16 Comments
 
Controversial

Lot of Princeton guys, they did an info session there and was super uninspiring if u ask me. Mid market PE in pretty weird industries, seemed like pretty good WLB and had a diversity of majors and stuff but just didn’t seem like they were on an exceptional trajectory as a firm. Would not want to start my career there….

 
Most Helpful

I work for an LP that did DD work on them last year. They focus only on software and business services companies and have a funky strategy - basically, they create something called 'aggregators' that are thematic. These aggregators are a little bit like conglomerates, they have a few sub-platforms e.g. child care, government transportation, insurance, logistics, etc. where they will acquire very small companies (like sub 1m EBITDA) focused on these sub-platform into the aggregator. The aggregator has their own finance, HR, M&A teams and so these aggregators run like their own mini conglomerate with pretty independent decision making ability to acquire targets. So you can think of it like a massive platform at the aggregator level with dozens of add-on acquisitions, like buy and build on steroids. For exits, they'll exit sub-platform by sub-platform and they might choose to retain the aggregator (with maybe 1 vertical left) and roll it into a continuation fund. 

The idea is to leverage their firm resources to squeeze value out of subscale companies and have them benefit from professionalisation from the Alpine platform and also inserting their own executives at both sub-platform and small add-on company level. They have this executives programme for fresh MBA grads and they'll parachute these guys into their portcos. 

m8 is right - their returns have been spectacular from Fund IV onwards, with returns in the 4-5x net TVPI range with good DPIs too. They've scaled extremely fast too, from a 250m Fund IV in 2011 to a 3.5b fund for Fund IX.

Not sure about exact comp numbers, but all team members get a cut of carried interest after their first year at Alpine, though allocations are likely small since Graham Weaver still holds a large percentage of carry and their portfolio team is stupidly large (like 50+). 

IMO it's a unique strategy and would likely be good exposure esp. at portco ops level, but really unsure if their strategy can still work at larger and larger fund sizes. The number of add-ons they do is mind-blowing, and it suggests that it will eventually blow up in their faces. Though not sure when it will happen (if ever).

 

Hey thanks for this, this probably the best explanation I have seen. Based on your experience I was also curious if you had any perspective on one rock capital? I know they are raising a 3.25 bill fund. Isn’t that unusual given that it took alpine almsot a decade+ and multiple funds to get that?

 

I haven't heard of One Rock, but from what I see they've roughly doubled their fund size every three years which is pretty common for good-performing funds. So yeah, not that unusual.

Lots of GPs have the incentive, especially if their first fund does well, to raise a large amount of money ASAP to earn management fees. If One Rock does raise USD3.25b that's USD65m per annum for the next ten years on one fund alone assuming 2% management fee on committed, that's a hell lot of money

 

Dicta enim dolores qui. Voluptatibus laborum ratione aut necessitatibus.

Aspernatur enim sunt ut quis. Nostrum consequatur et exercitationem voluptas sunt dolorem assumenda ea. Officia eaque soluta voluptatibus ut possimus repudiandae optio. Eos non et aut vero corporis. Eos ab dicta ut. Quidem ullam nisi veniam voluptates distinctio.

Non corporis illo delectus non iusto error. Neque sapiente aut nulla ex mollitia in. Deleniti non officiis illo sit excepturi quisquam. Hic tempore nihil dolorum. Vel sint quasi aut ducimus libero quo ut.

Tempore qui sit eos commodi consequatur voluptatibus facilis. Minus voluptatum sunt et eligendi atque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”