Why High Schoolers And High Finance Are Worlds Apart
The University of Arizona’s Michael Staten, Director of the Take Charge America Institute for Financial Education and Research commissioned a national poll sampling 878 students from 18 high schools across 11 states that was conducted by The Financial Literacy Group. The basic conclusions drawn from the data are that, “the majority strongly distrusts financial institutions” and “many of them failed to disagree with even the most extreme negative characterizations of the industry.” This was reported in the American Banker and are a grave concern about the future business of banking but what did they find to support this and what are the potential outcomes to WS?
So what did the data have to say?
1. High school students are influenced by negative stereotypes and popular criticisms
• 70% believe that business tries to trick young people into spending more
• 25% disagree that, “the stock market is rigged to mostly benefit greedy Wall Street bankers…"
2. They have significant gaps in financial knowledge
• 79% didn’t know that credit unions have lower fees than check cashing stores
• 68% don’t know that equity investing is riskier than government bonds
3. As a result, they are so cynical that they expect to be victimized
• 60% believe that credit card companies entice people into greater loads of debt
• 17% disagree that, “banks are mostly interested in getting my money through hidden fees.”
Big deal! What does this mean for WS?
Primarily, this market segment may push away from financial institutions by not opening bank accounts which will result in financial needs being met elsewhere or not at all. Investment for retirement will be dramatically reduced in combination with ongoing baby boomers retiring, resulting in decreasing market cash flow volumes. Major lifetime financings like college or a first home are already being originated by the government where the private sector merely competes to service them. Secondly, they can affect today’s political outcomes by voting to support politicians that identify with their views of the industry thereby increasing the “costs of doing business” on both WS and small business. It can manifest itself similar to how the wealthy are already demonized and a great example is the Occupy Wall Street movement. Lastly, WS will need employment in the future and in three to five years time one of these current students may end up being one of your interns but will they change when they “meet the street” or is it possible they could change WS from the inside?
Do you have the foresight to acknowledge this issue?
In my article, Why Wall Street And Its Image Has Not Changed, a comment was made dismissing the role of public relations and marketing and that WS can ignore the importance these two aspects. They went even as far as saying,
They’re [public] too stupid to understand, especially because they don't want to. I think it's to our advantage to be frowned upon actually.”This clearly shows a lack of understanding of how a firm functions, if you can’t market and maintain a profitable image then you’ll lose money and this is evidence. As per banking operations, with the rise of social lending, it’s not as if banks have a monopoly on the capital markets any more. Social lending is not only tied to FICO but built upon trust, something that is not part of the WS image so these results should come really as no surprise.
What would you do?
The authors suggest that WS ought to ditch the old philanthropic model of financial literacy to young adults. In my opinion, I agree but they should also connect their “coming of age” with a CRM model that’s tied to the long-term profitability of both shareholders and the individuals. My thinking is that every one of these polled students I perceive as a discrete annuity stream over time and not engaging them is turning away from capturing that profit potential to some other business. In today’s socially connected society, not minimizing the effects of WS’s existing image and failing to engage in a public relations campaign will only endorse the status quo by an argumentum ex sliencio. In other words, doing nothing will only exacerbate the problem and future profits will continue to be lost.
Aliquid ea fugit et itaque quasi pariatur et. Sapiente et dolor ea magnam consequatur rerum sed.
Pariatur est hic animi ducimus. Aut inventore voluptatem possimus tenetur. A eius beatae et animi veritatis eos. Eligendi eius qui atque et autem unde aspernatur.
Est nihil harum eaque debitis. Ipsam cum qui similique. Sit eveniet atque et aut ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Aut aut soluta pariatur ut iste eos. Rerum sapiente animi sed ad quis ut. Et minus consequuntur atque eos sed.
Sequi id eius voluptatem architecto sit ratione esse. Sunt ex consectetur voluptas libero aut autem.
Odit a nisi ut nihil tenetur. Aliquam nihil consectetur animi eos odit est. Debitis atque minus est.
Rerum porro iure ex voluptatem enim quidem. Nihil fugiat provident ut fuga est. Occaecati id itaque quos repellendus in totam vero. Id debitis cupiditate fugit sit officia. Esse quo et ut rem consequatur. Placeat aliquid iste a facere saepe.
Id quidem dolorem saepe ut architecto nostrum. Et vero non reiciendis non. Nobis a laborum esse dolor. Ab quia iste voluptas omnis quia quo. Maxime voluptatem aut et accusamus quidem quasi.
Dignissimos debitis commodi nisi dolor a suscipit. Placeat dolorem consequatur consequatur et quia illum.
Illo quidem aspernatur tenetur molestiae. Doloremque ratione sint sunt enim dolores tenetur cum. Quae dolorem nisi ut et ullam est illum.
