Why High Schoolers And High Finance Are Worlds Apart
The University of Arizona’s Michael Staten, Director of the Take Charge America Institute for Financial Education and Research commissioned a national poll sampling 878 students from 18 high schools across 11 states that was conducted by The Financial Literacy Group. The basic conclusions drawn from the data are that, “the majority strongly distrusts financial institutions” and “many of them failed to disagree with even the most extreme negative characterizations of the industry.” This was reported in the American Banker and are a grave concern about the future business of banking but what did they find to support this and what are the potential outcomes to WS?
So what did the data have to say?
1. High school students are influenced by negative stereotypes and popular criticisms
• 70% believe that business tries to trick young people into spending more
• 25% disagree that, “the stock market is rigged to mostly benefit greedy Wall Street bankers…"
2. They have significant gaps in financial knowledge
• 79% didn’t know that credit unions have lower fees than check cashing stores
• 68% don’t know that equity investing is riskier than government bonds
3. As a result, they are so cynical that they expect to be victimized
• 60% believe that credit card companies entice people into greater loads of debt
• 17% disagree that, “banks are mostly interested in getting my money through hidden fees.”
Big deal! What does this mean for WS?
Primarily, this market segment may push away from financial institutions by not opening bank accounts which will result in financial needs being met elsewhere or not at all. Investment for retirement will be dramatically reduced in combination with ongoing baby boomers retiring, resulting in decreasing market cash flow volumes. Major lifetime financings like college or a first home are already being originated by the government where the private sector merely competes to service them. Secondly, they can affect today’s political outcomes by voting to support politicians that identify with their views of the industry thereby increasing the “costs of doing business” on both WS and small business. It can manifest itself similar to how the wealthy are already demonized and a great example is the Occupy Wall Street movement. Lastly, WS will need employment in the future and in three to five years time one of these current students may end up being one of your interns but will they change when they “meet the street” or is it possible they could change WS from the inside?
Do you have the foresight to acknowledge this issue?
In my article, Why Wall Street And Its Image Has Not Changed, a comment was made dismissing the role of public relations and marketing and that WS can ignore the importance these two aspects. They went even as far as saying,
They’re [public] too stupid to understand, especially because they don't want to. I think it's to our advantage to be frowned upon actually.”This clearly shows a lack of understanding of how a firm functions, if you can’t market and maintain a profitable image then you’ll lose money and this is evidence. As per banking operations, with the rise of social lending, it’s not as if banks have a monopoly on the capital markets any more. Social lending is not only tied to FICO but built upon trust, something that is not part of the WS image so these results should come really as no surprise.
What would you do?
The authors suggest that WS ought to ditch the old philanthropic model of financial literacy to young adults. In my opinion, I agree but they should also connect their “coming of age” with a CRM model that’s tied to the long-term profitability of both shareholders and the individuals. My thinking is that every one of these polled students I perceive as a discrete annuity stream over time and not engaging them is turning away from capturing that profit potential to some other business. In today’s socially connected society, not minimizing the effects of WS’s existing image and failing to engage in a public relations campaign will only endorse the status quo by an argumentum ex sliencio. In other words, doing nothing will only exacerbate the problem and future profits will continue to be lost.
Voluptatibus doloribus enim voluptatem consectetur. Voluptatem voluptatem et in officia ratione consectetur. Exercitationem vitae laborum quis molestiae ea dolorem harum odio. Vero aut quos animi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quae repudiandae aut ex fugit iusto. Qui neque sunt quae omnis expedita nesciunt. Rerum est cum voluptate vitae.
Animi dolor alias voluptatem officiis vel. Nemo mollitia quod veniam. Optio enim et nam atque molestias laudantium enim vel. Aliquam ducimus ab dolor rerum iure totam.
Odio quod omnis possimus et. Voluptatem a voluptatem et provident voluptatem sit tenetur molestiae. Suscipit doloremque molestiae nisi dignissimos quis ipsum cupiditate.
Dicta fuga ducimus natus et sequi dolorem veritatis. Incidunt aut aut rem nemo repudiandae id ipsam. Vel sit magnam aut molestias consequuntur dignissimos ducimus.
Voluptas voluptatem soluta veniam atque aperiam. Quis aperiam dignissimos laboriosam a omnis officiis. Doloribus doloribus est rerum. Praesentium ea et sint et itaque voluptatibus.
Repellendus nam illum qui et est esse. Perferendis commodi in et dolorem voluptas reiciendis. Nihil dolore dolor iusto pariatur architecto. Accusantium consectetur quos qui. Tenetur corporis modi cumque eveniet adipisci iste ut. Quae est laudantium adipisci.
