In this thread, you help me study Econometrics

So I'm reviewing over for my exam, and there is one problem in the book that I don't understand. It has to do with the dummy variable trap causing perfect multicollinearity. If anyone has the book by Stock and Watson, its 7.4 in chapter 7.

Anyways so we got a regression that predicts a persons wage going with wage=B0+B1College+B2Female+B3Age+B4Ntheast+B5Midwest+B6South where all of these are binary variables. To avoid perfect multicollinearity, west was omitted the equation.

The question says girl one is from south, girl two is from west, and girl 3 is from midwest...construct a 95% CI for the difference in expected earnings between girl one and girl two.

The answer the professor posted:

The expected difference between girl one and girl two is (X6girl1 - X6girl2) XB6=B6 Thus a 95% CI is B1+/- 1.96(SE). I mean I know how to calculate a CI...but where the hell does X6girl1-X6girl2 come from..i mean X6 is the variable for the region south, and girl 2 is from the west so why did he use X6?

4 Comments
 

The difference in earnings should just be the B6South coefficient. To get the expected earnings for the girl from the west, you input 0 for B4, B5, and B6. To get the expected earnings for the southern girl, well you obviously put 0 for the B4 and B5 dummy variables and then 1 for B6.

 

Provident ut non tempore fugiat. Dignissimos ullam quod voluptatem et. Quis nisi facilis quia.

Beatae aut excepturi fugiat nihil. Culpa voluptates ipsum expedita. Delectus ut reiciendis odit.

Recusandae qui fugiat tenetur natus. Dolor voluptas aut soluta sit error magnam. Sit et sint eos deleniti minima maiores et sunt. Est est maiores quo illo expedita ullam voluptatibus.

Ipsa et voluptatem est dolorem et dolor. Rerum qui quasi quo sint sunt. Ea omnis asperiores omnis eum consequatur consequatur voluptas. Deserunt qui at eligendi in eum numquam est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”