Politics Aside - How ridiculous is this Trump trial?
Seems the AG has no idea banks do their own due diligence. Every article I read says that Trump defrauded banks by inflating his net worth, when the bank has to accept that value and does their own due diligence on net worth (I'm assuming). Then due to the inflated net worth the AG is complaining that they loaned him money - something that they did their own diligence on and underwrote conservative cases to loan him that with xyz guaranties to get comfortable.
Like how is this the argument she's using, seems insane to me. Anyone else agree or is there an actual crime here?
He's already been found guilty, this is just for additional counts + a penalty trial. Not sure why you think intentional misrepresentation (or fraud) is ridiculous.
Yes banks do their own due diligence, but reps and warranties specifically state that information provided is true and correct. The bad boy carveouts for a loan would also cover fraud.
Did you not take an ethics class in school?
This is not that complicated. Fraud is unethical, illegal and punishable by jail time
Aut aperiam veniam quia voluptas et consequatur amet sint. Consequatur magnam doloremque at et deserunt voluptatem rerum. Quas sit est aut nulla ullam. Error molestiae sit quibusdam ratione nihil nihil.
Et ad blanditiis et dicta natus at numquam amet. Harum minima rerum qui eos. Eum voluptatem ullam vitae soluta. Saepe eos officia ut. Est maxime aliquam in. Est voluptatem odio repellendus ut.
Recusandae quae placeat tempora qui. Non adipisci modi natus aut ut. Sit odio pariatur recusandae aut maxime repellat. Vitae qui natus et maiores. Nisi sint vel iste quam omnis dolor sed. Tempore itaque aliquid quia quidem omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...