What happened to WSO

Why is it that when I go to WSO looking for thoughts that are more substantive than minimum effort, sub-single sentence replies, the only quality content I can find is in threads that are at least 10 years old?

For example look at this post from 2007: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/deal-discussion-in-pe-interview

These monkeys are discussing like GENTLEMEN and now WSO is infested with memes, troll posts, tier lists, and college student LARPers. I don't know if this is due to a general social degradation online and the move away from forums to social media but it's so disappointing. We have this community that's so full of incredible professionals in finance careers that could be sharing so much knowledge and it's completely going to waste.

It feels like every time a thread is posted it's a race to who can post the most outrageous joke response and harvest SBs, and then everyone gets distracted and no helpful replies really come in

WSO is cooked?

Yes
85% (85 votes)
No
15% (15 votes)
Total votes: 100
14 Comments
 

It's not WSO. It's the new generation that's on WSO

The Kids That Edtech Writes Off - by Dan Meyer - Mathworlds

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

You can't change how others behave, but you can change how you behave.  Contribute well-thought out and insightful posts and maybe others will return the favor someday

 
Most Helpful

Short answer: barriers to entry were removed and the audience expanded dramatically, which naturally dilutes the quality over time. This is not unique to WSO.

Longer answer: the way we consume and interact with content online has radically changed in the last ~15yrs or so. To access WSO in 2007 was intentional - you were seated at a computer at home, school, or work. Maybe on your laptop at a hip coffee shop called Starbucks if you paid for WiFi. You were deliberately researching finance careers, and probably came across WSO buried a few pages into your search results from Google, or Yahoo if you were a little old fashioned. Somebody doing this would also likely be skewed demographically toward higher levels of income and education. The motivations were also different: this set of people was genuinely trying to learn and exchange ideas; there was less of a race to see who could post the snarkiest comment, or repost some early meme for the honor of silver bananas. There was far less attention seeking behavior compared to today.

Fast forward a decade or so, and now everyone has a smartphone and high-speed internet access. Remember how WSO was originally accessed a decade prior, sitting on a computer in your room? It was a deliberate activity that you participated in and then finished, not something tethered to your brain 24/7. In fact, people who spent *too much time* online were considered to be fucking losers. You’d be told to get a life, called a basement dweller, etc. Precursors to the present-day “touch grass,” if you will. Internet addicts were out-of-touch, socially maladjusted weirdos. Think Comic Book Guy from The Simpsons (at best).

Presently, the problem is that now there are tens of millions of internet weirdos in the U.S. alone. It’s mainstream, or at least not shameful, to be a total fucking dork anymore. In fact, in many cases it’s incentivized and rewarded: whether it’s the dopamine hit from getting an upvote on a dumb post, or the kids literally taking in millions as “influencers” or “content creators.” You now get to see and read thoughts from every village idiot, every weirdo, from all over the world, AND NOW, all of the LLM-generated content that has trained on them. They probably found WSO randomly from a reddit post or something.

Happy Monday, y’all.

 

Fugiat cumque eius accusantium atque necessitatibus fuga. Nulla sed fuga minima cum omnis nihil nihil. Odio nemo ad eveniet quia sit molestiae. Autem ad et ducimus et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”