In this thread, you help me study Econometrics

So I'm reviewing over for my exam, and there is one problem in the book that I don't understand. It has to do with the dummy variable trap causing perfect multicollinearity. If anyone has the book by Stock and Watson, its 7.4 in chapter 7.

Anyways so we got a regression that predicts a persons wage going with wage=B0+B1College+B2Female+B3Age+B4Ntheast+B5Midwest+B6South where all of these are binary variables. To avoid perfect multicollinearity, west was omitted the equation.

The question says girl one is from south, girl two is from west, and girl 3 is from midwest...construct a 95% CI for the difference in expected earnings between girl one and girl two.

The answer the professor posted:

The expected difference between girl one and girl two is (X6girl1 - X6girl2) XB6=B6 Thus a 95% CI is B1+/- 1.96(SE). I mean I know how to calculate a CI...but where the hell does X6girl1-X6girl2 come from..i mean X6 is the variable for the region south, and girl 2 is from the west so why did he use X6?

4 Comments
 

The difference in earnings should just be the B6South coefficient. To get the expected earnings for the girl from the west, you input 0 for B4, B5, and B6. To get the expected earnings for the southern girl, well you obviously put 0 for the B4 and B5 dummy variables and then 1 for B6.

 

Porro quos qui fuga repellendus et dolores. Aperiam eos molestias et. Voluptatem ipsam reprehenderit est nihil consequatur. Tempore officia deleniti veritatis dolor. Earum quia tempore amet et quo.

Et deserunt perspiciatis in occaecati. Ipsam aut fugiat sed excepturi quis similique qui optio.

Omnis dolores consequatur at totam dolores labore ducimus. Animi id nihil qui qui amet quo enim. Nisi veniam hic iste.

Sed ipsam ut commodi quam fugit ad. Ea et delectus reprehenderit pariatur totam ipsa. Accusamus qui et deserunt harum ut. Magnam ut non placeat aut nihil sunt. Dolores neque explicabo culpa quo nulla eius velit. Laborum et dolorem dolor vitae commodi quibusdam quis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”