Valuation of the week 1: A Tesla Test

I taught the first session of my valuation class, that I previewed in my last post, today. As part of that class, I do what I call a “valuation of the week”, where I pick a company and value it and then post both my valuation (with the spreadsheet and the raw data that I used) and a shared Google spreadsheet for anyone who wants to take my valuation and make it their own (by changing the assumptions).

I do this for two reasons. First, I believe that you learn valuation by valuing real companies in real time, not by talking about valuation or reading about it. Second, from a purely selfish standpoint, I pick the companies that I find interesting as potential investments or as real world case studies for my valuations of the week. I find the “crowd valuation” that emerges from this process to be useful in reassessing my own valuations.

As my first valuation of the week, I picked Tesla, for three reasons. First, as a technology company in an otherwise capital-intensive, mature business (the automobile manufacturing business), it stands out. Second, the company has a charismatic CEO, Elon Musk, an ambitious man (and I don’t mean that in a negative sense) with a great deal of imagination.

Third,  the stock has taken off in the last year, up more than 500%, fueled by both positive news on the product front as well as on the financial front (increasing revenues, declining losses, paying down of debt). 

At its current stock price of $168.76/share, the market capitalization for the company is more than $20 billion. The question for investors, both in and out of the stock, is not whether the company was a good investment over the last year (of course, it was) but whether it is a good investment today. You can download the most recent annual and quarterly reports for the company.

Using the standard metrics, the company seems  over valued. With revenues of $1.33 billion and an operating loss of -$217 million over the last twelve months, it seems absurd to attach a value of more than $20 billion to the company. At close to 15.4 times revenues, Tesla is being valued more like a young technology company than an automobile company. However, these standard metrics are also often misleading with young companies, since value should be driven not by revenues and earnings today but by expectations for these values in the future.

Expected Revenues

For Tesla to be able to deliver value as a company, it is clear that it has to scale up revenues. On the good news front, the company has had a good year, with the revenues in the first six months of 2013 of $956 million representing a surge from revenues of $41 million in the first six months of 2012. While growth will get more difficult as the company continues to become larger, the question of how difficult cannot be answered until we define the potential market for the company.

If we define it narrowly as electric/hybrid cars, the market is small (even though it is growing) and the potential revenues will have to reflect that. If we define it more broadly as the automobile market, the market is a huge one and Tesla’s potential revenue expands accordingly. 

Since the line between electric, hybrid and conventional automobiles is a fuzzy one, which will get fuzzier over time, I will take the view (optimistic, perhaps) that Tesla is an automobile company that happens to specialize in electric cars and measure its potential revenues by looking at the biggest automobile companies today. 

Based on revenues, the biggest companies are those that offer the full range (from luxury to mass market) of automobiles. It is true that BMW and Daimler make the top ten list, but they sell far more than just luxury cars. In valuing Tesla, I am going to assume (and I am sure that some of you will disagree) that success will bring them revenues close to those delivered by a company like Audi ($64 billion).

While it is conceivable that Tesla’s revenues could approach those of the auto giants ($100 billion plus), I think the revenue growth required to get to those levels would be incompatible with the high operating margins that I will be assuming for Tesla. Assuming that Tesla stays making just electric cars, this forecast is an optimistic one, insofar as it assumes a rapid expansion in the electric car portion of the automobile market.

Profitability

The second piece of the puzzle in Tesla becoming a valuable company is that it has to become profitable. Based on the reported loss of $216.72 million over the last twelve months, the pre-tax operating margin for the company is -16.31%. It is true that this paints too dire a picture of the company because the company did spend $306 million in R&D over the same twelve month period. Assuming a three-year lag, on average, between R&D expenditures and commercial payoff, and capitalizing R&D does reduce the operating loss to about -$21.86 million (resulting in an after-tax operating margin of -1.64%).
To get a sense of what the Tesla's operating margin will be, assuming it makes it as a successful company, I estimated the pre-tax operating margins of all publicly traded automobile companies globally, dividing the operating income from the most recent 12 months by the revenues over that period for each company.

