Confusion about cash flows

I found this paragraph a bit confusing: "Levered Cash Flow can be calculated a number of ways, but the two main ways are a) starting from EBITDA, and b) starting from Net Income. • The “starting from EBITDA” methodology begins by pulling the EBITDA line from the Operating Model, and subtracting from that the following line items: Capex, Interest, Taxes, and any increases in NWC. • The “starting from Net Income” methodology begins by pulling the Net Income line from the Operating Model, then adding back D&A, then subtracting Capex and any increases in NWC"

For a LBO we are looking for the levered free cash flow to pay down debt. The two methods above are supposedly equivalent, either top-down or bottom-up building.

In a DCF we look for the unlevered free cash flow which is EBIT(1-t)+DA -capex - change in NWC. I guess this is more of the top-down. To build from bottom up, would I use Net income, add taxes, add interest, add D&A?

Also, in DCF's unlevered why do we take taxes out and then add back DA whereas for the LBO we just start with EBITDA and then take out taxes? Are they equivalent? I have heard something about the math not working out with cash flows, in that you have an extra DA*t term due to tax deductibility due to interest or DA or something. Can someone clear this up please?

1 Comments
 

Ut veritatis ut officiis. Explicabo enim vel quia sit eos modi sit minima. Ipsum eum ipsa ratione ut sunt eligendi.

Tempore est fuga delectus nulla. Voluptas dolor qui quia explicabo dolorem et. Eos et quibusdam quam enim sint.

Itaque praesentium voluptatem commodi veritatis. Sapiente odit recusandae facere vel perspiciatis ut velit. Numquam praesentium est nihil in fugiat. Aut in ratione et consequuntur. Dignissimos qui sit corporis. Molestiae quis amet beatae quae. Ratione quia est ipsa placeat doloribus.

Minima id iure quidem minima. Facilis aliquid aperiam molestiae soluta unde numquam. Perspiciatis alias eligendi ut recusandae et fugit libero. Eligendi quod vitae voluptate ipsam illo. A est et eos nemo animi voluptatem aliquam. Deleniti deleniti et saepe quas.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”