What do MDs, Directors, and VPs do at their computers?

If they're not working in excel or powerpoint...what are they doing? VPs I can kind of understand as some of them are checking excel backups and editing stuff in PPT. Still, you can't be checking work or giving comments all day long. And what do MDs and Directors do exactly? There's a director in my group who I see sitting at his computer all day long. He doesn't travel to client meetings much (not sure why). So...what could he be doing all day long?

19 Comments
 

That’s where you’re wrong- you CAN give comments all day. As a VP, all I do is stare at my screen to help me brainstorm on how I can create more unnecessary work for my analysts. I’m talking about 20 pages for the appendix that no one will see, LBOs out the ass with a million different scenarios, none of which will make sense. Formatting for internal shit that no one will look at is also very important. People think that being a VP is about doing deals, talking to clients, but they’re wrong. It’s about doing 77 turns on a 100 page deck on a 5% minority stake stale in a $100mm EV Lithuanian shitco. That’s where the value add is and nothing gets me off more than providing bullshit comments to torture people. 

 
Funniest

I like to crawl beneath the bull pen line and tuck myself under a nearby desk so I can listen to what analysts are doing something cool and when, then I pick the kids with the best plans and ruin them with pitch decks for companies I’m not interested in. 

Then I pop up, say “we used to sleep on yoga mats under our desks back in my day you fucking sloths” and go back to my office. 

 

Not in IB so maybe take this thematically rather than literally, but we sort of do check work or give comments all day long.

Sometimes i'll have to read myself back into the project I'm focusing on. Then I'm re-reading something that's been sent to me to see if I have more comments. 

While the team is turning that, I might have some emails to send (i.e., today I received a question about a previous deal for someone new wanting to get up to speed). 

Then there's meetings to prepare for - it's not just the materials, but also making sure you're thinking through all the questions you'll receive and if we have the materials to cover those. What risks might be flagged? Do we think we're covered and how do I convey the commercial terms protecting us in that instance?

All of the ruminating above might lead to more materials, comments, or changes I need the team to make (or I make myself). 

Once things are coming together, I'll jump into the excel models - I like getting involved and I'm faster at checking inputs and if the output makes sense if in excel and not on a slide.

Beyond that there's various leadership updates to read through. Reports / data to look at, emails or phone calls that come in from external partners or clients, etc.

Comparatively, I've also had days where I don't leave my desk or pay attention to emails and just read / redline agreements for 4-5 hours.

 

MDs, Directors, and VPs have distinct roles that shape how they spend their time at their computers. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:

Managing Directors (MDs):

  1. Business Development:

    • MDs are primarily responsible for bringing in deals and generating revenue. This involves:
      • Writing and responding to emails with clients and prospects.
      • Preparing for and following up on client meetings.
      • Reviewing pitch materials prepared by the team to ensure alignment with client needs.
  2. Strategic Oversight:

    • They oversee deal execution but delegate most of the day-to-day tasks to VPs and juniors.
    • They might review key documents or provide high-level feedback on deliverables.
  3. Internal Management:

    • MDs often handle internal firm responsibilities, such as:
      • Participating in management meetings.
      • Reviewing team performance and mentoring junior staff.
      • Contributing to firm strategy or group-level initiatives.
  4. Networking and Relationship Management:

    • Even if not traveling, MDs spend time maintaining relationships via calls, emails, or virtual meetings.

Directors:

  1. Transition Role:

    • Directors are in a hybrid position, balancing deal execution and starting to take on more client-facing responsibilities.
    • They may spend time sourcing deals or preparing to take on MD-level responsibilities.
  2. Deal Execution:

    • Directors often act as a bridge between MDs and VPs, ensuring the deal process runs smoothly.
    • They review and refine materials, provide strategic input, and ensure the team is aligned with client expectations.
  3. Internal Coordination:

    • Directors may spend time coordinating with other teams, such as legal, compliance, or other departments, to ensure deals progress without issues.

Vice Presidents (VPs):

  1. Deal Execution:

    • VPs are heavily involved in the execution of deals. This includes:
      • Reviewing and editing Excel models and PowerPoint presentations.
      • Deciding what sensitive documents belong in the dataroom and at what stage.
      • Handling complex analyses, such as NWC (Net Working Capital) or other financial metrics.
  2. Team Management:

    • VPs ensure that analysts and associates are on track with their tasks. They delegate work but also provide clear direction and feedback.
  3. Client Interaction:

    • While not as client-facing as MDs, VPs may handle calls or emails with clients, especially for updates or clarifications.
  4. Process Management:

    • They ensure the deal process is on track, coordinating with both the internal team and external parties like buyers or sellers.

Why Do They Seem "Idle"?