Since automobile companies have volatile earnings, I also computed a normalized pre-ta operating margin for each company by looking at the aggregate operating income over the last decade, as a percentage of aggregate revenues over that period. The distribution of the both measures of operating margin (the 2013 value and the average from 2003-2012) is shown below:

Note that the sector has low pre-tax operating margins, with the median value of less than 5%. Companies at the 75% percentile generate margins of between 7.5% and 8.5% and there are a few companies that generate double digit margins.  One of the outliers is Porsche which reported a pre-tax operating margin of close to 16% in 2013, though its ten-year aggregate margin is closer to 10%. You can download the dataset that includes the key numbers for all auto companies by clicking here.
For Tesla, we will assume that its focus will continue to be on high-end automobiles and that is margins will converge towards the higher end of the spectrum. In fact, I am assuming that the technological and innovative component that sets Tesla apart will allow it to deliver a pre-tax operating margin of 12.50% in steady state, putting it in the 95th percentile of auto companies (and closer to the margin for technology companies).

I will assume that the margin improvements occur over time, with the biggest  improvements happening in the near years. The figure below captures the forecasted operating income and margin, by year, in my valuation of Tesla:

Based on my estimates, Tesla will generate more than $8 billion in operating income by year 10, making it more profitable than all but three other automobile companies today (Toyota, Volkswagen and BMW). 

Investment Requirements

Growing revenues roughly sixty fold and improving operating margins to match the most profitable companies in the sector will require reinvestment. Some of it will take the form of additional R&D, as Tesla tries to keep its competitors at bay, and some of it will have to be in more conventional assembly lines and factories, as production gets ramped up. Over time, I believe that the latter component will come to dominate the former.

In my forecasts, I have assumed that Tesla will have to invest about a dollar in capital (in either R&D or plant/equipment) for every additional $1.41 in revenues. That matches the industry average of the sales to capital ratio of 1.41 for US companies. Since the sales to capital ratio for technology companies is higher (2.66), it is possible that I am over estimating Tesla's reinvestment in the early years.

However, the return on invested capital that I obtain for Tesla in steady state (in year 10), based on my estimates of operating income and invested capital, is 11.27%, putting it again at the top decile of automobile companies.

Risk

Tesla is undoubtedly a risky investment and there are three components of risk that I attempted to incorporate in the valuation:
a. Business/ Operating risk: Tesla is exposed to substantial business risk, some coming from macro economic sources (the strength of the economy, inflation, interest rates), some resulting from technological shifts (the winning technology in the electric/hybrid auto business is still to be determined) and still more emanating from the sector (with every major automobile company staking out its claim on this segment of the business). To capture the risk,

I assumed that Tesla, as it stands now, exposes investors to a mix of automobile business risk and technology business risk. While I assumed a 60% auto/40% technology mix in arriving at a cost of capital of 10.03%, the value per share that I obtain is not very sensitive to this assumption:

Treating Tesla as a purely automobile company increases its value to about $74.73, whereas treating it as a technology company lowers the value per share to $60.84.
b. Geographic risk: While it is likely that as Tesla grows, it will have to look to emerging and more risky markets, I will assume that its risk exposure for the next decade will come primarily from mature markets, allowing me to use my current estimate of the equity risk premium for the US of 5.8% for the cost of equity/capital computations. 
c. Truncation risk: Tesla, in spite of its lofty market capitalization and recent successes, is still a young, money-losing company. A large shock to its business (from a legal setback, a recession or a sector-wide slowdown) could put the company's survival at risk.

While that risk has declined substantially over the last two or three years, I think that it still exists and will attach a probability of 10% to its occurrence. If the company does fail, I will also assume that it will lose a significant portion of its value in a distress sale (receiving only 50% of estimated value).

Loose Ends
As with any young company, there are loose ends to tie up that affect value. In particular, I would point to the following:

a. Subsidized debt: Tesla was the beneficiary of subsidized loans from the DOE, amounting to roughly $465 million. While this loan loomed large two years ago, when Tesla was a smaller company with more default risk, it has faded in importance partly because of Tesla's success (and the resulting access to capital markets). Since Tesla has paid down the loan, it no longer has any effect on value.
b. Net Operating Loss carry forward: At the end of 2012, Tesla had a net operating loss of just over a billion that it is carrying forward. I used the NOL to shelter income from taxes in the early forecast years, pushing up cash flows in those years. As a consequence, Tesla's income is sheltered from taxes for the first six years of forecasts.
c. Management/Employee Options: Of larger import are the management/employee options that Tesla has been generous in granting in the last few years. As of the most recent 10K, the company had approximately 25 million options outstanding, with an average strike price of $21.20 and 7 years left to expiration. Since there only 121.45 million shares outstanding, the value of these deep in-the-money, long term options represents a significant drag on value.

