21 Comments
 

I'm pleased that Obama will be even more miserable and hemmed in, but nothing is going to get done. I'd like to see some pro business legislature to help continue this paper economic recovery though.

 

I think there are two very interesting things to consider about yesterday's results:

1) The GOP now has the largest majority in the House since WWII, which shows a very strong national sentiment that the national media has been trying to hide for awhile.

2) The GOP senate victory in Florida could have big implications on the 2016 Presidential election and I feel that FL is one of the most important states for either 2016 candidate to win.

 

We see these swings often (re Bush in his second term), but it just further reinforces Obama's fall from grace. I hope Republicans can do some good to bolster their nomination in 2016. All I know is I am happy that Obama will sooner rather than later be leaving the white house. What a mistake people made with this guy.

 
TNA

We see these swings often (re Bush in his second term), but it just further reinforces Obama's fall from grace. I hope Republicans can do some good to bolster their nomination in 2016. All I know is I am happy that Obama will sooner rather than later be leaving the white house. What a mistake people made with this guy.

Agreed. I just hope they don't F*** this up, this is a really big chance although I suspect very little will get done in the next 2 years. Would be a nice time to get some of the FAR left SCOTUS members to retire, but I doubt seriously that will happen also.

Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
 

Agreed that swings normally happen as every president since WW2 has lost party control in midterm elections after being re-elected. But with that being said nothing substantial will likely get done as Republicans can continue their current strategy of not willing to work with Obama and come to a deal to pass any sort of legislation, so more of what we have endured for the past 6 years will continue. It would be nice if the new majority could some pass a form of tax, immigration, and regulatory reform before the elections in 2016 but they wont because they refuse to pass anything while Obama is President.

Which leaves me disgusted with both the whole process as both sides put party ahead of the good of the country. Congress and the President have failed this country miserably, it takes two to dance while making legislation and both sides are acting like 6th graders and are being stubborn like the other side of the aisle has cooties. Both branches need to grow up and realize their failures have real effects on business and the lives of Americans.

"When you expect things to happen - strangely enough - they do happen." - JP Morgan
 
eignenvector

Agreed that swings normally happen as every president since WW2 has lost party control in midterm elections after being re-elected. But with that being said nothing substantial will likely get done as Republicans can continue their current strategy of not willing to work with Obama and come to a deal to pass any sort of legislation, so more of what we have endured for the past 6 years will continue. It would be nice if the new majority could some pass a form of tax, immigration, and regulatory reform before the elections in 2016 but they wont because they refuse to pass anything while Obama is President.

Which leaves me disgusted with both the whole process as both sides put party ahead of the good of the country. Congress and the President have failed this country miserably, it takes two to dance while making legislation and both sides are acting like 6th graders and are being stubborn like the other side of the aisle has cooties. Both branches need to grow up and realize their failures have real effects on business and the lives of Americans.

Spot on. It's hard for me to imagine any young professional not sharing this sentiment. Democrats want reforms, but too many and too extreme, and Republicans want nothing at all to change - they'd probably lower minimum wage if they could. These party politics are such a sham. Politicians need to stop politicking and be more practical.
 
TNA

We see these swings often (re Bush in his second term), but it just further reinforces Obama's fall from grace. I hope Republicans can do some good to bolster their nomination in 2016. All I know is I am happy that Obama will sooner rather than later be leaving the white house. What a mistake people made with this guy.

The problem is that the republicans will see this as a broad mandate to propose things that are too far right for most of the American public and that won't get passed anyway (very similar to how when the Dems took over the House they put Pelosi in as Speaker rather than someone more moderate and from a less controversial district-the country didn't put the dems in power and then elect Obama because they necessarily wanted to go far left, they just wanted to balance out the Bush years and it was largely a reaction to Bush, just like this is a reaction to Obama). And since the primaries are basically going to start now, the right will feel emboldened and more powerful than they actually are and incorrectly gauge the general electorate. Then they'll put up a candidate that's too far right on any number of or all issues-economic/regulatory, social, whatever- and end up with a candidate that's not electable beyond those who vote in primaries.

These parties are just some of the most idiotic entities one could ever conceive. A pure and rather extreme dogmatic approach to governing doesn't work in a representative republic when most of the people are in the middle.

 

The best thing they can do is act moderately. Because anything they do will be attributed to "conservatives" as a whole. If they de-regulate and it causes issues; you better believe that they will be blacklisted. Anyone in financial services or O&G industry is going to have a good 2 years and it'll only get better IF and big IF a R get's into presidential office in 2016.

Although it isn't popular here, I'm pro-regulation. Does it stunt growth, yes, technically. However any growth from unregulated processes or industries is growth which shouldn't be condoned or desired. It's not all bout the P&L its also about stability even if that means incremental growth.

"It is better to have a friendship based on business, than a business based on friendship." - Rockefeller. "Live fast, die hard. Leave a good looking body." - Navy SEAL
 
Best Response
UTDFinanceGuy

The best thing they can do is act moderately. Because anything they do will be attributed to "conservatives" as a whole. If they de-regulate and it causes issues; you better believe that they will be blacklisted. Anyone in financial services or O&G industry is going to have a good 2 years and it'll only get better IF and big IF a R get's into presidential office in 2016.

Although it isn't popular here, I'm pro-regulation. Does it stunt growth, yes, technically. However any growth from unregulated processes or industries is growth which shouldn't be condoned or desired. It's not all bout the P&L its also about stability even if that means incremental growth.

I think one of the problems with regulation is you have people creating regulation who have spent their entire career in government. They don't have the real world perspective on how that regulation will affect the businesses. One of the issues is the government doesn't pay market rate for industry talent, which keeps all of the sophisticated finance / economic knowledge in the private sector. And as a result, you get politicians with little to no economic knowledge preaching about the economy and pushing reform.

 

Vote Party A Party A does nothing for 8 years Vote Party B Party B does nothing for 8 years Vote Party A

Repeat

Yay Politics

This to all my hatin' folks seeing me getting guac right now..
 

Sunt aspernatur dolorum iusto delectus libero dolorem. Voluptatem nulla quos quia sequi.

Vero aut exercitationem impedit ut rerum consectetur aliquid. Maiores voluptatem sunt quam praesentium. Sint sit et velit et distinctio iure quod ullam. Aut minima et quia rerum sint.

Nesciunt in temporibus laborum iusto aspernatur atque. Blanditiis voluptates doloribus et sed ipsa ab placeat. Numquam eius inventore voluptatem saepe cum. Est soluta dignissimos facere autem impedit ea sunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”