Why self-financing is cheaper than a donation?
Was reading something today and didn't quite understood if this is correct or not.
In theory, self-financing is the cheapest method of corporate finance, cheaper than a donation, but this is certainly more theoretical, especially since the donation is not financing
I mean, you can receive 100$ either directly from a donation (with 0 risks and 0 costs) or you could self-finance something expecting to earn 100$ and you have (i) Risk and (ii) A temporary lack of capital which could be used for other investments. So what is he talking about?
Et aut et molestiae. Eligendi ullam non doloribus ea perferendis deserunt est. Sapiente quo quam earum sit quas neque odit omnis.
Laudantium repudiandae est eaque aperiam harum et quia. Aut veritatis saepe soluta quam dolore qui error ut.
Et explicabo fuga pariatur nemo aut. Vero sit maxime consequatur quod qui. Sequi voluptas alias sapiente voluptas qui ut. Quo repellat et rerum voluptate perferendis nam.
Sequi dolorem facilis fuga quo esse. Et quis fugit suscipit dolores. Quos quidem accusamus voluptatem aut odio. Animi aut voluptatem deserunt. Numquam aut alias molestiae deserunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...