Trending Content
+109 | Fucking quit today | 32 | 35m | |
+86 | Waiting for a Girl | 34 | 13h | |
+79 | Finance Fiction Sub-Forum? | 17 | 3d | |
+69 | Are banking MDs happy with their life? | 21 | 19h | |
+68 | Remember to take care of yourself | 8 | 2d | |
+52 | Is it a bad idea not to save anything as a junior? | 28 | 9h | |
+35 | Staying Busy When Laid Off | 12 | 13h | |
+30 | Good jokes for interview? | 16 | 17h | |
+29 | NYC Social Clubs (Soho House & Others) | 9 | 3d | |
+27 | MD added me on Snapchat. What to do? | 10 | 4d |
Career Resources
Oh I get it bro. So when WE storm the capital and beat a cop to death it’s a “riot” and “inappropriate” but when the LIBERALS tear down our countries statues and ban us from Twitter it’s “civil protest”. F*cking hypocrites I swear bro, I’m the only one that gets it.
Missed satire. Too much rum.
Can't tell if you don't know its satire or you are satiring his satire.
Stfu; “I’m the only who who gets it” lol what? Sounding real rootin tootin conservative snowflake right now.
This is a great parody bit, good work
A private company can do whatever it wants. Remember the gay wedding cake? #Snowflake bruh get over it, you lost and then cried about it and then your people stormed the capitol in a failed coup and will all rot in prison for treason. None of the participants in the coup were real Americans. They were terrorists. Send them to Guantanamo. #YouSad?
Private company can do whatever it wants..... except open its doors during a pandemic
Hey now! Liberals and Conversatives are all the same. Lets all come together as one. We are all more similar than we think.. Remember now, liberals also beat cops to death now. You see they both share similar interest of killing cops.
They’re also both mental 18 year olds with a knack for false parallels. Way more similar than they think.
Damn I was on fire that day.
And when storming of the capitol happened, 95% of conservatives that I know where ashamed and disavowed the event. Still waiting on the majority of liberals to stop justifying BLM riots.
Just came across this, hope you enjoy:
Ummm ok????
Conservatives that you know, maybe. Overall, 45% of Republicans support the storming of the Capitol building. And yes, I know Conservative =/= Republican but close enough.
source: https://www.newsweek.com/45-percent-republican-voters-support-storming-…
Un-American
I have never seen one liberal minded person here post a comment here supporting any BLM violence. Stop making shit up.
They are excusing violence, rationalizing it, and minimizing it nonstop. Well it's not that many violent people.......well it's mostly peaceful.....well their cause is legitimate. It's simple. If you don't stand for violence, say it and that's it. No explanations necessary. Let's start doing that.
NoEquityResearch is spot on. Not to mention many Democrat governors and mayors calling a violent takeover of city block the “summer of love” and the media saying “who said all protests have to be peaceful?”
This is like asking liberals in the 60s to condemn the civil rights marches of MLK. lol brother you’re gonna go down in history on the wrong side but you know that as well as I do. Keep kicking and screaming snowflake.
You are exactly right and I am sure at the time, it was unpopular but decades we have learned from it and realize that protesting is legit. MLK did not support violent protests and neither should anyone on this forum.
Not the same at all. I'm not asking anyone to disavow peaceful BLM protests. The right to protest is great. If someone wants to peacefully protest police brutality, I'll even join them! What I'm against is violence and riots.
What's interesting is that I was recently watching a documentary about civil rights leaders from the 60s and one of the things that the leaders were talking about was how much they were set back by violent protests and riots back then.
The exact same thing is playing out today. When George Floyed was killed, support for BLM went through the roof. When the violence started taking center stage, polls showed a major drop in support. If you support BLM and civil rights, you should be the first person to disavow violent behavior as it hurts the movement.
See one of the polls from back in September below:
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/516699-poll-support-for-black-lives-m…
See also this great video by MLK on non-violence. First 10 minutes covers non violence but the whole video overall is really good:
Oh, I see, so anecdotal evidence counts? When the BLM protests escalated into riots, 95% of the liberals I know were ashamed and disavowed the violence.
I guess we're all equal now? Except for the whole "one group tried to overthrow the government and the other just wanted the police to stop murdering them with impunity" part, I guess...
The Trump cult is thriving on WSO. BLM has a legitimate cause and it sometimes gets out of control while Trumpists were trying to over throw the US government. If you do not see how these things are different, I am not sure what to say.
Dude, if Proud Boys went and shot up a black church after organizing on Facebook, our WSO warriors would just respond "but why didn't you say anything when BLM was looting?"
You just can't reason with these people.
Amen. We got the Y’all Qaeda crowd on WSO
Vanilla Isis
Haven't seen your response in the other thread yet? "overthrow US government" what a joke
I'm having a major Nostradamus moment here.
It's not even the same. One was protesting racial inequality and police brutality after witnessing the murders of blacks across the nation, while the other was a bunch of non-target losers marching on the fucking country's capital - that's fucking insurrection and treason, they need to be tried and hanged.
Non target is a compliment for these people. I am sure many of them do not even have a high school degree.
Studied at the School of Hard Knocks according to Facebook
Oh come on there were definitely a handful of Ivy alumni in that crowd. Trump is a Penn graduate after all.
DB IS NOT A BB
thx BB
For the good of the country, republicans in congress and in his administration, need to convince the POTUS to resign. Impeaching him again just draws more attention to this fiasco. Going ahead and invoking the 25th amendment would be an embarrassment for the USA. Resignation was the republican strategy for Nixon for far less egregious offenses. I am hoping that republican leadership will stand up and persuade him to leave.
Biden takes office in 10 days. There really is 0 need for Trump to resign or be impeached this late into this term...
If you believe that Trump incited and or supported a violent insurrection, then there should be consequences, partly to send a message to future politicians who might act this way. If you think he acted appropriately, then there would be no need for any consequences, I think we are going to have to agree to disagree on this one.
Aut est iste soluta facere neque non occaecati. Molestiae aperiam tempora possimus quia quisquam rem omnis. Amet impedit ut labore dolor iusto similique vel.
Eligendi sunt ducimus aut voluptas eum cum. Officia omnis quia et. Optio cum qui eligendi et delectus quo. Officiis quasi odit molestias perferendis totam distinctio. Deserunt iste quos molestiae esse quia praesentium.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quo quia aut aut provident optio est. Et expedita nesciunt placeat omnis dolorem est fugit.
Unde saepe nostrum voluptas optio aliquid hic. Nostrum repudiandae vitae rerum. Nobis fuga illum sed id qui.
Aut consequuntur omnis molestiae. Blanditiis sequi nulla facilis excepturi sunt voluptas laboriosam. Voluptatem unde enim beatae aliquid. Ipsam sequi maiores dolore sit repellendus.
Dolorum delectus ratione id incidunt sit ad molestiae. Ipsum aliquam non porro nesciunt tempore animi explicabo.
Cupiditate nihil autem voluptatem voluptatem id ducimus. Ut omnis eos ea consequuntur eos eveniet sit.