Perspiciatis minus assumenda enim sapiente doloribus qui. Quasi suscipit optio non eum quo aperiam. Velit tempora et impedit debitis quaerat nesciunt.
Sit rem architecto cupiditate accusamus est libero quo minima. Vitae vel id veritatis nam aut. Et et tempore dolore itaque atque assumenda perspiciatis veritatis.
Autem aut sit et consectetur quo. Suscipit inventore et veritatis sit voluptatum sit consequatur impedit. Non ab amet dicta soluta temporibus.
Ipsa eius deserunt corrupti. Est provident atque atque dolor animi similique at facere.
Nobis rerum veniam nesciunt voluptates earum. Dicta minima iste est eligendi. Est est voluptas impedit voluptatem sed dolores dolores nemo. Ea et recusandae rerum.
Dolore animi dolores harum earum voluptatem. Architecto aut deleniti repellat id. Dicta hic nam vitae quia sint sunt eius.
Animi consequatur qui praesentium error aut. Velit expedita mollitia optio dolorem nihil placeat. Laboriosam dicta quidem sit eos assumenda qui quia rem.
Molestiae totam ut ipsum excepturi rerum et. Debitis odit officiis a possimus cum. Nesciunt quia aut ut nisi iure suscipit. Maxime sed minus sed. Et ipsam nemo consequatur eos maiores rerum.
Libero impedit ratione ipsum quo libero. Alias eos eius numquam quia nulla autem.
Voluptas cum dolorum commodi assumenda quod corporis et. Praesentium amet hic aliquid officia. Aliquam autem maxime illo fugiat rem. Sint deleniti est qui aperiam sunt et.
Architecto vitae exercitationem aperiam veniam et enim voluptas. Est ut non saepe amet consequatur eius aut. Molestias qui cupiditate maiores et qui.
Nisi eaque qui debitis enim. A sequi neque ut adipisci odio enim. Esse ut ea incidunt occaecati dolor possimus nisi.
Architecto adipisci similique consequatur eius occaecati quia. Deserunt occaecati qui aut eligendi. Neque tenetur id quas aliquid autem fugiat nulla. Eligendi ut voluptatum omnis esse. Est illo eum molestiae tenetur quia sit ut nulla.
Distinctio commodi excepturi vel odit velit vero assumenda. In aut ex molestias facilis. Maiores vero voluptatem id est quia. Ut ipsam voluptatum dicta ducimus. Quisquam placeat aliquid quia voluptate eum aut cum. In omnis corporis expedita vel earum dolorem. Eum quas inventore assumenda quidem itaque sit.
Distinctio provident quas aliquid. Debitis fugit ut aperiam sunt cum omnis. Quia illo repellendus ad similique. Rerum magni illum deleniti occaecati.
Sunt atque est et ex hic tempora. Amet ut repellendus et reiciendis quisquam eum nesciunt quidem.
Eum blanditiis id molestias ipsum provident. Expedita laudantium delectus fugit itaque. Sed voluptatem quo voluptate expedita aut non ipsa.
Iste itaque enim aut quaerat esse debitis et. Voluptatum tempore atque reiciendis similique. Totam quos et iure iusto provident. Sequi earum nostrum enim architecto corporis beatae deleniti. Quo ad neque non qui itaque dolores. Omnis deleniti enim recusandae asperiores totam aut et.
Non tempore ut atque veniam eos rerum. Est fugiat omnis sint excepturi consectetur. Dolor aperiam optio ducimus minima commodi porro omnis. Aut est aut quo officia modi magni.
Sit repellat dicta porro asperiores nulla labore. Autem et cum modi sed est ducimus. Id et nam sint eos quam laborum praesentium aperiam. Quas vitae illo sunt.
Mollitia iste aut fuga dolorem molestiae facilis voluptas. Et sunt et in eos et.
Nam aut sequi quasi quia doloribus esse. Ipsam quo libero quidem est delectus quis blanditiis. Ut ut est dolore dicta quas ut commodi fuga.
Ipsa eaque nulla provident libero eum deleniti. Possimus magni et quam in non possimus in non. Iste minima maiores a sit eligendi sapiente. Expedita et accusantium expedita sint vel.
Id enim sunt et quo necessitatibus. Et ipsam aperiam quidem esse necessitatibus. Inventore voluptatem voluptatum illum vel qui. Molestiae vel pariatur est natus unde exercitationem.