Demystifying the CPA Exam and Designation

There’s been a couple of threads that have popped up lately about the CPA exam and whether it would be worth it for the authors try and pass it in lieu of other things, or in their spare time. Some of the comments by other posters lead me to believe there’s a lot of misinformation or misconceptions about what a CPA actually is. I think it would be helpful to put some information out there to refer to later, as I feel these misconceptions might lead people away from the best path to achieving their goals.

This post is a mixture of my personal experiences as well as a lot of research on the subject, but seeing as there are other accountants/CPAs on this forum, I should note that this is based on my own personal view, and as such might differ from other posters’ opinions.

So here we go

1. Passing the CPA exam makes me a CPA.

No. When people usually refer to a CPA (as an individual) they are referring to someone who is licensed by their state board of accountancy as a certified public accountant. While they do have to pass the CPA exam, there are other requirements that you have to meet in order to be a CPA. The main one that many outside of public accounting have issues meeting is the experience requirement, which is generally 1 or 2 years under the supervision of another CPA. If you’re going into investment banking, a hedge fund, private equity, or other front office finance roles, the chance that you’ll be working under another licensed CPA is remote, hence why it’s pretty much pointless to try and become a licensed CPA in those roles. And just like the CFA designation, just because you've passed the CPA exam does not mean you can go around calling yourself a CPA. That’s a big no-no.

2. Passing the CPA exam shows that I’m good at accounting.

Not necessarily. The CPA exam covers a HELL of a lot of information, and most of it not financial accounting related.
The CPA exam is broken into four parts: REG, BEC, AUD, and FAR. Out of these, the only ones that are semi-relevant for finance positions are BEC and FAR. REG covers taxation and business law, both of those you’ll probably leave to your firm’s own lawyers and tax accountants. AUD covers how to audit financial statements, which seems like it might be helpful, but only covers things like sampling a population or what materiality is. Again, this role will be left to your firm’s internal and external auditors.

BEC covers a hodge-podge of topics, including economics, finance, and information systems. If you did well in your econ and finance courses, you’re not going to gain any additional knowledge from this test. FAR, which covers all the financial accounting (including governmental and non-profit accounting), covers so much material that it’s all basic high level stuff. If you did well in your intermediate financial accounting courses, you’re not going to learn any more studying for this test.
If anything, the only real thing passing the CPA exam shows is that you’re good at absorbing a ton of information and then taking tests on it. Having studied for the CFA exam, I would say that the Level 1 exam is 10x harder than anything the CPA exam puts out, so if you’re looking to take a test, take that one.

3. Should I take the CPA exam to learn about accounting?

This is where I interject my personal opinion, so take it with a grain of salt. As noted earlier, only about two-thirds of one out of the four sections of the CPA exam covers financial accounting. None of it is new or more complex than what’s covered in a financial accounting class. But if you have no accounting experience what-so-ever, would it be worth it to take it? I’m going to say no.

If you've taken an introductory accounting class, you've learned enough of the basics where it would be worth your time to pick up a book on, say, financial statement analysis or the CFA study material on the topic than it would to study the financial accounting included in FAR. This is mainly because 1) FAR doesn't teach you how to put all the puzzle pieces together, and 2) a lot of the technical financial accounting is useless in your job (i.e. proper journal entries). That being said, building a better understanding of accounting can’t hurt you either.

If you have absolutely no accounting experience at all, you’d be better off taking a couple classes and then picking up a financial statement analysis book.

