127 Comments
 

This might be a dumb question but how "competitive" is this program? From reading the other forums on here it appears the consensus is that bain has shifted out of the MF category for pe so im curious how that might have impacted this process? Are top candidates taking this over the top banking gigs? Obviously this is a good program but for the top candidates it comes down to splitting hairs so I wonder how the UMM categorization impacts the thought process

 

For the type A people it probably is pretty substantial and they likely will only target the MF PE analyst programs or do 2 years at banking for a shot to get into MF but for 99% of the other monkeys they would be more than happy taking this opportunity. Bain has struggled recently but is still a reputable name, will be interesting to see if this decade fairs better for them

 

Is that really true in the broader PE community? Bain has ~$20B in PE AUM globally and (correct me if I’m wrong) recent performance has been very good from what I’ve seen.

Obviously Bain and TPG stumbled in 2008, but it looks like they’ve both gotten back on track since then. And many private firms (i.e. not Carlyle, BX, APO, KKR) have chosen to limit their AUM to maintain performance since the incentives end up quite different. So I struggle to see why Bain would be looked at negatively right now. If anything the picture seems very encouraging?

 

20bn aum across all funds/strategies/geographies isnt that big tbh. The MFs of today are raising flagship funds >15bn with well over 20bn of total aum. Look at bains fundraising across flagship funds, they are raising smaller funds each time they try which is an indicator of performance. Also its not that they are absolutely tanking & each deal is blowing up its that the funds of similar size 10 years ago have had far more success and that shows in fundraising

 

They have over 100B AUM, the 20 is just PE capital. And I have no idea what you’re saying about the fund sizes consistently getting smaller. They shrunk once after 2008 and have been steadily growing and hitting all their fundraising hard caps since.

 
Most Helpful

PE aum is what matters. If you are recruiting for their pe division who cares how large their real estate fund or credit fund is. Their newest flagship fund is targeting a raise smaller than the 2008 fund too so that is two funds smaller. You have to compare them against their comp set, who raised massive Pe funds and rapidly expanded pe aum since 2008 while bain lagged

 
Controversial

The issue with that logic is not all firms are trying to grow as fast and big as possible. Bain being private has significantly different incentives than the public funds like BX and KKR. TPG is a similar analogue to Bain in this instance, given that they both shrunk after 2008 and have been growing and performing well since. I haven't met a single person outside of WSO who would hesitate at an analyst or associate role at either firm. Saying otherwise means you either run in very different circles or is disingenuous.

Also, whoever is saying 20B for PE dry power is not a lot, that's hilariously wrong. Just look at this year's PEI300 ranking. Bain is #13, ahead of Apollo and Thoma.

 

This is also not a clear consensus. Megafund has never been a clear term, sometimes meaning >5B PE fund size. Pitchbook defines it as >10B fund size, and includes Bain Capital in its list of megafunds.

The poster below also correctly pointed out that Bain is ranked in the top 15 on PEI300, which is ONLY calculated on PE fundraising in the last few years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”