Current recruiting is crap

Hi guys,
I'll graduate soon and I think that the whole recruiting process is crap (bullshit cover letter, clueless HR...).
If you could redesign the whole process of recruiting, how would you do it?
I am deeply interested in your suggestions!
Cheers!!!

 

Aptitude tests for every position. Fuck disparate impact. No bullshit behavioral/"fit" interviews. Higher barriers to application submission at top firms, to eliminate the problem of "I have a massive pile of resumes, so I'll just pick out the people I know."

 
obscenity:
Aptitude tests for every position. Fuck disparate impact. No bullshit behavioral/"fit" interviews. Higher barriers to application submission at top firms, to eliminate the problem of "I have a massive pile of resumes, so I'll just pick out the people I know."

so, are you indian, or asian?

 
melvvvar:
obscenity:
Aptitude tests for every position. Fuck disparate impact. No bullshit behavioral/"fit" interviews. Higher barriers to application submission at top firms, to eliminate the problem of "I have a massive pile of resumes, so I'll just pick out the people I know."

so, are you indian, or asian?

Nope.
Then should firms do away with technical questions as well? I mean they're completely BS considering you learn everything in training anyways, right?

I don't think there's too much wrong with current recruiting practices.

Fit questions don't have anything to do with your ability to do the job. You're suggesting that people don't ask questions that are directly related to their existing knowledge about the job. If you learn everything in training, why even have finance/econ/accounting majors?
Oreos - My point is after resume screening by HR and senior people, almost everyone at a superday can hack the technicals, so they reveal a lot less. I'm also not a fan of brainteasers as revealing much about a person's job performance (I do like them generally as fun puzzles). The behavorial/fir questions are, in my mind, paramount because you are going to be working with this guy/girl for potentially a very long time, pulling all nighters together, and spending a way more time together than most colleagues in other industries. You need to figure out who they are and how they work, and I don't think you can get that from "How XYZ transaction affect the three statements?"
Maybe HR should stop hiring people who are so unprofessional they can't work with someone unless they have some ridiculous interest like "Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu" in common.
 
obscenity:
Aptitude tests for every position. Fuck disparate impact. No bullshit behavioral/"fit" interviews. Higher barriers to application submission at top firms, to eliminate the problem of "I have a massive pile of resumes, so I'll just pick out the people I know."

Then should firms do away with technical questions as well? I mean they're completely BS considering you learn everything in training anyways, right?

I don't think there's too much wrong with current recruiting practices.

 

in theory I think this would be best: 4-6 week trial unpaid "boot camp" for all interested candidates who meet some minimum criteria. Emphasis on meritocracy & only the fittest survive, those who want it the most and are best at the job will rise to the top.

obvious managerial / space / logistical problems arise, but maybe some larger firms could manage this. kindve like having a minor league squad

WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.
 
TheKid1:
arnaudm:
Hi guys, I'll graduate soon and I think that the whole recruiting process is crap (bullshit cover letter, clueless HR...). If you could redesign the whole process of recruiting, how would you do it? I am deeply interested in your suggestions! Cheers!!!

You dont have a job yet?

I already have a job offer at a startup in the Silicon Valley. I just think that the paradigm of cover letter + resume + BS personal questions is outdated. I'd love to know other ways to assess new graduates.

 
arnaudm:
TheKid1:
arnaudm:
Hi guys, I'll graduate soon and I think that the whole recruiting process is crap (bullshit cover letter, clueless HR...). If you could redesign the whole process of recruiting, how would you do it? I am deeply interested in your suggestions! Cheers!!!

You dont have a job yet?

I already have a job offer at a startup in the Silicon Valley. I just think that the paradigm of cover letter + resume + BS personal questions is outdated. I'd love to know other ways to assess new graduates.

Attractiveness. Ability to replicate a posh british accent. Curling skills.

 

Should be an initial round of blind (i.e. no CV) speed dating (5/10 mins) interview to those who meet certain standards which should be simple hurdle rates of academics (as lets face it we have no other easy metric).

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

I like the idea of a blind/no CV technical and fit interview to weed out people who obviously have no place working in IB. I think it would even the playing field quite a bit, and would get people hired who are actually good at the things important to being an analyst. You don't need a 3.8 from an Ivy to be good at this job, and a lot of times those people are the worst ones for this job.

 
Boothorbust:
Getting rid of behavorial/fit questions would be a DISASTER.

Why? You can't hack technicals?

But I see what you're getting at, you'd just get robots who can spew out tech answers. But, in my opinion, if you can't judge someone by how they answer any question, technical or otherwise, you shouldn't be interviewing people.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Oreos - My point is after resume screening by HR and senior people, almost everyone at a superday can hack the technicals, so they reveal a lot less. I'm also not a fan of brainteasers as revealing much about a person's job performance (I do like them generally as fun puzzles). The behavorial/fir questions are, in my mind, paramount because you are going to be working with this guy/girl for potentially a very long time, pulling all nighters together, and spending a way more time together than most colleagues in other industries. You need to figure out who they are and how they work, and I don't think you can get that from "How XYZ transaction affect the three statements?"

 
Best Response
Boothorbust:
Oreos - My point is after resume screening by HR and senior people, almost everyone at a superday can hack the technicals, so they reveal a lot less. I'm also not a fan of brainteasers as revealing much about a person's job performance (I do like them generally as fun puzzles). The behavorial/fir questions are, in my mind, paramount because you are going to be working with this guy/girl for potentially a very long time, pulling all nighters together, and spending a way more time together than most colleagues in other industries. You need to figure out who they are and how they work, and I don't think you can get that from "How XYZ transaction affect the three statements?"

And you think those questions are answered by: Interviewer: "tell me about a time you lead a team" Interviewee: yes, i'm so glad i bought that BIWS interview guide, time to regurgitate my prepared answer/STAR analysis "In my junior year I was team leader......"

if you want to answer those questions it's better to meet for a beer, see if the guy annoys you in a less formal/forced environment.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

I'm talking less about the "Tell me about a time you led a team?" type questions and more about the questions about what your interests are, why finance, why banking (or whatever), describe things on your resume, tell me a joke, etc. Just generally being able to talk to someone without being nervous or awkward. HR can't screen for these types of things in resumes and technicals won't get you very far.

In any case I don't know why you'd argue against these types of questions. Even if you think they don't add anything to the recruiting process (and I think they do), the certainly don't detract. I just don't see the harm.

 
Boothorbust:
In any case I don't know why you'd argue against these types of questions. Even if you think they don't add anything to the recruiting process (and I think they do), the certainly don't detract. I just don't see the harm.

I'm glad that most of the questions I got asked this recruiting season were about my interests section of my resume.

Well, I only had 1SA offer, so take it with a grain of salt.

 

Quo a dolores nihil voluptatem velit. Ut incidunt quisquam ratione ut odio quaerat perferendis. Ea molestiae facilis ex et. Exercitationem fuga accusantium aut possimus et iste in. Earum ullam sunt voluptatum. Quia est aut quaerat. Hic praesentium necessitatibus repellat repellendus corporis sunt.

Delectus consequatur cumque reiciendis ipsum. Id nostrum consequatur ut omnis atque. Rem dolor magnam mollitia officiis eveniet exercitationem sed harum. Repellendus dolorum sed culpa magnam nihil.

Voluptates placeat rerum reiciendis et atque nulla. Architecto impedit accusantium veritatis omnis maiores minima eligendi. Sapiente explicabo doloribus dolore ratione.

Sapiente est aut doloremque rerum itaque error suscipit. Tempora ipsam omnis voluptate qui repudiandae dolores earum. Esse id aut aut et enim reiciendis facilis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”