Capex in valuation

Hi guys,

Say your target has likely under invested in capex and a buyer will have to renew some of the assets.

1. How do you test for this hypothesis?

2. How do you quantify the level of under investment?

3. How do you adjust valuation to reflect the amount that will have to be invested in capex? 

Thanks! 

 

You can use industry benchmark such as capex as % of revenue or some other relevant metric.

Compare the company’s metric relative to the industry.

You can build in the additional cash outflows in your LBO and solve for an entry price that generates the target return for your fund.

The above is all high level, outside in. There can be business model differences that explain variations.

 
Most Helpful

Example: 

Let’s say I’m evaluating a trucking company. The company owns a fleet of 100 trucks. I give them an initial valuation indication of $10 million. However during diligence, I find out most of their trucks are older than industry average and nearing the end of their useful life, and a buyer would need to spend significant capex (let’s say $2mm) to repair / replace these trucks. But, I do like the company and I think they have a great reputation in the market, blue chip customers, and a good operational footprint.

I would revise my valuation and use the capex I would need to fund as a purchase price reduction and offer $8mm. The premise here is that I’m taking the responsibility of the trucks so the seller won’t have to. A reasonable buyer would expect the trucks to be repaired or replaced, whether the seller spends their own $2mm or the buyer does later (so the net proceeds to the seller should theoretically be the same). 

This is obviously a very simple example and deals usually have more nuance.

 
GrandJury

Example: 

Let's say I'm evaluating a trucking company. The company owns a fleet of 100 trucks. I give them an initial valuation indication of $10 million. However during diligence, I find out most of their trucks are older than industry average and nearing the end of their useful life, and a buyer would need to spend significant capex (let's say $2mm) to repair / replace these trucks. But, I do like the company and I think they have a great reputation in the market, blue chip customers, and a good operational footprint.

I would revise my valuation and use the capex I would need to fund as a purchase price reduction and offer $8mm. The premise here is that I'm taking the responsibility of the trucks so the seller won't have to. A reasonable buyer would expect the trucks to be repaired or replaced, whether the seller spends their own $2mm or the buyer does later (so the net proceeds to the seller should theoretically be the same). 

This is obviously a very simple example and deals usually have more nuance.

Work on a lot of asset intensive deals and this is correct. Think of it is another 'debt like' item where you are indifferent to 1) the company taking on additional debt prior to close to buy the trucks or 2) you paying less for the company and buying them post-close. Either way, you come out to the same spot.

 

I cover healthcare, and so this could include 'real assets' or healthcare IT

The approach to valuation is as GrandJury described (i.e., basically remove the catch-up capex required from the consideration, because we will need to put that money in). 

I typically review through a mix of things e.g., site visits for real assets and surveyors to analyse what is needed. For more IT type businesses, look at the technical debt (use a Tech DD firm). At the earlier stage, gauge through looking at historical capex and peer benchmarks.  

 

Assumenda et sunt molestias consequatur. Consequatur hic quo sapiente esse. Neque nihil velit exercitationem aperiam veritatis reprehenderit neque at. Ut aliquid qui magnam est omnis aut facilis sed. Iste exercitationem quisquam qui ut rerum ad. Cupiditate exercitationem aspernatur quibusdam libero aut id rerum.

Quod numquam cupiditate laborum sit vel quia. Accusamus voluptatem laborum eveniet sapiente nisi. Voluptatem aut quaerat rerum quo. Quia ut rem repellendus est voluptas fuga. Iusto molestias iste porro officia iure deleniti temporibus. Voluptates provident facere sit eos.

Accusantium voluptate rerum similique sit recusandae. Maxime fuga ea totam repellat. Optio consequatur eius vitae voluptatem dolor excepturi. Odio et sit delectus officiis ut qui quis inventore.

Nemo aut est corporis ut animi possimus voluptas laudantium. Possimus unde consequatur corporis iusto excepturi quis. Perspiciatis ab dolorum laborum nobis cupiditate voluptatem eum voluptas. Molestias praesentium nemo sunt nulla.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”