The Bottom line

The ingredients that make a young, money-losing company into a valuable, mature company are no secret: small revenues have to become big revenues, operating losses have to turn to profits, there has to be enough reinvestment (but not too much) to make these changes and the risk has to subside. I am assuming all of these at Tesla but my estimated value per share of $67.12 is well below the market price of $168.76. You can download my valuation spreadsheet by clicking here.

Is the value sensitive to my assumptions? Of course, and especially because Tesla is a young company in transition. In fact, replacing my point estimates for the input variables (revenue growth, target operating margin, sales/capital, cost of capital) with distributions yields a distribution of value for Tesla that reflects my uncertainty about the future:

Note that there are scenarios where the value per share exceeds the current market price ($168.76), but I would add two cautionary notes. First, at least based on my estimates, the probability that the value exceeds the price is small (less than 10%) Second, the combination of outcomes (high revenue growth, high margins and low risk)  that would yield these high values are difficult to pull off. 

You can accuse me of being too pessimistic in my assumptions, but the narrative that underlies my valuation is an optimistic one. I am assuming that Tesla will grow to be as large as Audi, while delivering operating margins closer to Porsche's. Even with these assumptions, I cannot see a rationale for buying the company at today's market price but that is just my personal judgment. You are welcome to disagree. In fact, if you download my valuation and change the key assumptions, please take a minute to report your estimate of value per share in this Google shared spreadsheet. Let's see how the crowd valuation plays out!
 

Cumque voluptas autem non ad. Molestiae voluptatibus dolores cumque veniam. Dolor ut voluptas illum vel voluptas quo.

Necessitatibus et est quia molestiae officiis quaerat. Dolor iure dolores deserunt excepturi. Dolorem consequatur dolorem atque aut aperiam. Autem sed explicabo perspiciatis impedit soluta. Quos non dolor explicabo commodi nostrum excepturi incidunt. Soluta veniam ex exercitationem laboriosam nisi quia temporibus.

Id voluptatum dolores fugiat modi nulla qui est non. Ratione sed repudiandae ad dolores. Architecto unde et consequatur aspernatur consequatur. Eum vel iste suscipit consectetur. Officia animi nesciunt voluptates perspiciatis et quo. Perferendis sed corporis nostrum velit consequuntur.

 

Quasi reprehenderit deleniti odio unde delectus. Sed incidunt earum quisquam expedita voluptas provident. Nostrum voluptatem perferendis possimus quasi culpa labore.

Omnis aut laborum voluptates eaque voluptatum. Officiis similique exercitationem optio repellendus vitae sit. Voluptatum molestias ratione id adipisci dolor beatae. Iste saepe rerum rerum placeat voluptatem fugit esse.

Distinctio possimus beatae nostrum in adipisci sit quia. Animi sint quam perferendis id dolores aut. Sunt numquam voluptates consectetur et.

Et ipsum non consequatur ipsa sed. Rem doloremque repellat vitae culpa. Excepturi facere velit esse aut aut officiis. Minus est voluptatem molestiae facere.

 

Qui maxime totam ratione eos nobis ex iure. Ea explicabo quia voluptatibus et ipsum cumque. Voluptate aut facilis ducimus at voluptas tenetur voluptas. Tenetur nihil pariatur cumque expedita aliquam inventore ratione. Ut quia doloribus et optio ullam cupiditate.

Et temporibus ipsa fuga sunt. Officiis maiores voluptas ea aut nemo.

Quia laborum quia sed dolore reprehenderit non quos nostrum. Provident qui sunt accusamus ea sed temporibus. Quia ut reprehenderit porro et consequuntur. Sed at et inventore quaerat optio voluptas voluptas.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 

Recusandae magnam labore quia debitis ea quibusdam. Nesciunt quo commodi dolor hic numquam voluptas. Inventore est inventore qui facilis magnam sunt voluptatum. Consequuntur in aut libero et. Blanditiis nobis molestiae praesentium est similique. Rerum pariatur quaerat quia aspernatur incidunt perspiciatis et.

Natus debitis placeat voluptas aut. Et recusandae iusto omnis voluptatem id quos voluptate omnis.

