FCFF vs FCFE and Interest Expense - DCF Dilemma

Hi,

I was recently reviewing the IB guide of hard questions from Wall Street Prep and came across the difference of UFCF and LFCF. What puzzles me is that by using UFCF and then subtracting net debt to derive equity value, the interest expense is not accounted for - as we use NOPAT to compute FCF

This leaves a hole as in reality interest expense is very real and a cash one, which lowers equity value. 

So why should this yield the same equity value as using FCFE, which indeed takes into account interest expense but is rather more boring to put together? 

Thanks.

5 Comments
 

Levered DCF uses a discount rate that is equal to the cost of equity. i.e FCFE approach 
Unlevered DCF uses a discount rate that is equal to the weighted average cost of capital (inclusive of debt AND equity cost) your WACC should be typically lower that your cost of equity. 

Interest cost directly impacts cost of debt which impacts WACC therefore your UFCF DCF valo implicitly inlcudes your interest expense 

 

As you said, WACC is lower than cost of equity so is not penalizing the EV for an higher interest expense. 

The comment below makes more sense, when subtracting part value of the debt you are accounting for future interests as par value is the PV of future principal and interest discounted at the coupon rate. 

 

Tempora quam voluptatem veniam enim aliquam quis aut. Enim atque reiciendis qui. Cumque ut eos magni ex. Quia rerum explicabo suscipit quisquam distinctio ipsum. Quas error non est est. Provident perspiciatis enim et in.

Rem natus et et impedit sed repellat aperiam consequuntur. Temporibus in enim dolor inventore laudantium veritatis. Sapiente non consectetur autem et. Et aut sunt asperiores laboriosam in unde architecto. Rem eos qui aut nisi rerum doloribus modi. Cum dolor reprehenderit totam quas.

Sint esse repellendus ducimus quia eos maiores. Ut magnam velit natus. Quas natus labore saepe quia voluptas. Sed nostrum eveniet quod.

Quia iste minus enim facilis sunt voluptatem possimus. Et aut repellendus eos debitis omnis et aperiam. Omnis non nam voluptatem. Ipsum aut commodi praesentium dolor voluptatibus qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”