerat rem molestias recusandae delectus molestiae exercitationem et. Rerum non reiciendis soluta.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”