Am I fucked for on-cycle as a non-target?

About to start as a first year in a top group (EVR M&A, GS TMT, MS M&A) and was planning to do on cycle recruiting. 
 

Didn’t realize until recently that school pedigree still mattered once you’re already in banking. I was hoping to do MF/UMM PE but go to a non-target LAC (tier below Amherst/Williams) and am not diversity. Have a 3.95, 1570 SAT, and solid buy-side internships. 
 

Will I have a problem getting interviews at MFs and UMMs

6 Comments
 
Most Helpful

u cant change school now so just focus on what u can control bro. Ur wasting time and energy on the wrong things

 

Different firms care about slightly different things. However, I will say - for the most part - one’s banking group (as it’s more recent and real work experience) trumps one’s undergrad, especially if you’ve had good performance at both. I’d focus on getting good work experience/upskilling and interviewing well because once you get looks (which you will) that will separate you.

For context, this is coming from someone that didn’t come from a marquee group (and got passed on a bunch because of this) and is going UMM.

 

Generally yes - but moot point for on cycle considering the differentiating factor is brand name, both firm and undergrad wise.

Will OP likely find it harder than target + top group kids to do MF? Probably. But he’ll still get looks and have it easier than the many candidates not in top groups.

 

Sounds like on cycle this year took place before anyone had real experience? 

 

Temporibus ducimus quia quas ullam aut aut. Rerum quasi similique ab quas sit.

Voluptate ad dicta in nisi aut quia. Est aut aut aut ipsam. Et sint porro architecto quidem. Autem fugit velit dolorem alias. Et doloremque voluptatem saepe maiores.

Est expedita qui distinctio at provident officiis et. Eum similique doloremque consequatur quis explicabo enim. Enim laudantium consequatur doloribus aspernatur vitae.

Aut ratione delectus consequuntur atque. Quaerat optio debitis veniam sapiente. Vel cumque quo quia occaecati omnis sequi. Non consequuntur culpa ipsam et assumenda repellendus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”