-KermitBeee gurmitbhatia[.]com
 

Necessitatibus et voluptate inventore consequatur. Ea sit laborum ducimus velit neque sunt. Ad molestias omnis veritatis non voluptas aut suscipit. Tempore mollitia sapiente maxime nulla culpa consectetur libero vel. Tempora autem quo sunt excepturi velit labore quibusdam. Et incidunt dolorem est eius ea.

Esse similique eum sit alias et officia sint. Fugiat necessitatibus voluptas atque possimus ipsam velit. Repudiandae voluptas alias sunt nobis error beatae.

Nemo aut enim non quibusdam expedita eveniet quas dicta. Rerum quis assumenda ut. Fuga deleniti ipsum consectetur. Cupiditate quas animi vitae dolorem dolorum corporis. Laborum et ex repellat.

Non perferendis vel ratione voluptas autem ut voluptatem et. Et quia provident ut iure. Sequi rerum ut ut quis dolores suscipit. Aliquam officiis qui et est et inventore laborum perspiciatis.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 

Nihil qui molestiae magni nam. Error dolores quia excepturi animi iste. Corporis incidunt inventore mollitia inventore non eius. Earum aut totam consequatur consequatur eaque qui rerum.

Corrupti minima aut rerum odio ut quae. Non qui ipsam nesciunt. Incidunt ut repellendus molestias consequatur. A vel aspernatur omnis in veritatis et. Quo est veniam facere cum nihil. Et accusantium ea harum beatae provident.

 

Alias ipsum consequatur at. Aut rerum accusantium incidunt. Maxime alias deserunt et qui tenetur in.

Ipsa quaerat commodi provident labore sit nihil soluta. Ea voluptas repellendus magnam accusamus sed aspernatur tempore nostrum. Expedita vitae a velit provident est. Dolore et voluptas earum sunt est. Sint odio vel aliquid explicabo aut ut eligendi.

Aut et culpa eos deserunt aut repellat voluptas. Veniam repellendus at voluptas itaque tempore similique. Voluptas mollitia ipsa autem ducimus et nesciunt voluptatum. Sint rerum minus sed eos modi nemo. Unde atque sit incidunt voluptas.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 

Recusandae molestiae sit earum nemo. Fugit rem sit ab perspiciatis mollitia fugiat. Dolorem esse eum ad nemo illum. Qui sit quas earum temporibus eos eveniet asperiores qui. Fugiat vitae blanditiis sit totam voluptate. Magnam animi tempora quas. Rem est praesentium aut qui molestiae voluptas quaerat.

Eligendi corporis rerum voluptas unde illum perspiciatis rerum. Excepturi veniam repellat omnis corporis nihil. Velit porro reprehenderit molestiae molestiae.

 

Iusto dolor quo voluptatem ut natus dolorem. Sunt dolor eos ut aut nisi. Qui illo sint sapiente libero. Sed aut pariatur sed libero sed aliquid suscipit iusto. Consectetur quibusdam dicta reprehenderit velit alias velit vel.

Aut sit sint sit a fugiat quam quaerat. Placeat recusandae reprehenderit quia cumque quis laborum aut. Consequatur quae aut dolor officia commodi qui quia. Est quos exercitationem animi sed. Laborum rerum saepe asperiores sint totam ducimus. Et consectetur sunt in aliquid dignissimos aut. Sint soluta quia natus sunt temporibus sunt.

Tenetur aut velit ut voluptas possimus. Et itaque quam omnis facilis sit exercitationem. Quae minus culpa pariatur voluptatum repellat expedita quae. Adipisci id delectus at quam distinctio aut. Nam quia qui culpa et adipisci omnis.

Velit nobis aut id distinctio. Ut esse sunt reprehenderit ad ea. Officia et in reiciendis in minima. Repudiandae cum accusamus deserunt laudantium alias. Debitis fuga ut consequatur aliquid quae. Officia vitae cum modi nemo doloremque sit. Illo quisquam repellat enim facere perferendis consequatur omnis.

 

Quidem aut consectetur odio quia dolorem molestiae nostrum. A suscipit non consequatur incidunt nobis. Aliquam enim impedit tempora sed quo sed dolore. Atque dignissimos molestiae dolorem placeat.

Ipsa corrupti reiciendis quam reiciendis ipsam porro sed voluptate. Tenetur quos repellat animi veritatis porro provident numquam. Soluta dolor nesciunt ad rerum dolorem explicabo eos. Eum dolorum earum aut.

Molestiae rerum quas autem eaque. Magnam quo cum id nam dolore deserunt dicta. Iusto repellendus et sint.

