Why would M&A activity be the driving catalyst behind whether or not a business has future growth/profitability prospects?
"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill |
"It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
M&A doesn’t create growth, but it’s often a signal of where capital believes there is growth. If no one’s buying, even with record valuations, that’s a red flag. It can suggest buyers don’t buy the story or can’t justify the risk. In contrast, active M&A is often a vote of confidence in future cash flows.
The valuations themselves are also a signal of where capital believes there is growth. Multiples will expand if future growth prospects increase and capital piles into an asset class/sector following that belief. I would argue that M&A activity is less of a standalone growth indicator (particularly when you separate the different reasons for M&A at the strategic level) and more of a symptom of change in regulatory appetite. For example, under the previous admin the lack of M&A wasn't because there wasn't growth in the affected sectors, but because regulators were taking the scalps of any attempted large M&A deals e.g. Adobe/Figma.
"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill |
"It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
Perferendis non quis ad voluptatibus sint vitae. Asperiores deserunt sit totam et non tempore. Dolorum culpa quos officiis blanditiis tenetur sunt perspiciatis. Sit illo autem et aperiam.
Perspiciatis et tenetur ipsum odit et voluptatem ut. Modi dignissimos laudantium illo rerum dolor sed eum. Est facere perspiciatis nisi deleniti omnis et. Ab voluptas est labore fuga temporibus ex quia. Excepturi quasi tempore vero aut est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Why would M&A activity be the driving catalyst behind whether or not a business has future growth/profitability prospects?
M&A doesn’t create growth, but it’s often a signal of where capital believes there is growth. If no one’s buying, even with record valuations, that’s a red flag. It can suggest buyers don’t buy the story or can’t justify the risk. In contrast, active M&A is often a vote of confidence in future cash flows.
The valuations themselves are also a signal of where capital believes there is growth. Multiples will expand if future growth prospects increase and capital piles into an asset class/sector following that belief. I would argue that M&A activity is less of a standalone growth indicator (particularly when you separate the different reasons for M&A at the strategic level) and more of a symptom of change in regulatory appetite. For example, under the previous admin the lack of M&A wasn't because there wasn't growth in the affected sectors, but because regulators were taking the scalps of any attempted large M&A deals e.g. Adobe/Figma.
Is this true across industries?
I’ve heard healthcare and pharm valuations are not too hot rn, but judging by your name you already know this.
Lots of action in FIG m&a atm.
With the exception of a few industries, the broader question still stands.
Perferendis non quis ad voluptatibus sint vitae. Asperiores deserunt sit totam et non tempore. Dolorum culpa quos officiis blanditiis tenetur sunt perspiciatis. Sit illo autem et aperiam.
Perspiciatis et tenetur ipsum odit et voluptatem ut. Modi dignissimos laudantium illo rerum dolor sed eum. Est facere perspiciatis nisi deleniti omnis et. Ab voluptas est labore fuga temporibus ex quia. Excepturi quasi tempore vero aut est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...