  • MDs and Directors: Their work often involves thinking, strategizing, and communicating, which may not be as visible as building models or creating slides. Even if they’re at their desks, they could be:

    • Drafting emails.
    • Reviewing materials.
    • Strategizing on client pitches or deal approaches.
    • Handling internal firm responsibilities.
  • Directors Not Traveling: If a Director isn’t traveling much, it could be due to the nature of their group or deals. For example, they might be in a support-heavy role or working on deals that don’t require frequent client visits.

In summary, while MDs, Directors, and VPs may not be in Excel or PowerPoint all day, their roles are critical in driving strategy, managing relationships, and ensuring the team delivers high-quality work. Their "invisible" tasks are what keep the wheels turning.

Sources: New VP struggles - asking seasoned VPs for help, New VP struggles - asking seasoned VPs for help, Questions about VP/D/MD levels at investment banks, Life at Mega Developers, The Work Always Gets Done

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

I mean, it's sort of important to note that the "work" that you do all day long, editing models and powerpoints, is pretty useless in the scheme of things.  No one cares.  No one reads the pitch decks.  No one validates the numbers, which are based on a huge series of unknowable assumptions, or bothers to look at the league tables, which are all done with cherrypicked data.

Senior people in most industries are engaged in building, maintaining, and strengthening relationships.  Your long time client doesn't use your group again and again because JP Morgan or Barclays is any better or worse than the other at the super easy job of underwriting and selling a deal, they do it because they have a relationship with your senior banker.

Senior people in any industry are thinking about the issues their clients care about, thinking about how to address those needs pre-emptively, how to be able to answer their questions when the phone rings so they have a response all teed up and ready to go.  Everything, everything, a junior banker does is just window dressing to allow their senior bankers to get to the point.

Even beyond that, think of all the other shit that goes on a large organization.  Your boss has people to whom they report.  They have data to pass up the chain: numbers and analysis surrounding their group's performance, thoughts about hiring/firing, and all the other bureaucratic nonsense that comes with being part of a large organization.

It takes a special degree of self-centeredness to think that the entire organization exists to validate and critique the work that you, and you alone, are doing...

 

Funny rant — tendency is correct but the junior pool is still crucial to eventually bill a deal. What you are describing is the “rainmaking” / origination stage, but execution is also relevant, since there won’t be other deals if the team fkd up.   
Would add to your list: tons of project calls (even if your MD/D seems to skip a lot of stuff, it’s because they work 5-10+ topics plus marketing…), internal discussions on what you’re doing / what you should be doing (weekly updates / pipeline etc.), discussions with product teams on specific items (e.g. sector coverage checking in with DCM/ECM regarding environment / pricing / specifics before suggesting something to a client), partially also recruiting and making sure we have sufficient headcount.   This sort of stuff takes up a lot of my time… the MDs are even more tilted towards the origination part and internal red tape.

 

strghtfrwrd

Funny rant — tendency is correct but the junior pool is still crucial to eventually bill a deal. What you are describing is the “rainmaking” / origination stage, but execution is also relevant, since there won’t be other deals if the team fkd up.   

Yes, the people doing the grunt work are "necessary" but I'll point you to the theme of this website for evidence of how important any given person is.  Monkeys at typewriters.

And execution is fairly irrelevant.  Lets be honest.  Citibank still gets deals despite making 9 figure "oopsies" on a regular basis.  People still borrow from Wells Fargo despite their long and repeating history of fraud against clients.  Goldman has no effective controls around underwriting huge frauds like 1MDB.  All of these institutions still rake in billions and billions of dollars of business and fees.

What was the last investment bank that went under because it "executed" poorly?  Barings?  Even a firm like Bear Stearns or Lehman didn't fail because they failed their clients, they failed because they had abysmal internal controls.  Either clients don't give a shit about performance (or put differently, "performance" is so opaque that no one knows if they're getting good or bad service) or the actual job being done is so obscenely easy that it's effectively failure proof.

 

My friend is a senior MD at a company. He sent a text to all us bros earlier today. Said he closed his door an is not doing anything today except eating his pimento sandwich and watching the masters. He took a picture of said sandwich and TV. LOL

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

Et est placeat et architecto culpa quidem. Illo et sint consequatur error ut fuga eligendi. Aut ut aut quo. Ut sint quibusdam dolor ut.

Ipsum voluptatem magnam omnis est voluptate explicabo. Ipsam quia sit earum reiciendis. Vel et exercitationem ducimus architecto aut voluptatem deserunt.

Alias harum quis repellendus non fugit. Ad nostrum fugit et fugiat velit quam qui architecto. Voluptas neque maiores ea ut. Est sequi reprehenderit dolorem sit. Dolor quis in fugit nulla. Est recusandae natus similique.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”