Is it almost better to be a Straight White Guy in Finance? Hot take

Ok - everyone knows being a straight white man (SWM) in todays economy sucks for employment, let alone finance. It is a severe up hill battle, where even semi/non-target neeks that are 'diversity' potentially (albeit maybe not always) have an advantage over a top target SWM. 

Now, here is where I get wondering... coming from this background, where those SWM that matriculate to these top BB/EBs in coveted M&A seats make up now a minority of those in their analyst/intern classes, the level of ability they posses must be far greater than peers as they had a significantly more difficult recruiting process. This would suggest these are top bucket analysts, who would likewise (correlation not causation) have gone to the top in the 80s as well in a non diversity environment. I am not referring to these. However, this is where it gets interesting. Say an average non standout SWM somehow matriculates to a top seat (maybe someone like me). The majority of SWM current Partners/MDs disapprove of the extent of the going diversity movement, especially as back in the day these were top frat guys who view our current generation as soft. 

Hence, an average middle bucket analyst that is SWM is likely to almost be favoured then a diversity kid, as now the diversity kids are likely to be the majority, there is less SWM competition at the current analyst level, meaning they could theoretically, due to MD/Parnter endorsement, rise higher than their peers and have an advantage say over in the 80s. 

Maybe the stress of a rapidly depleting trust fund is getting to me but idk just some thoughts. Let me know what you guys think down in the comments below. For the record I am a SWM ΣΧ senior at a H/Y/P/W/S who bagged an M&A GS/JPM/MS/Evercore/LAZ return offer (NYC ofc you brokies), and ergo as such, there is a demonstrated vested interest in my daydream.