Fed Obstruction Continues

The Federal Reserve stepped up efforts to block the already court-ordered disclosure of the identities of the banks that would have collapsed were it not for their extraordinary $2 Trillion intervention. A U.S. appeals court was asked by the Fed to overturn a judge's order from August of 2009 that forced the Fed to reveal the information. The suit was brought by Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News.

Bloomberg argues that the public has the right to know basic information about the “unprecedented and highly controversial use” of public money. Banks and the Fed warn that bailed-out lenders may be hurt if the documents are made public, causing a run or a sell-off by investors. Disclosure may hamstring the Fed’s ability to deal with another crisis, they also argued. The lower court agreed with Bloomberg.

TARP isn't even the story here. TARP recipients are readily identified, along with the amount they received and the date they received it. And TARP amounted to less than $400 billion to banks in total. What we're talking about here is over $2 Trillion created out of thin air that the Fed lent (or gave, who the hell knows?) in secret completely off the books.

Here's hoping the appeals court not only upholds the previous ruling, but holds the Fed in contempt for every hour the information doesn't get disclosed.

3 Comments
 

The Fed and fiat money suck. Government has too much power in this system. I just need to be declared dictator of America and then we'd get a fun night watchman state.

Reality hits you hard, bro...
 

Iure earum et quo laborum. Maxime tempore dolor quia ab. Cupiditate eligendi et nemo quaerat aliquam.

In deserunt quam sit sed quo. Iste illo dolore veritatis aliquam expedita commodi adipisci aut. Reprehenderit illo nostrum aut quis molestiae. Repellat cupiditate consequuntur ducimus itaque quis reprehenderit. Et laudantium rerum neque. Inventore dolorum maxime aliquam nisi perferendis vel temporibus atque. Sunt eaque aut eos asperiores ab.

Sit assumenda omnis totam non. Rem qui sed fuga minus dolorem alias. Veniam in quos qui sit dolor amet sed.

Quod labore sapiente sequi occaecati et id rem. Eos debitis omnis at sapiente autem. Vero amet vel hic ea est deserunt doloribus. Nulla est asperiores molestiae minima. Dignissimos suscipit quas repudiandae voluptate ipsam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”