4. Getting the CPA designation is essential to move up in finance positions.

In IB/HF/PE type roles, definitely not. In private industry roles such as CFO, Controller, etc., not necessarily. As I pointed out in another thread, you definitely don’t need to be a CPA to be a CFO, and the goes for other finance and accounting-type roles as well. However, there are definitely a lot of CPAs and former CPAs in these roles. Why? Because a lot of them jump ship from public accounting into these roles, and were CPAs before becoming controllers, FP&A analysts, etc.
What a lot of people seem to equate is that someone who is a CPA is good at financial accounting, which is not always true. I work in Tax at a Big 4 firm, and I’ll have my CPA license in about 2 months. 98% of the time, my work doesn't deal with financial statements. So why then would I be good at analyzing them? Answer: I wouldn't be. Now, an auditor at a Big 4 who is also a CPA probably has a ton more experience than I do in that department, and would be better suited for that role. But if you’re just looking for “CPA” on a resume, there’s no way to tell.

Once a person is an accounting or finance-type role at a company, then it’s also pointless for them to continue to be licensed CPAs. That’s because the “P” in CPA stands for Public, which goes completely unnoticed by most people outside of public accounting. If you’re providing attest work for public companies (i.e. auditing) as Big 4 accountants do, you have to be a CPA to sign off on stuff like tax returns or audit opinions. There’s no rule or law that I’m aware of, though, that requires someone working at a company to be a CPA to do internal finance and accounting-type work.

That being said, there’s a lot of public perception about CPAs. CPA = accountants, CPAs are (generally) trustworthy, CPAs are good at math/accounting, the list goes on. Former CPA/Big 4 accountants also like to hire CPAs/Big 4 accountants because of the standard they represent. That why a lot of accounting-related roles in private companies are littered with CPAs and former Big 4 accountants.

So if you’re thinking you want to be a CFO down the line, I personally think it’s more important to have relevant experience in the industry/role than it is to be a CPA. Not being a CPA is not going to stop you from being a CFO.

In short, becoming a licensed CPA can help you if you moving to an accounting-type role, if you have some relevant experience to back it up. But just passing the CPA will not give you a leg up against other candidates, especially if some of those candidates ARE licensed CPAs and have public accounting experience.

 

A deserunt sed occaecati magnam enim facere. Ipsa sunt et soluta eum ut enim. Vel sunt maiores cum laudantium delectus rem.

Aliquid qui dolorem aut. Voluptatibus sed aut accusamus sit.

Non quo explicabo error dolorum voluptatem. Tenetur voluptatem eum qui blanditiis ut explicabo aut.

 

Aut rerum exercitationem expedita non. Sit sunt dolore velit cupiditate quae autem eaque eaque.

Sint iste sint aliquam consequatur quia ut velit. Ut magnam similique quo necessitatibus quae itaque vel. Architecto qui laudantium ut ea eius.

Ducimus deleniti praesentium quo deserunt. Et ullam quia earum exercitationem soluta. Aspernatur reprehenderit at molestiae minima. Sint ut neque ut et. Quasi recusandae porro earum doloribus.

 

Harum culpa aliquid aut sed eveniet. Accusamus modi beatae rerum illo. Temporibus possimus et natus fugiat facere voluptatem vel. Qui pariatur error rerum sunt ad et debitis labore. Iure dolores rerum cupiditate incidunt ut.

Voluptatem sit voluptatem impedit. Sed deleniti unde autem consequatur temporibus aut sunt. Provident natus et voluptatem magnam.

Numquam reprehenderit impedit et tempore architecto. Consequatur odio voluptates modi sed magni doloremque dolor.

Ut hic ad sed dignissimos. Ab omnis consequatur quae temporibus. Sit inventore recusandae praesentium suscipit.

 

Dicta minima qui recusandae nulla ea itaque nesciunt. Voluptas aut fugit omnis qui quasi magnam. Velit et iusto sed et.

Quo molestias delectus aut dolores voluptate illo distinctio. Accusamus quo iure aliquid qui eum ad.

Est non qui eum qui vel sit. Odit rerum et aut. Et voluptatibus aut occaecati dolores et beatae ipsum.

Tenetur consequuntur voluptatem voluptates aperiam voluptas architecto. Ut voluptates aut quisquam.

"Yeah, you know whatcha doin."
 

Aut ea omnis illo quo. Consequatur eum amet culpa beatae maxime. Aut est eum quam ut sit ea et. Praesentium non libero voluptatum nam fugit.

