Lord of the Billionaire Flies

Picture this: you wake up one morning to find yourself living in a shipping container. You step outside and see that you’re not alone; dozens of shipping containers are strung together on a floating platform, creating a sort of trailer park Alcatraz. You can see a tiny island in the distance, and the GPS on your phone tells you that you’re somewhere in the middle of the South Pacific.

Before long, the other residents begin to emerge from their own shipping containers. They all look the same, which is to say they look the same as you: white, well dressed and groomed, the wrong side of middle aged. More than half are visibly armed, though you wonder against what out here in the middle of nowhere.

Oh, and they’re all billionaires.

Seasteading

In case you missed it this scenario got a little closer to reality over the past week. The Seasteading Institute (founded by Silicon Valley billionaire and free speech champion Peter Thiel) is in the final stages of a deal with the government of French Polynesia for the rights to float their planned penal colony somewhere near the Society Islands (the location is my guess, anywhere else in FP would be too remote to be practical).

The purpose of the exercise is to establish a libertarian utopia, free from the conventions of polite society, where only the opinions of fellow billionaires amount to law. Though no longer publicly associated with the project, Thiel has long been a proponent of individual sovereign nations offshore.

There are more than a couple of really obvious problems with this plan, however.

The location is a big one. When Thiel first started talking about the idea, the vision was for a community 200 miles off the coast of San Francisco in international waters. I could actually see that working, even if just as a curiosity. But French Polynesia might as well be on another planet. I know, I’ve been there. It’s gorgeous and the people are great, but it’s so isolated that it takes days to even get there. Gone is the appeal of proximity to the real world.

That exacerbates the problem of construction, and explains why the early settlers might have to live in tin cans despite their vast wealth. If you look at the current plan being proposed compared to the early artist renditions, things have moved considerably downscale. The handful of billionaires I know aren’t keen to live in a trailer park.

Seastead
What you think your seastead is going to look like.
Waterworld
What it's actually going to look like.

Perhaps the biggest problem with the plan, though, is that it’s already been tried and found wanting.

The Free State Project

Almost two decades ago the libertarian community hatched a plan to take over a US state and turn it into a libertarian paradise. The original plan (and I know this because I was an enthusiastic participant) was to choose a state we thought we could take over and then all move there over a period of five years. Once we took over the electorate, we’d create our utopia, with the ultimate goal of secession and total autonomy.

Fast forward to today. By most rational measures, the Free State Project has been a success. They chose to take over New Hampshire (at which point I tapped out, because fuck the cold), and managed to get enough people to move there that they control a respectable block of the legislature there today.

Then the predictable happened. Libertarians gonna liberty.

The achilles heel of collective action on the part of libertarians is that they’re not big “joiners”. It’s probably the reason the Libertarian Party hasn’t gone anywhere in four decades. Even legislation which most clearly benefits libertarians is often met with, “Yeah, how ‘bout fuck off?” from people who just want to be left alone.

So it didn’t take long for this loose coalition of libertarians in New Hampshire to fracture and break into factions. There exists all sorts of infighting within the movement, and some members have already been excommunicated. Obviously the good people of New Hampshire aren’t particularly enamored with their ideological invaders either.

And I haven’t even mentioned PorcFest, a bacchanalian shitshow of epic proportions. I haven’t attended, but I’ve heard that the drug-fueled orgies are truly a sight to behold. Libertarians gonna liberty.

The Island of Misfit Tax Cheats

So now that the Free State Project has shown us what’s possible, let’s examine what’s likely with regard to our (way, way, way) offshore archipelago of liberty.

The absolute best case for the seasteaders is that they somehow pull off recognition as a sovereign state. This will take some serious payoffs to third-tier governments, but let’s assume for the moment that it can be done. What’s next?

Tax laws. And by tax laws I mean no tax laws. People are probably hoping the islands will become tax havens for billionaires beset on all sides by the unwashed expecting them to pay their fair share. This won’t work for American billionaires, because their government doesn’t give a shit where you make your money in the world, they’re gonna get their pound of flesh. But it’ll be awesome for deposed third world dictators absconding with their national treasuries. Same goes for drug cartel leaders, human traffickers, and global arms dealers. Those guys are gonna make terrific neighbors.

