Kyrie to Celtics, Isaiah to Cavaliers

Hello you filthy animals,

What is everyone's opinion on Kyrie Irving being traded to the Celtics for Isaiah Thomas, Jae Crowder, Ante Zizic, and 2018 Nets Pick?

Pretty big move in the Eastern Conference, but it doesn't change that these two teams are still the top two teams in the East. I think this could be a beneficial change for both teams, I am just a little worried about Thomas' defense for the Cavaliers.

What do you all think?

27 Comments
 
Best Response

Lol this is trade rape: Isaiah Thomas - all NBA PG, Ante Zizic - 20 and a former 1st rder, Jae Crowder -a very good 3 and D role player, and basically a top 5 pick (if they get Bagley III or Michael Porter those are potential all NBA players) for Kyrie Irving, an all star but a ball hog who doesn't play D and doesn't know how to run an offense despite being a "pg". Kudos to the Cavs for this heist.

Array
 
"BobTheBaker" Lol this is trade rape: Isaiah Thomas - all NBA PG, Ante Zizic - 20 and a former 1st rder, Jae Crowder -a very good 3 and D role player, and basically a top 5 pick (if they get Bagley III or Michael Porter those are potential all NBA players) for Kyrie Irving, an all star but a ball hog who doesn't play D and doesn't know how to run an offense despite being a "pg". Kudos to the Cavs for this heist.

And Isaiah Thomas is famous for his defense? Two extremely overrated point guards switched places, I can easily name 6 better PGs in the league.

 

They both don't play defense but IT is just as good a scorer and can actually play PG..... plus Cle added a top 5 pick, a great role player, and Ante Zizic.... so I really don't see what your point is here. 6 better PGs than Isaiah Thomas? Maybe, I'd be curious to see your names though.

Array
 

History repeats itself -- the Cavs didn't make the playoffs until LeBron came back and they traded for Love. Kyrie just isn't a leader (or a Big Baller TM). The Cavs still have the same guy who took Mo Williams to the Finals.

 

Recently read somewhere that someone apparently said that it's LeBron's last year in Cleveland as he doesn't get along with the owners anymore.

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 

For the upcoming season I think both teams either didnt improve or got slightly worse. IT has a similar game to Irving, so not sure whether hell compliment LBJ nicely. Jae Crowder is a nice addition as it will push JR Smith to the bench, WHERE HE BELONGS. Boston gave up some depth and future upside, for a pg that might be slightly better than IT. Anyway no one comes close to GSW even after the trade

 

Cavs added a player with a "similar game" to Irving, but much better ball distribution. Jae Crowder, a 3 & D player, and Anton Zizic but you think they didn't improve? That doesn't make much sense.

Array
 

You can't look at the trade in a vacuum.

IT is pushing 30 and was up for a max deal. From Boston's perspective that probably wouldn't have made sense, especially with the addition of Hayward, and that their team is good now AND young. This all kind of created incentive for moving IT anyways.

With Kyrie they get a very similar player (a bit better) who is a lot younger, and they'll feel better about his contract when they do have to re sign him. Also just in general moving more money/potential money off the books for when Tatum and Brown need to be re signed.

Considering Lebron seems likely to change teams, and possibly moving to the west with the Lakers, the Celtics are setting themselves up to run the eastern conference for next 4/5 years after this coming season. Trade also makes sense for the Cavs because they probably wouldn't have gotten more for Kyire who didn't want to be there anyways, and they get the best possible pick which is really what they should've been after.

I think it's a win win but you're right that it won't move the needle compared to GSW.

I think Boston could be a scary team in the somewhat near future though.

 

Lol I'm sorry if my "phraseology" isn't up to your standard.

Guys above me were talking about how Boston got the bad end of the deal. I was pointing out how their motivation included things other than just Kyrie versus Isaiah and co. as basketball talent.

There were most likely other factors at play other than just the quality of the players. If outside factors influenced the trade, then you aren't looking at the trade in a vacuum.

 

The craziest thing about this deal is that it's so counter to what I would've expected Boston to do. They were already potentially better than Cavs. So it seems like this is a push to compete in the finals. What they actually seemed to accomplish more than anything, though, is having to deal a max or no max contract. Clearly, the Celts didn't think IT was a super max player. And I agree.

 

While trading IT and Crowder doesn't make the C's better this season, it makes them better in the long run. Kyrie is younger and definitely has some room to grow alongside Hayward, whereas IT is definitely near his peak.

At the end of the day, the strategy for anyone in the East is to wait out Lebron at his peak, and this definitely gives the C's a longer runway for that

 

Quos necessitatibus quisquam voluptas. Fuga expedita et a veniam nisi. Ipsum molestias qui qui et non aut. Dolor est repudiandae commodi. Odit consectetur eum itaque laudantium. Similique omnis possimus quas sed enim numquam.

Totam sed et dolorem aut. Laboriosam quod cum eius ea rerum qui. Consequatur et quos ut et vel suscipit. Ut nesciunt nostrum dolor molestias enim delectus. Est laudantium et eos nulla fuga voluptates repellat voluptatibus.

Debitis iste veniam non ea. Vel a dolorem eveniet optio hic veniam. Quidem aut dignissimos debitis illum. Sed sint sapiente nobis. Corporis dicta perferendis voluptatibus voluptate repellendus.

Nobis quidem reprehenderit dicta cupiditate. Atque perspiciatis ea est consequuntur. Ut assumenda sed incidunt nobis omnis ducimus aut ex. Nihil et est suscipit illo. Velit suscipit illo quos delectus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Guggenheim Partners No 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (23) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (81) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”