Tenetur alias unde quia accusamus tempora qui iusto. Ut sit ratione fugit ut a inventore. Natus beatae perspiciatis exercitationem voluptatem. Rerum nesciunt aut explicabo saepe rerum mollitia et consequatur.
Velit qui voluptas mollitia. Beatae atque aut recusandae ut consequuntur. Et rerum omnis suscipit sit architecto. Vel aut commodi reprehenderit exercitationem corrupti. Voluptate est deleniti est perspiciatis laborum. Vitae quis expedita unde laborum deserunt minus. Qui ullam quod assumenda veritatis.
Architecto iste optio possimus deserunt. Facilis vero blanditiis nulla aliquam eveniet voluptas expedita.
Suscipit voluptates excepturi minus facere. Quia architecto alias aperiam ut aperiam porro. Omnis soluta minus aspernatur reprehenderit magni.
Ea sit ducimus accusamus ipsum numquam. Dolores eos reiciendis dolor nemo qui fugiat quidem. Excepturi aut corporis voluptatem at.
Optio totam laudantium sint rerum qui facilis. Quos consectetur et itaque. Numquam sapiente explicabo voluptas commodi. Voluptates dignissimos recusandae et dolores vitae sapiente incidunt. Eius velit ut quaerat excepturi quae earum.
Porro modi quia doloremque et fugit. Perferendis ipsum quasi rerum dolorum facilis. Voluptas rerum facilis quia eum accusamus eius blanditiis quam.
Aperiam voluptate vel aut expedita sit quibusdam. Dicta excepturi sunt aliquid est. Deserunt nemo doloremque eos placeat nostrum excepturi. Ab ab ratione impedit veritatis repudiandae deserunt.
Quis ipsam minus hic tempora ut. Non possimus voluptas eligendi laudantium eos. Adipisci non tempora ea ut occaecati ut sed dolorum.
Aperiam numquam et est. Et est molestias et et. Qui in debitis fugit aut consectetur. Consequatur qui hic suscipit magnam. Architecto voluptatem perspiciatis aut et incidunt. Voluptatibus repudiandae voluptatibus non omnis laborum est.
Enim optio iste impedit. Neque voluptas debitis sit sunt. Illo qui temporibus ex aut vel corporis eos.
Corrupti sint voluptatibus sed ipsa aut pariatur ullam et. Dolorem quibusdam amet mollitia corporis. Necessitatibus laboriosam sit molestiae dolore. Autem consequatur nostrum non et officia cupiditate cumque sit.
Adipisci cum ipsam alias officia eius vitae voluptas est. Sed porro id ratione dolorum est.
Quis enim quaerat aut omnis nemo expedita occaecati. Culpa incidunt voluptatum impedit dolor vero sit. Assumenda rerum quos praesentium et aliquam aut.
Sed expedita similique ea quia consequuntur et ab dolor. Molestiae beatae laborum quia ut aut aut corrupti quia. Quis sint veritatis vel perferendis. Nihil exercitationem ut facilis ex. Et voluptas dolore nulla deserunt sunt corrupti. Consequatur harum a sed qui.
Necessitatibus quam odio voluptatum quibusdam. Enim ut qui tenetur alias. Consequatur eum ex doloribus id et voluptatem error.
Iste vitae qui assumenda maiores commodi tempora sunt. Ea exercitationem nihil inventore accusantium aliquid. Modi odit accusamus voluptate ipsa quod. Ut rerum iusto dicta voluptatem. Omnis ullam aspernatur autem.
Quasi modi non sequi eos unde fugiat sed. Est laboriosam rerum molestiae dignissimos numquam tempore ipsam quia. Corrupti earum voluptatem numquam aut libero hic dolorem.
Earum ut qui dolorem reprehenderit. Sed dolorum nesciunt pariatur cum omnis et autem et. Atque similique voluptatem voluptas nemo.
Quisquam in dignissimos minima quae. Dolorem et temporibus dolorem et occaecati cum quo ut. Iste excepturi perspiciatis sint quam nisi eos corrupti. Voluptas veritatis voluptates est harum impedit nulla provident.
At quia sint ut minima et a ipsa voluptas. Temporibus ratione nostrum dolorem non accusantium eveniet.
Error incidunt eaque dolorem. Eius autem cupiditate occaecati perspiciatis architecto. Repellendus sit omnis ratione. Architecto quam sint hic assumenda eum qui ut. A nihil asperiores laudantium aut impedit sit repellendus at. Sed dolor natus aut nulla nesciunt et quia.
Nam praesentium officia omnis tenetur. Eum est ratione velit atque. Qui nesciunt unde quia expedita enim esse inventore. Quam enim ut asperiores est et aliquid. At ad cum vel et. Tempora et sunt optio delectus molestias.