AI Software for PE professionals
Beyond the large LLMs like ChatGPT, are anyone using any vertical AI-enabled software for routine workflows (that actually work…)? I’m thinking for sourcing, executing DD, memo writing, or portfolio / ops (like monitoring, reporting, valuations)?
Lot of hype around AI but is it just me feeling like it hasn’t significantly improved my day to day workflows?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, AI-enabled software is indeed making strides in private equity (PE), but its adoption and effectiveness vary depending on the specific use case. Here’s a breakdown of how AI is being utilized in PE workflows:
1. Sourcing Deals
2. Due Diligence (DD)
3. Memo Writing
4. Portfolio Monitoring and Reporting
5. Valuations
Challenges and Limitations:
Final Thoughts:
While AI has the potential to revolutionize workflows in PE, many professionals share your sentiment that the day-to-day impact has been incremental rather than transformative. The key is to identify tools that address specific pain points in your workflow and integrate them effectively into your processes. If you're looking for actionable recommendations, exploring platforms like Arctic AI or engaging with WSO's resources on AI in finance could be a good starting point.
Sources: Q&A: AI will automate many roles in the IB/PE world. A live Q&A with Arctic, who are recruiting finance professionals to help manage that change, Q&A: AI will automate many roles in the IB/PE world. A live Q&A with Arctic, who are recruiting finance professionals to help manage that change
NotebookLM
Brightwave is good
I use tons of AI personally. The highest leverage use case for me is doing research around ideas I have. For example, we do distressed deals and I have been investigating how the legal system works in a country we have never done a deal in works. Once I have some rough ideas, I can have them professionally validated.
But this also applies to other ideas I have specific to our portfolio companies. It's weirdly good at guessing costs... I have been kind of shocked. But I've been using this to figure out impact/effort of certain initiatives WITHOUT having to bug the portfolio company's team. This is nice so I can come to them with something that is ~80% fleshed out and just needs some validation VS asking a bunch of Qs.
I'm a VC who looks at private capital software...TBH, haven't seen any that's really taken hold at any PE shop.
I use it to make naked pictures of women, which I then imbed into the disclosure section of my memos as faint watermarks that are only barely visible when printed. It keeps compliance on their toes and makes reviewing the disclosures much more enjoyable.
I use AlphaSense generative search as an easy place to get answers on why certain public names traded up / down over a given period, track more niche metrics mentioned during earnings but not reported in 10-Qs, pull quick sound bites from broker research. If you’re in a seat where you’re doing a lot of customer calls, would recommend investing in transcription software from the expert networks or OtterAI, Plaud, or Junior AI.
Your instinct is right, and I think the reason is that most of the vertical PE tools are trying to automate the wrong layer. They're building pretty front ends on top of general-purpose models and calling it "AI for PE" when the underlying problem is way more boring than that. The firms I've seen get actual value aren't buying off-the-shelf deal screening tools. They're doing what m_1 described, using AI as a thinking partner for research and pre-work, then validating with humans. That use case works because the input is your own brain (context, hypotheses, questions) not some messy shared drive full of CIMs in twelve different formats.
Where vertical tools consistently fall short is anything that requires pulling from a firm's own historical data. Your past deals, your IC memos, your portfolio company reporting. That data is almost never in a state where any tool can do something useful with it out of the box. Different formats, inconsistent tagging, half of it living in someone's email. So you buy the tool, plug it in, and get mediocre outputs because the foundation isn't there.
the firms who'll get the most from AI in 18 months are the ones spending time now just getting their data house in order. Standardizing how portfolio companies report, structuring historical deal files, building a consistent taxonomy. None of that requires fancy software.
Transacted has been good for us. Takes a long time to process a new deal though which can get annoying.
Amet dolorem mollitia officia ad harum. Blanditiis enim quo explicabo quod ex omnis a. Quam dolor sit soluta ad sequi. Hic rerum vel nemo laborum quaerat hic illum. Voluptates error quo omnis dolores beatae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...