7 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, opinions on Trump's position during midterms are mixed and highly polarized. Some threads suggest that Trump has a strong base of support, particularly among conservatives and populist voters, which could help him weather challenges. However, others highlight significant divisions in the country and potential backlash from his policies, trade wars, and controversies, which could hurt his party's performance in the midterms.

The discussions also emphasize that while Trump has been a polarizing figure, his ability to dominate the political narrative and leverage economic factors like tax cuts and job growth might play in his favor. On the flip side, issues like immigration, trade policies, and investigations into his administration could energize opposition voters.

Ultimately, the outcome would depend on voter turnout, particularly among moderates and swing voters, as well as how effectively both parties mobilize their bases.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/trading/trumps-trade-war-are-consumers-and-investors-screwed?customgpt=1, How would Bernie be for Real Estate?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investing/the-trump-effect-on-markets-a-financial-not-a-political-analysis?customgpt=1

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Historically cooked. 

Most presidents lose ground during midterms. Most presidents manage to do that without a disasterous economy, a rudderless and unnecessary war, ICE murdering civilians in the street, obvious corruption/enrichment by the president’s family, and almost daily stories of idiocy and incompetence from the cabinet. Oh, and Epstein. That’s not going away. 

This is why they are pushing so hard for voter suppression measures. It’s the only way they have a chance. 

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

I'm curious what it would take to get the remaining 41% (per Nate Silver) of voters who approve Trump to abandon him at this point.  I am convinced (and Trump himself seems to be as well) that he could shoot someone on fifth avenue and not lose any votes.

But as @CRE has said, he has probably lost most of the "new" Trump voters who he cobbled together through podcasts and saying he would bring prices down, and that should be enough for a decent loss.

 
Most Helpful

There's a significant chance this could be the inverse of Ronald Regan's 1984 election map, (He won 49 states) especially in the house. His redistricting push wasn't particularly successful, and may actually end up backfiring bigly.

The goal of gerrymandering is "packing and cracking": The idea is that the other side ends up with a small number of districts where they're expected to normally get 90%+ of the vote, while you get a large number where you're expected to get 55-60%. The risk is that if you're so unpopular that the votes swing by 10%+ it could backfire, and you could lose a lot of seats.  Based on current polling, there seems like a big chance this could happen. 

The only difference between Asset Management and Investment Research is assets. I generally see somebody I know on TV on Bloomberg/CNBC etc. once or twice a week. This sounds cool, until I remind myself that I see somebody I know on ESPN five days a week.
 

Most likely, this will be a 2010 Obama type result. 50-60 seats lost, multiple senate seats. If the Senate map wasn't extremely advantaged to Trump, he'd lose that easily. 

 

Ducimus similique deleniti et rerum esse error deserunt. Sit aliquid et sed tenetur quaerat suscipit iure. Nihil et aut laborum doloribus enim non et. Necessitatibus accusamus ab maxime aut nihil amet assumenda autem. Doloribus quae nemo autem explicabo reiciendis assumenda est.

Recusandae voluptatum ut cumque et quos. Inventore aspernatur vel ullam. Sed iusto ut sit in voluptatibus odio ipsam. Debitis consequatur mollitia beatae doloremque dolores qui qui. Deserunt provident praesentium eveniet dolorem rem beatae sed nemo.

Eaque velit mollitia illum doloribus aut architecto fugiat. Sit libero cumque qui alias. Expedita recusandae aut a dolorum iure. Eum esse nam quas minus sint doloribus sunt officia.

Earum et nostrum quisquam est. Voluptatem nihil sed voluptatibus rerum officiis exercitationem facere. Qui quidem voluptates atque illo laboriosam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”