So I just got hit with a new concept in my annual review. The firm I work at has had significant associate churn in the past year, and I guess they decided to implement bonus clawbacks. The rough mechanics are: When i signed my offer letter last year, they gave me a bonus range of $x to $y. Then in the review, they said, here's your "base bonus" ($x) and "premium bonus" ($y - $x). Accompanying this discussion was a letter acknowledging that if I left in the next 12 months, I had to pay back an amount up to the premium bonus if the fund requested it.
This seems significantly off-market for PE associate comp, no? I understand it at more senior levels (talent retention), etc. but 1) I've never heard of it for associates and 2) almost creates perverse incentives to leave the firm sooner (when bonuses are smaller in early years of career) to minimize the financial cost of leaving.
Any thoughts / advice / is this normal?
Everything happens for a reason. Why are they having problems retaining talent? Is it because of fund performance? Culture? I have not worked at many funds and I have never heard of claw back on cash bonus at the associate level. Is this 2 and out type of firm or partner track? Either way seems to be a shitty way to retain talent via golden handcuffs, if you can even call it that.
That is definitely not market for cash comp. I sincerely hope this is not indicative of a broader trend.
Sounds to me like pretty soon they're going to solve their talent retention issues by attracting worse talent.
never heard of this...pretty brutal.
There's something pretty toxic about a firm trying to solve a broader issue by targeting the comp of those lowest on the rung. This is definitely my first time hearing about this in PE.
definitely off market. You should start looking for another job. This is not the type of behavior that a good PE firm exhibit. Tells you a lot about the founders mentality towards employees.
Yeah. If they are doing clawbacks at the associate level, there is something fucked up going on there. This is red flags out the wazoo.
The fact that they said they can claw back up to the value of the "premier" bonus should stand out and provide ample cause for concern. Say the range is 50K base to 100K premier, if you left, they may hold you to a clawback of 100K. Based on the way you wrote your post, that is disconcerting. Plus, there is no indication of pro-rata clawbacks and there is a huge tax implication with this.
Vero libero consequatur quibusdam quo ab aspernatur. Est similique iste pariatur amet voluptates perferendis. Animi error consectetur qui enim ut consectetur deleniti voluptatum. Possimus expedita quia in. Sint fugit accusamus dolore sit ullam. Sit odit veniam dolorem labore voluptas. Est recusandae ex et dolorum voluptatem totam.
Assumenda velit autem molestiae aut consequuntur est. Qui quaerat magnam voluptas illum dolorem ea debitis nihil. Aperiam odit excepturi fugiat.
Deleniti nobis rerum repellendus ab dicta at ullam. Aut dolor consequatur est assumenda veniam sit sequi. Accusamus odit dolore voluptatem unde excepturi accusantium corporis.
Natus facere vel consequatur assumenda animi excepturi veniam. Illum facere quia aliquid adipisci beatae odio molestiae. Autem cumque eius illo quia quam doloremque sint. Blanditiis amet natus ut quo dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...