Financing EBITDA - why would it be different from actual EBITDA?

Hi guys:

This might be a stupid question, but I was wondering if anyone can tell me why financing EBITDA can be different from actual EBITDA please? What usually causes the difference? Why would financing EBITDA not be either LTM actual EBITDA or NTM EBITDA provided by management?

Thanks!

7 Comments
 

One reason is that in any deal (especially when the seller is a PEG exiting a platform investment), the seller often tries to get credit for a larger earnings base with a series of EBITDA add-backs, run-rate adjustments, etc. At the time of the transaction, they are essentially trying to get credit for growth initiatives that they put in action and have not realized yet. Lot of IBs trying to pitch how they can sell the forward earnings base these days to get maximum value.

 
Most Helpful

For debt (you have a compliance certificate): 1) Lenders will allow you to add prospective synergies / cost saves fully 2) Typically you will run-rate acquisitions but (unless they are material) you won't run-rate out divestitures and no one cares 3) Certain relatively aggressive industry specific add-backs won't be allowed in the compliance cert. For example in certain salesforce driven industries you may subsidize ramping sales staff and add the comp subsidyback for marketing (i.e. CIM) ebitda. Lenders don't allow that

Generally from what i've seen financing ebitda is kind of in-line with sell-side ebitda (read: aggressive)

Also rule of thumb, financing ebitda is NEVER ntm. It can be run-rate (different from NTM). Run-rate would refer to acquisitions. I haven't covered saas so idk if contract wins are added typically.

 

Perferendis provident laborum sunt eos. Est repellendus quis voluptates debitis optio qui fuga. Aperiam nihil velit quidem numquam modi. Molestias dolorum est neque voluptates sequi minus aut.

Ut explicabo magnam vel unde voluptates aut ducimus voluptatem. Quod laboriosam totam nam esse possimus aut.

Tempora vel ea est aut vel a. Magni animi quia iste. In qui nesciunt iusto perspiciatis voluptatem rem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”