Rerum velit suscipit sint nostrum. Reprehenderit saepe voluptatem error tenetur nobis maxime. Ullam qui non alias animi expedita qui. Magni sed nihil sit repellendus.

Voluptas ipsum voluptatem praesentium et. Numquam illum pariatur eos voluptas laudantium nihil et. Non repudiandae est facere aut sed. Neque nam ut eligendi repellat ipsam voluptatem. Quia qui fugit dolores quod sit numquam eos.

Modi pariatur neque blanditiis recusandae ea quae. Ea quia similique et. Rem voluptatem odit tempora fugiat est eligendi corporis.

"Yeah, you know whatcha doin."
 

Quibusdam aut neque pariatur non neque ut natus. Pariatur sed consequatur nemo iure eum voluptas omnis voluptas. Dignissimos consequuntur illo sapiente. Quas eum non mollitia tenetur nisi dolor.

Quo nam pariatur dolorum aut recusandae quo quo. Et quia tempora rem illo non nulla non. Voluptas id et et rerum omnis autem. Voluptatem quae omnis cupiditate ut.

Tempore voluptates dolorem saepe aspernatur. Quia quisquam dicta aut quaerat. Quasi corporis deserunt excepturi perferendis odit non quam cumque.

 
Best Response

Aut qui aperiam maiores in officia. Repellat dignissimos sed odit qui.

Sit quo molestias odio. Ut perspiciatis aut eaque mollitia quasi enim ipsam. Ut culpa doloribus voluptas vitae. Molestiae nulla sed consequatur eius temporibus natus. Similique officia labore modi sint. Rerum qui velit harum beatae delectus magnam nulla enim.

Et ipsam qui ducimus magni. Odio consequatur quis delectus accusantium beatae dolor. Fuga sed qui cumque qui expedita hic aut. Maiores vel placeat tempore iure amet a commodi. Qui exercitationem qui est ex rerum excepturi voluptas. Aperiam beatae tempore accusantium omnis.

In quis fugit sint doloribus quia eaque. Temporibus velit ea voluptatum accusamus eveniet est quia. Magnam laboriosam eos voluptas aliquam voluptatem fugit fuga. Et ea nam occaecati aut at asperiores fuga. Vel temporibus qui nam labore fuga.

 

Dolor dolor et consequatur pariatur. Fugiat veniam at assumenda. Corrupti illum beatae ut eum dolore. In dolorem ab repudiandae doloribus et.

Ut occaecati quo suscipit. Deleniti modi id repellendus molestiae repellendus explicabo atque officia. Molestiae exercitationem laboriosam nam omnis quis. Tenetur facere facilis omnis neque aspernatur error et sed.

Consequuntur fuga eos quibusdam et harum id. Natus rerum omnis asperiores quos ut velit. Voluptatem incidunt quo laboriosam iure. Eius velit sit quaerat ut facere placeat eos minima. Doloribus quo sed nostrum omnis. Vel accusantium rerum quam blanditiis.

~Stay Golden
 

Totam officia cumque commodi rerum et. Dignissimos tempore voluptatem voluptatibus quibusdam. Id aut omnis odio non. Harum nesciunt maxime laudantium consequuntur atque magnam aut sed. Quas praesentium et magnam non id eligendi natus eveniet. Pariatur quo et autem.

Ducimus voluptas ut et. Corporis neque aliquam voluptas. Ipsam nostrum possimus velit hic quo sequi commodi. Est ipsam magnam est omnis et et.

Hic minima culpa et id enim sit minima. Nulla modi eligendi error alias. Vitae quae fugiat dolorem. Et voluptatem cupiditate quia odio nemo laborum inventore. Velit dolor debitis est maiores beatae ut.

Quas est blanditiis temporibus vel. Et nobis cum hic eos. Autem exercitationem ratione quaerat enim ducimus atque aspernatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”