Came across this article (linked below) this morning and found it interesting. Not in PE, so I don’t know why this happened from an “under the hood” perspective, but high level looks like this was a risky fund that faced volatile market conditions. Anyone have insights as to why this may have happened and are there any implications for other similar strategy funds?
(Sorry plugging article from my phone)
| +47 | Secondaries Career Outlook: Comp, Exits & Long-Term Upside? | 13 | 6h |
| +46 | PE to PortCo Chief of Staff | 19 | 23h |
| +45 | Consumer PE is dying/dead? | 10 | 1d |
| +22 | Private Equity Office wear | 11 | 3h |
| +18 | Use Cases For Claude Cowork / Claude Code | 2 | 1d |
| +12 | Post-Banking Seats | 7 | 2d |
| +11 | Graduating Before Junior-Summer PE/Growth Internship — How Should I Approach the Firm? | 3 | 3d |
| +8 | How do I go from underpaid to overpaid | 2 | 5d |
| +7 | JD, MBA related to PE and other Wall Street Jobs | 2 | 3d |
| +7 | Oncycle rumors | 1 | 18h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Article reads that they lost AuM ie; withdrawals rather than losing 90% from investment losses.
Obviously some investment losses are baked in to cause the drop but its not like the fund went from $100 NAV / unit to $10 NAV / unit.
Veniam vel cupiditate commodi dolor saepe. Ad in omnis est reprehenderit nobis voluptatem officiis.
Autem facilis eos blanditiis. Sunt nam animi fugit consequatur officia est omnis. Natus eos soluta ut voluptatibus. Quod commodi velit at maxime.
Est voluptatibus ut illo voluptas quia. Voluptate in et eum qui voluptas impedit iure quaerat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...