How H1B visas enable the government, universities and industry to supress PHDs/skilled workers -Eric Weinstein @ Thiel Capital

"There is a suspicion that international postdocs are in many cases a form of slave labor within the American research establishment. ...

There are some very touchy issues surrounding the question of international postdoctoral students. We can certainly identify some advantages to having these students on our campuses....international postdoctoral students provide a good deal of low-cost talent for our universities. They often serve as teachers in our research laboratories by supervising both doctoral and masters students." - Steven B. Sample, President, University of Southern California, "Postdoctoral Education in America", a Speech to the AAU, September 23, 1993

https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/h…

I've been listening to both Eric and his brother discuss politics lately and think they both bring up interesting points that allude to greater conspiracies about big industry, the university system and the federal government. This particular paper stood out to me because prior to studying finance I originally wanted to go down the PHD track in STEM, and after reading it I feel even better about my decision to abandon that path. I would love to hear the thoughts of people who made similar switches, know someone who is going through the struggles described in the paper and some of the older and wiser folks in industry who were around when these acts were initially passed back in the 90s.

4 Comments
 

Trump is right to crack down on H1-B visas, as it has been abused by companies to deliberately undercut American workers to import cheaper foreigners. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the vast majority of H1-B visa holders are lower skilled workers in areas such as IT, NOT STEM geniuses who work in super technical cutting-edge fields.

 
Most Helpful

Right, but I don't think that's hugely important by comparison. Think about the value produced by even 100 low-level IT professionals vs the research that can be done by 1 high-level STEM PHD. The point is that by deliberately handicapping the development of US-born STEM PHDs with this policy trick in order to lower the costs to colleges and corporations, the government has by extension cut down on the US' own leading edge in innovation. What sense does it make to continuously dedicate resources and time to educate people who we then send back to their countries to be competitive against US businesses after we've gotten some years of cheap work out of them? The US is basically selling out its long term human capital and educational advantage for short term gains.

 

Non in consequatur vitae. Quasi optio quibusdam rem vel unde illo error beatae. Perferendis dignissimos sit fugit minus architecto ducimus quia.

Perferendis ut voluptas consectetur labore dolore quidem voluptatem. Eos aspernatur consequuntur aut magni unde. Provident iusto et consequatur. Distinctio nesciunt labore assumenda magni sed rem aut.

Doloremque dolor consequuntur sunt voluptas doloremque rerum. Unde cumque et dolore repudiandae ab quibusdam. Omnis id ut quisquam libero non occaecati. Nam quas accusamus error quis nesciunt consequatur nobis. Minima minima earum sapiente quod placeat aut. Officiis non commodi saepe voluptatem.

Distinctio necessitatibus dolorum laudantium impedit ut totam. Vitae quo pariatur deserunt nostrum voluptates voluptatem iste. Non velit autem ut quidem.

 

Quia impedit dolorem asperiores beatae nostrum. Non neque corporis numquam. Officiis voluptates voluptates qui fugit magni dolor laudantium. Dolorem quo minus id ipsum sequi et aut. Iure libero distinctio blanditiis.

Totam laboriosam quas molestias natus ut id explicabo. Nihil odio molestiae molestias commodi repellat. Sit a itaque et repudiandae quia. Molestias cupiditate dolor ut.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (23) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (82) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”