The salaries I see here--they're too low.
I'm a little confused, but I've never actually worked in finance so please don't mock my stupid questions too much. Or go ahead, but just be funny about it.
So I read on another post on WSO about working 80-110 hour work weeks to get paid $120k. Also on a couple of posts here and on other WS related sites I've seen all-in compensation on the low end in the low six figures. This is far from the millions you read about in the mainstream media, such as the recent column in the New York Times by that "wealth addict" asshat, and I can't imagine it's the norm.
Or is it?
Outside of finance we have these huge expectations for financiers at the big hedge funds (Tudor, Tiger cubs, Citadel, etc.) to be raking in $300k starting as a jr. analyst, and financiers at smaller funds ($1b AUM) or investment banks to be raking in at least $150k. The numbers people actually post here seem much lower.
Can someone explain this? Is it just that bankers make less than people outside the industry think?
Also, why don't people quit to trade their own money--or is this very common? For instance, the guy working 80-110 hours for $120k mentioned above gets about $25 per hour. That's shit pay. Is the point of working in finance to hold out, tolerate a few years of low pay, to break into the ranks of the millionaires? Or did 2008 just decimate compensation to the point where pay-per-hour has gone down the toilet? Or all of the above?
If anyone could educate me on all of this, I'd be really grateful.
The hours are a lot better at the VP and greater level. I think @"CompBanker" said that he was working about 50 hr/wk as a PE VP. The hours are a lot better in PE than IB. @"Aaron Burr" retired from IB to work in PE.
remember that's 120k straight out of college at 21/22 years old, increases exponentially from there
at what age does it start to taper off?
Analysts are not suppose to make millions. They are suppose to move up the ladder and enter better positions, whether it be upper level IB, senior management at a F500, hedge fund, PE, etc.
Not sure how you're senior management at an F500, at a hedge fund, or in PE and not making millions in your 40s and 50s and beyond.
So, you think that being a "financier" is some all encompassing term, and that a single data point on comp and hrs/week is sufficient to conclude that "financiers" are underpaid?
Sounds like a troll. Quit to trade their own money? You really think someone out of college (with probably an average net worth of zero or less) can make > $120K/yr day trading? Anyway, I think you greatly overestimate the abilities and opportunity cost of the average student going into finance.
The point is to learn. Your getting out of college with an attitude that's a mixture of cocky, scared, and excited, you don't know shit period. Doesn't matter how many times you've done a re-run on Rosenbaum IB, or how many lbo models you've designed with online courses, your skills are basically next to nothing, even less if your on the investing side. On top of this wonderful realization, you're making six figures right out of college, and you call that low? The reason people in this industry have ever made money is due to the value they add, nobody's paying you shit for your Wharton Undergrad, they'll pay you for the value you add, and as you move up (read up on the new PM post) you hopefully pick up skills that translate to added value over the course of a few years. I think it's been mentioned several times here that real, and I mean real (High six figures/Early Seven) figures are made with at least 10 years of solid experience in this field. It ain't easy, and not everybody can do it, and it's definitely not a "fast" track, but if you can bear through all the hell that will rein down your ass, you'll do pretty damn good.
--
speculative_attack lol yes, because that's all there is to PE is knowing VBA.
If that's true, that PE firm should disband the analyst class. The way you characterize the fact that you "know more excel" than them shows that you just don't get it - excel is a tool to help analyze and it's not a contest on who can use VBA quicker than the person next to you.
So why are you working in consulting if you were the equivalent of a PE associate as an intern?
120k right out of school---while all of the lawyers, doctors, phds are borrowing that much to go to school.
I've come to realize that banking exists with the mindset that things will always get better, brighter, easier, shorter hours, better pay, exit ops, exit ops, and exit ops.
I suppose this mindset becomes more true depending on long you can stick around.
put my comment in wrong place - whoops!
I like this guy. My comp should be higher!
But on a serious note, you do realize that $120k for your first year out of college is almost 2.5x the median household income in the U.S., right?
Relevant username, OP.
Today it is usual, bro. Just take it for granted and try to improve your income in different ways. Freelancing can be good.
It sucks at the junior level. After 6-10 years, make VP/Director, 200-250k base + bonus is not bad.
$120K does seem low. Most first year analysts in our group make about $160K all in. There's not a huge variance for talent, but there is some (80-100% bonus). For 2nd, 3rd years, it can get up to $210K all in.
When you get to a senior level of any industry, including starting your own business and growing it, the income could / should be significantly more than that 120k. Also, in many fields you'll work your ass off to accelerate your career, grow a business, etc.
Don't think about $25 / hr for 100 hours /week being crap pay. Focus on learning as much as you can. It's actually great pay compared to the entrepreneurs who start with nothing, work their tail off, and maybe succeed down stream. It's great pay compared to the med school student who makes rounds for 100 hours a week for NO MONEY. It's great comp compared to the law school student who's blurry eyed from reading court cases for 80 hours a week for NO MONEY. They all get paid quite well later and so do the IB analysts whether or not they stay in banking.
Autem autem qui sint asperiores corporis et omnis. Aut quidem laudantium asperiores in laborum eum repellendus consequatur. Aspernatur rerum qui dicta corrupti ut omnis. Dolorem reiciendis dolores aperiam.
Aut aperiam voluptates numquam officiis ratione praesentium praesentium. Sed nihil et minus ratione aliquid eum nam. Facilis ab est repudiandae qui labore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Corporis consequatur ducimus porro qui ducimus eos. Quae iste ducimus atque aut vel possimus aut vel.
Et nisi debitis exercitationem laborum eaque aut nulla. Ut et dolores aut quia est. Consequatur aliquid in aliquam a. Aut nisi aut sapiente veritatis. Et laboriosam facere suscipit unde reiciendis non.
Illum et at quam nostrum beatae qui. Asperiores soluta quibusdam quis sunt. In ipsam deleniti quia voluptates qui voluptate sint. Voluptas sunt distinctio repudiandae officiis fuga sit est. Consequuntur in est quis voluptas. Placeat officiis in est aut rerum. Aut quod beatae eos aliquid ea amet esse sed.
Occaecati eius excepturi perferendis laboriosam vel. Quam dicta sit provident est doloribus qui dolores sed. Quia in vero facere non vitae dolorem. Magni mollitia sit recusandae iste. Vitae et est vero est et quidem voluptas qui.