For all you quants. and Blast

Without using a calculator or the derivative.

Find the maximum and when it will happen. P(t)= 120t - .4t^4 +1000

Can't use wolfram or google and you have to show work.

I made the argument that its almost impossible to do this problem without the derivative or a calculator but another WSOer say it's possible but they don't know how. If someone does know how to do this I'd love to see the steps.

20 Comments
 
blastoisethe function?

Basically the question was asking about rabbits and it was find the point when the rabbit population is the highest.

The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee WSO is not your personal search function.
 
blastoiselaplace xform alowed?

no derivative no computer paper pencil get to work.

The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee WSO is not your personal search function.
 

just translate the polynomial in the P(t) direction so that there are degenerate roots

"'In summary, people are morons and who cares. Make a shit ton of money. I've never seen a Ferrari paid for by what people think.' - ANT" -rufiolove
 
Best Response

This is more of a consulting question than a task for quants. Here goes. Noting that we are not allowed derivatives, always look at the extremes of a function.

i) P(t=0) = 1000 clearly. At this point we note that there is no need to look at any negative values of t, since the linear function (120t) will offset any positive equivalent. ii) lim(t>inf)P(t) will clearly be negative since t^4 scales much faster than t^1, regardless of the coefficient in front.

Now, lets check for specific t values. When t= 10, a nice round number for which we know t^4, we have

iii) P(t=10) = 1200-4000+1000 0.

So already we know that the maximum must be between t = 0 and t = 10. Powers of 4 are easy to do in your head, and most people ahem should know it for values 2 to 8 or 9. Because we have the +1000 at the end for all cases, we need only consider the difference between 120t and 0.4t^4. If we say Q(t) = 120t - 0.4t^4,

iv) Q(2) = 240 - 6.4 = 233.6 v) Q(3) = 360 - 32.4 = 327.6 vi) Q(4) = 480 - 102.4 = 377.6 vii) Q(5) = 600 - 250 = 350

So the maximum value of Q(t) and therefore P(t) will occur somewhere between t = 4 and t = 5. We can then look at t = 4.5, and a decimal place around it (t = 4.4, t = 4.6). Its then a matter of how accurate you want the answer to be (in terms of t) and thereafter P(t).

Just Do It
 
maximumlikelihoodThis is more of a consulting question than a task for quants. Here goes. Noting that we are not allowed derivatives, always look at the extremes of a function.

i) P(t=0) = 1000 clearly. At this point we note that there is no need to look at any negative values of t, since the linear function (120t) will offset any positive equivalent. ii) lim(t>inf)P(t) will clearly be negative since t^4 scales much faster than t^1, regardless of the coefficient in front.

Now, lets check for specific t values. When t= 10, a nice round number for which we know t^4, we have

iii) P(t=10) = 1200-4000+1000 0.

So already we know that the maximum must be between t = 0 and t = 10. Powers of 4 are easy to do in your head, and most people ahem should know it for values 2 to 8 or 9. Because we have the +1000 at the end for all cases, we need only consider the difference between 120t and 0.4t^4. If we say Q(t) = 120t - 0.4t^4,

iv) Q(2) = 240 - 6.4 = 233.6 v) Q(3) = 360 - 32.4 = 327.6 vi) Q(4) = 480 - 102.4 = 377.6 vii) Q(5) = 600 - 250 = 350

So the maximum value of Q(t) and therefore P(t) will occur somewhere between t = 4 and t = 5. We can then look at t = 4.5, and a decimal place around it (t = 4.4, t = 4.6). Its then a matter of how accurate you want the answer to be (in terms of t) and thereafter P(t).

+1

__________
 

I'm guessing you're working on nonlinear dynamics problems (1-D at the moment it seems). You'll soon learn of how important derivatives and the Jacobian are. But this is really old school mathematics, not useful for every day life.

Interesting nonetheless.

Just Do It
 

good luck calculating 4.5...^4 in any reasonable amount of time. it's possible to solve this problem analytically without "derivatives".

"'In summary, people are morons and who cares. Make a shit ton of money. I've never seen a Ferrari paid for by what people think.' - ANT" -rufiolove
 
acronymgood luck calculating 4.5...^4 in any reasonable amount of time. it's possible to solve this problem analytically without "derivatives".

4.5^4 = ((5-0.5)^2)^2 = (25-5+0.25)^2 = (20 + 1/4)^2 = (400 + 10 + 1/16) = 410.0625

[EDIT: It havnig an analytical solution means the answer should come out to a nice whole number. If we do take the derivative to check what the real solution is, we have

P'(t) = 0 = 120 - 1.6t^3. The answer to which we have t^3 = 75. This should be t = 4.2...

When you substitute this back into P(t), what do you get?]

Solutions or kindly STFUGTFO.

Just Do It
 

Taking the first derivative I get to 120^(1/3).

Without taking the derivative what I would do is ignore the 1000, and then solve this: 120t>0.4t^4, using this method I get to 480^(1/4)

absolutearbitrageur.blogspot.com
 
JobHopefulP(0) = 1000 -.4t^4 and 120t offset each other to a certain extent. You want to solve for when -4t^4 completely offsets 120t and drives that sum to be negative

No you want to maximize 120t - 0.04t^4

P(4) is greater than P(6) to P(7)

edit...p(4) sorry

__________
 

Isn't the maximum found using the 2nd derivative?

"All I've ever wanted was an honest week's pay for an honest day's work."
 

Adipisci praesentium ut ratione quo qui. Odit rerum et corporis ullam tenetur at qui. Consequuntur cum ad reprehenderit porro.

Incidunt nihil qui facere suscipit deleniti. Praesentium voluptatum ex autem temporibus pariatur. Iusto id impedit eos voluptate consequuntur perspiciatis eum. Harum recusandae accusamus qui et.

Quia distinctio sunt sit fuga sed error illo. Odio non sit architecto consequatur. Eum aliquam animi et veniam cupiditate mollitia ut. Aut et architecto maiores incidunt provident et eos porro.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”