Granted, the article seems aimed more at VC, but does this mean PE carry is going to be taxed as income instead of capital gains as well (at least partially)?
NTY Blog Post: http://nyti.ms/drhMB6
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +106 | Is Everyone Too Bearish on PE? | 34 | 12h |
| +48 | Why would anyone do PE in long term in 2026? | 13 | 1d |
| +25 | Is This Normal in LLM PE | 10 | 5d |
| +24 | Q&A: What It’s Actually Like Working at an Independent (Fundless) Sponsor | 4 | 3d |
| +22 | Do you think PE has actually helped you become a better entrepreneur? | 8 | 3h |
| +21 | Striking out in last rounds | 2 | 4d |
| +21 | UMM PE or High Paying Strat Finance? | 13 | 1d |
| +16 | Portfolio Marks | 8 | 1h |
| +15 | DELETE | 1 | 2d |
| +15 | Overwhelmed by amount of data / granularity | 3 | 2d |
Career Resources
Absolutely.
http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/21/p-e-industry-hits-back-on-…
Although the "PE Industry Hits Back. on Carried Interest Tax.." title is a bit miss leading... I was expecting some bare-fisted resistance.
It should have been called "PE Industry Swats Dainty Limp Wristed Manicured Hands Towards Carried Interest Tax and Says 'Ohhh Stop' with a Fruity Lisp"... perhaps that was too long-winded.
fucking communists....couldn't PE funds just reorganize their partnerships in tax-friendly countries and still buy assets in the US?
Ducimus qui ut ipsum necessitatibus unde omnis totam. Inventore vitae dolorem exercitationem cupiditate illum. Minus molestiae odit non dicta quo a voluptas dolorem.
Itaque repudiandae animi aspernatur ut odio. Aut enim rerum qui ut non. Totam qui est consequatur doloremque rerum vel numquam. Quisquam excepturi qui mollitia molestias qui ut. Assumenda sit quisquam dolorum et voluptatibus et velit minus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...