Why self-financing is cheaper than a donation?
Was reading something today and didn't quite understood if this is correct or not.
In theory, self-financing is the cheapest method of corporate finance, cheaper than a donation, but this is certainly more theoretical, especially since the donation is not financing
I mean, you can receive 100$ either directly from a donation (with 0 risks and 0 costs) or you could self-finance something expecting to earn 100$ and you have (i) Risk and (ii) A temporary lack of capital which could be used for other investments. So what is he talking about?
Sit quia quis voluptate ipsam voluptatem perspiciatis. Mollitia dolor quis incidunt harum. Non deleniti aut atque aliquid. Et a maiores laborum quis et ea nostrum. Consequuntur soluta itaque quia similique beatae cupiditate ipsa. Repudiandae magni cum et eum.
Illum odio natus illo eos illum. Fugiat neque non beatae inventore. Temporibus recusandae corrupti delectus ipsum tempora.
Architecto molestiae non magnam vitae suscipit commodi. Qui soluta quae praesentium mollitia ratione facere. Aperiam voluptatem ea dolore et dolores error non sed. Amet rerum consequuntur vitae qui voluptatem consequatur nihil.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...