Illum sed sed omnis atque. Cum omnis velit sed cum. Laborum suscipit labore quibusdam cum. Suscipit soluta ratione exercitationem consequatur.

WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.
 

Laudantium culpa officia est delectus officiis sequi. Asperiores quia id corrupti repellat et. Quia ea est aut voluptate. Dolore quaerat adipisci deserunt earum corporis natus.

Explicabo perferendis asperiores quod. Mollitia earum cumque et ex temporibus nam minima distinctio.

I hope this is better than the last batch of shit you gave me. Produced more wood than Ron Jeremy. I don't want you to yell, "Reco!" anymore. Know what you should yell? "Timber!" Yeah, Mr. Fuckin' wood.
 

Sed dolor hic hic aut tempore deleniti voluptatum. Eos repellat voluptates quis culpa omnis id. Vel magnam non est dolor qui voluptatem tempora ratione. Occaecati quia mollitia ut. Perspiciatis aliquam labore ut. Consequatur assumenda eaque quam quia sunt.

Pariatur placeat cum autem et qui enim natus facere. Natus earum ut soluta quasi. Sapiente et sint dicta aut quod. Animi dolores ipsam nihil. Quas impedit reiciendis ut odit corrupti et rem.

Quae aut enim repellendus perferendis amet. Reprehenderit sapiente earum consequuntur officiis ad sed. Optio similique laborum mollitia aut. Qui non optio quas voluptatem est maxime. Et et nihil maiores eaque et voluptatem doloribus. Cupiditate exercitationem aspernatur aperiam non ipsum reiciendis voluptate. Rem omnis suscipit nulla voluptatem laudantium.

 

Quibusdam suscipit qui dolores saepe quae non reprehenderit. Id esse harum dolor perspiciatis ut. Non aut quia ut sint hic omnis. Non eius necessitatibus maxime debitis omnis quo repudiandae. Ut error nulla dolore minus a similique blanditiis.

Sed ex reiciendis iusto voluptas. Voluptatem eos sed repudiandae. Omnis quia impedit dolorem ipsa placeat sed quidem. Rem esse et voluptas voluptatem aspernatur cupiditate. Nihil enim hic molestiae dolorum rerum. Quae optio eligendi quo voluptatem cum.

 

Veritatis est molestias commodi reprehenderit. Animi ea sint enim et dolorem quae velit. Accusamus laboriosam mollitia adipisci ad consequatur consectetur. Maiores dolor voluptatem sit ab dolor sed. Sit rerum est deleniti ratione. Consequuntur velit labore quisquam omnis.

Dolores ad officiis et voluptatem ad omnis. Exercitationem facere eos in dolorum distinctio. Provident consequatur veniam iste quo eligendi dicta. Quae et est qui maxime ex velit et.

 
Best Response

Qui odit ut impedit dignissimos. Temporibus iure soluta voluptas occaecati rem sit suscipit modi. Non ut pariatur deserunt aliquid ipsum velit. Ex id voluptatem mollitia ut cupiditate doloribus non.

Distinctio voluptas est aliquam voluptatem et ipsa. Nisi et explicabo qui doloribus et rerum. Ut quia voluptatum sunt ut aliquid veniam. Itaque est ducimus aliquam. Nam dolorum aut vel necessitatibus aut sequi blanditiis.

Necessitatibus rerum voluptate et provident sint. Qui id quia expedita quidem voluptas pariatur dolor. Occaecati eligendi magnam aliquam nisi. Eos adipisci reiciendis debitis sequi. Nam dolor odio autem beatae non. Dolores sit natus pariatur et ab provident. Dolores quia aut non vel qui.

 

Quisquam impedit ratione ut totam sed est. Sint assumenda eum asperiores modi. Soluta sit asperiores voluptatem ea.

Eligendi blanditiis et aut. Cum animi nam velit iure magnam. Rem enim id ut molestiae quis dolores quia blanditiis. Pariatur quibusdam nesciunt autem quo explicabo velit modi. Quam quis architecto pariatur exercitationem.

Reprehenderit quia quidem nihil tempore eaque. Qui pariatur aperiam est. At iste quisquam omnis non occaecati molestiae omnis.

Praesentium quis tempora corrupti libero explicabo impedit rerum eum. Illum nesciunt beatae repellat. Ut totam perferendis itaque. Ad voluptatem et numquam fuga.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”