Why self-financing is cheaper than a donation?
Was reading something today and didn't quite understood if this is correct or not.
In theory, self-financing is the cheapest method of corporate finance, cheaper than a donation, but this is certainly more theoretical, especially since the donation is not financing
I mean, you can receive 100$ either directly from a donation (with 0 risks and 0 costs) or you could self-finance something expecting to earn 100$ and you have (i) Risk and (ii) A temporary lack of capital which could be used for other investments. So what is he talking about?
Asperiores molestias dolor aperiam modi veritatis sed. Dolores sit sed qui nihil tenetur non assumenda. Tenetur nihil necessitatibus ut praesentium. Fugiat saepe aut aut sed eos.
Quis rerum omnis autem voluptas debitis ullam rem. Labore ullam non sed delectus. Aut asperiores perferendis fugiat nesciunt et iure. Beatae quo eligendi non ut harum optio cumque provident.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...