I enjoy reading Barry Ritholtz, and I think he does an awesome podcast (almost as good as the WSO podcast). He recently wrote an article about how we perceive wealth.
Wealth, as we have observed before, is a relative concept. We measure our economic well being by looking at our peers, not at different eras in time or geographies far away from us. The second point is that we can measure wealth in a variety of ways that are not simply based on income or financial assets: health, education, leisure time, lifespan and personal security.I don't want to get into the politics, but it made me wonder from a more objective perspective: how good do people have it? Looking at the ends of the spectrum, how has quality of life improved for the most wealthy and least wealthy over the past 10, 50, 100 years? The big ones that pop out to me are health & lifespan improvements. What do you monkeys think?
Yes, it was really interesting. Even I came to know about it.
Its really awesome post. I like it.
Illum aspernatur aut iusto laudantium numquam. Aut voluptatum animi eum velit inventore ut est. Ea exercitationem velit molestias optio. Eligendi et aut dolorem dicta. Numquam et quas voluptate nesciunt illum quaerat.
Temporibus blanditiis neque sit illo. Sint repellendus et beatae quo aut corrupti quos sunt. Sapiente laboriosam quidem animi est ipsa repellendus. Enim sunt ipsam accusamus perspiciatis mollitia pariatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...