And that brings me to my final point: What happens when shit goes all Lord Of The Flies on Liberty Island?

Think about how little it would take to upset the balance of this delicate ecosystem. Hell, everything could go perfectly to plan and things will probably still devolve all on their own. Put a bunch of well armed billionaire misanthropes together on a 50-acre island and see how long it takes for them to tear each other apart.

I’d certainly pay to watch that, so I hope they sell the TV rights.

14 Comments
 

I remember reading about a group buying a private island from a South American country, and promptly after the sale, that same country's navy 'invaded' to reclaim the island. Sovereignty can be--difficult.

 

Peter Thiel is out of his mind, the guy is basically an anarchist and I'm convinced he endorsed Trump b/c he saw him as a faster way to collapse the American republic. The problem with libertarianism (as I see it) is a lot of it is simply anarchy disguised as libertarianism, some people think small government may as well be no government. We all should have a healthy distrust of Big Brother but people like Thiel take it to another level. This would simply never work because SOMEONE would have to govern this thing and maintain law & order, not to mention the expenses related to maintaining such an island in the middle of nowhere. I mean, are they going to ferry in "the help" everyday?

Array
 
Best Response

you could just do what ben hockett did and buy some land, some solar panels, and be completely self sufficient. sure you have property taxes, but you don't have anyone telling you what to do, which I believe is the crux of libertarian ideals.

also, south pacific is a fucking terrible idea. I bet libertarian billionaires who want to stay in the 21st century start wishing for gummint when their homes get demolished because of rising sea levels or tsunamis.

plus, sovreignty doesn't guarantee protection. what's to stop China or North Korea from conquering said island as a military outpost? you can have a few guys worth a few billion but that's nowhere near enough to fund a military.

it sounds like a utopia, but in practical terms, it just wouldn't work. kinda proves money can buy a lot of things, common sense not being one of them.

 

I had that movie in my head but couldn't put a name to it. SB for you mate.

Absolute truths don't exist... celebrated opinions do.
 

Now imagine this.... you are not one of the billionaires floating along, but instead you are a random person who is a part of their inner circle and you manage to pick up one of their daughters... Can you marry her, divorce her, and take 50%.

...
 

Best case scenario it's going to be a tax-heaven with enhanced secrecy laws. None of the actual hard labour, production and sales that produce wealth take place there, yet somehow that wealth will be registered there. Only a sold-out would recognize that abomination as an independent sovereign state, we already have a lot.

Colourful TV, colourless Life.
 

Having a hard time finding downside to the idea of having the world's most decrepit and morally repugnant people* voluntarily confine themselves to a rather small and isolated target, I mean "space"....

*referring to the third-world dictators, drug cartel members and the like.

I consider myself a Libertarian to a certain degree, though I fall well short of Mr. Thiel. I think you, along with the rest of the posters, have already debunked the myth that this could actually be pulled off, let alone exist for an extended period of time. Might be fun to watch them give it the ol' college try though, hence TV rights as you mentioned ha.

 

Pretty sure I would go rob them. I mean under any other circumstances, no. But saying "Hey we have billions of dollars of wealth secluded on this small undefended Island" is kind of asking for it, isn't it.

Unless they decide they need to hire security. But the security wont be billionaires. So they will need low cost commodities and services. So of course they will need competitive product markets. This will probably take entrepreneurs to run drug and grocery stores etc. But these guys will be running their business so they will probably need some one to bag the groceries. So I guess they can bring in a couple more people.... But Then

 

This Seasteading brings to mind 'Galt's Gulch' - supposedly somewhere in Colorado, in Ayn Rand's book Atlas Shrugged - it's where the various CEO's and masters of industry in Rand's world go when they decide to go on strike and 'stop the engine of the world.' Fictional or not, a forced, artificial society with a skewed demographic would seem to be doomed for failure.

 

Error reprehenderit vel dolor maiores possimus quia consequatur non. Sint placeat perspiciatis quibusdam inventore. Velit et tempore qui dolor assumenda.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.6%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.6%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”