Do you think we are mostly going to be replaced by AI? If so what timeline (5yrs, 10yrs, 20yrs, 30yrs, >30yrs)?

Basically the title, leaving the question as open ended as possible. It's now been 1yr since ChatGPT debuted so we have a little more perspective from the panic knee-jerk reactions and a better sense of what the AI can do today / what rate of progress has looked like. Open to any and all thoughts on the subject (what jobs get killed off first, what sticks around maybe forever, how finance as an industry fares, etc) 


I had a response on another thread about how if we showed up to ancient Mesopotamia with a combine harvester and a factory, they would've said the same thing we're saying today about technology replacing us all. I'm sure finance people said the same thing when computers and Microsoft Excel were introduced so companies didn't need floors of number crunchers anymore. AI, like any other technology, is just a tool that will help us get more things done. Obviously some jobs will go away, but we're not "mostly" going to be replaced by AI.

Most Helpful

F*ck it I'll bite. Here's what I think a progression of AI over the time horizon might look like. To lay the ground work, I don't think we're gonna see Skynet/Terminator type of pure rogue autonomous AI anytime soon. Not with the current processing chip technology. We basically have reached limitation on how small we can get the transistors with existing tech. I believe 3nm is basically the smallest silicon transistor we can "print" without running into an actual quantum physics issue with electrons hopping over. This is all of course written with the caveat this is just pure speculation after a certain point. Current AI models, to paint with a broad brush, is basically a regression model on steroids. Also this is just one person's opinion / creative imagination. Also also, I'm not an expert in any of this. Just an enthusiast who worked in tech companies and have some tangential understanding from it. So grain of salt and all that. 

5 Years: Majority of basically routine task are automated. Think basic P&L statements, low level of financial forecast/analysis can be done with AI. There already software exist that can do these things. Roles like AR/AP, invoicing etc are automated are automated and mostly run by AI; maybe with a final human check/verification. Use cases will be limited to specific jobs & functions that the AI is designed to do. Broader everyday common civilian use will be limited or maybe just getting to a point of commercialization that it's approaching affordability. (Cloud processing ain't cheap, AWS isn't in the business of losing monies)

10 Years: Wide commercial adoption for everyday use. Processing is cheap and easy and affordable to most well off families. Most business will employ some form of AI to aid in running the business. Will still have certain limitations in what it can do. Use cases for AI will have expanded beyond basics. I think school will be teaching AI coding in classes instead of Java coding classes. 

15 Years: now we're getting into conjuncture territory here. Maybe quantum computing might be more mature and available for purchase by research institutions and gov entities/companies and they starts to incorporate into their workflow. AI processing speeds will have an evolutionary jump in capabilities. Probably have base capabilities to manage aspect of our lives beyond business applications. Thinking along the lines of manufacturing design be aided with AI powered by quantum computing, or electric power generation with a one-to-one match to demand. Manufacturing will be largely automated with very limited human intervention. Providing forecast with increasing granularity such as predicting weather pattern with much much higher certainty than now. 

20 Years: hopefully if we design the AI functionalities correctly, it can automate much of our human needs such as food production, how much housing we need. AI effectively optimizes most aspect of our lives. (yes, that's some optimistic view). 

30 Years: throw up a pie in the air and see what lands and what doesn't. If doesn't land, start praying cuz an Arnold Schwarzenegger Terminator might actually be around the corner. Bit of a cheeky joke, but tech progresses so fast that it's difficult to even think about the realm of the possible. 

Overall, I think everything more or less hinges on quantum computing or an alternative to increase processing speed. The faster our computers can run the better AI can process. How an AI processes and the parameters that are set determines the wider applicability and usefulness. And I pray the military industrial complex does not get their dirty hands on it. Be interested to see other's thoughts. 


Great thoughts -- though the one element you didn't account for in those various scenarios (5yrs, 10yrs, 15yrs, etc) is the impact on jobs at each stage

I'm skeptical of the 'new job creation' argument. yes there will be new jobs, but will the quantum of new jobs be sufficient to replace jobs taken away? I'm very skeptical

I think humans will still have an edge in 5yrs, though in 10yrs the base case in my mind is at least 70% of white collar tasks can be done by AI. You just don't need that many people relative to what we have today in this scenario 


Fair call out. I guess I started thinking about it and the more I thought it just pure making up sh*t. What I do think is that there will be a job transition to jobs that is more oriented AI and robotics. Swarm drone and more diverse purpose for drones. Maybe farming uses, maybe construction, hardware oriented. Jobs will naturally shift away to what the market demands. All the junior AP/AR analyst won't disappear overnight. There will be a transition. I mean ice deliveryman used to be a profession. I'm sure the question of "what will ice deliveryman do after everyone gets a refrigerator?" was probably asked. 

In terms of quantum, I'm concerned as well. But I think new opportunities will open up that people can shift into without some type of catastrophic mismatch between available jobs & qualified people. 


I'm all for the adoption of AI over time and improving our society. I too get worried about how quickly it happens and whether that means major disruption in job markets that we don't have enough time to adjust to. That said, I do think adoption will take considerably longer than we think. I think we look at things like Tik Tok or other apps and how quickly they are adopted and sort of extrapolate that to something like AI. In reality, AI applications that are going to be majorly disruptive to job markets are going to take time. Not only will it take time to even build out the necessary infrastructure (power grids, chips, etc.) for everyone to be running high power AI programs, but these things aren't going to be free (they will actually be quite expensive as whoever develops these disruptive applications first are going to want to be paid big time for them). They are going to require major investments which is another layer of complexity for companies and businesses to overcome in adopting it, especially in earlier stages. I think for those reasons we hopefully see the changes happen over 5 - 10 year periods instead of 1 - 2 year periods which allow us to have more time do adapt as a society. 


Hic quas rerum ut aut temporibus. Ex est voluptatum nobis ut ea voluptatum porro. Pariatur sed quam debitis porro.

Voluptatem sunt facilis in. Sunt rem rerum officia quia dolore culpa.

Labore soluta ut necessitatibus dolorum voluptates. In iste sed explicabo. Placeat qui consectetur itaque odio numquam. Dolor recusandae et voluptas.

Et corrupti dolor perspiciatis est quia. Omnis sed aperiam vel esse. Modi qui ad at et doloremque aut. Reiciendis quo ratione quo sapiente magnam a. Quod sint voluptas et itaque et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 11 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 06 97.7%
  • Lincoln International 04 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (81) $263
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (12) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $172
  • 2nd Year Analyst (60) $169
  • 1st Year Analyst (193) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (142) $101
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”


redever's picture
BankonBanking's picture
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
Secyh62's picture
GameTheory's picture
kanon's picture
CompBanker's picture
dosk17's picture
Jamoldo's picture
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”