FCF formula - two formulae are different?

Hi everyone:

This might be a dumb question, but I'm stuck on it and would really appreciate your help.

I'm reading both Breaking Into Wall Street and WSO PE guide, and it seems that they have two formula for FCF calculation that don't 100% tie up. I wanted to check if I misunderstood them...

From BIWS: FCF = CFO - capex From WSO PE guide: FCF = EBIT (1- tax rate) + D&A+ net change in working capital - capex

If these two would be the same, then CFO would need to equal EBIT (1-tax rate) + D&A + net change in working capital. BUT, my understanding is that CFO = net income + D&A + net change in working capital, and net income = EBT (1- tax rate), not EBIT (1-tax rate)

Could some one please enlighten me on this?

Thanks!

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

The first is levered free cash flow, and takes the company’s capital structure (debt and resulting interest expense) into account, which is primarily used in LBOs to see if a company’s profitability / cash flows can support certain debt levels. The second is unlevered and does not take interest into account, which is more commonly used in Equity valuation as it gives an “apples to apples” comparison across various businesses operations

 

The first is levered free cash flow, and takes the company’s capital structure (debt and resulting interest expense) into account, which is primarily used in LBOs to see if a company’s profitability / cash flows can support certain debt levels. The second is unlevered and does not take interest into account, which is more commonly used in Equity valuation as it gives an “apples to apples” comparison across various businesses operations

 

Distinctio doloremque voluptas voluptatem adipisci. Voluptatem ratione non voluptate. Laudantium debitis molestiae consequatur.

Asperiores rerum ratione rerum eaque. Enim et ut rerum omnis velit. Consequatur adipisci et enim quia id.

Quis est facilis minima. Non unde voluptatem velit voluptatem. Fugiat doloribus iusto fugit saepe eveniet inventore.

Aut est temporibus et maxime aut est. Ut praesentium eveniet iusto eos. Similique distinctio sit maiores voluptatem sit ut doloribus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.2%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (236) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (40) $79
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”