26 Comments
 

Fake news. I’ve seen 3.4 and 3.5 get great placements. All about crushing the technicals and having great IB deal experience. Saying there is a “cutoff” is simply not true

Nicolas
 
Most Helpful

crymeariver123

Fake news. I’ve seen 3.4 and 3.5 get great placements. All about crushing the technicals and having great IB deal experience. Saying there is a “cutoff” is simply not true

Can't crush the technicals if you get cut prior to getting an interview and what deal experience if participating in on-cycle.    There definitely is an implicit cut-off when doing resume reviews.  If its on-cycle, a a 3.5 kid from U-Miami is super easy to cut for example.  This goes away as you get more senior but at the basically no-experience out of college stage, easy to cut people. 

Sure some people got great placements with lower GPAs but how many places did they get dinged at the resume screen / HH screen stage for their GPA?   My firm gets an excel from our HH that shows name, firm, group, school, GPA, test scores, and we rank from there to look at resumes.   

For OP, I'd stay above a 3.8 if you can.   

 

No one has great deal experience for oncycle when they graduated college 2 months ago. The only data points you really have are group, school and GPA. Maybe test scores from 5 years ago. When you have to prune 100 highly qualified BB/EB candidates to 30, GPA is just about the easiest thing to rank on.

Of course those 3.4/3.5s can get placements, but it's a much harder hill to climb and as I said, won't check the box everywhere.

 

Less relevant if you have the work experience. Anyone looking to do PE very early career or summer rotational will need a 3.7+ to be competitive anywhere big enough to hire that demographic.

 
Funniest

Any PE firm that honestly cares about your college GPA or test scores from 5+ years ago is a beta firm. Understand if GPA is used as an initial filter because of so many candidates to decide if they give you an interview, but if any PE firm is honesty making final hiring decisions after modeling interview, paper LBO, walking though deal experience, etc. on 3.5 vs 3.9 GPA, that’s beta AF

 

I had a 3.5 from a semi-target and a relatively no-name IB and got a solid MM offer - but I will definitely say that it counted against me in HH screens and resume pulls. Had to network a little bit to get into the process for the MM. but once you’re in face to face interviews, I think it all comes down to technicals, behaviorals, and mainly deal exp.

I even got asked in a final round for another MM/LMM shop why my GPA was so low, so important to craft a narrative if that happens.

 

How long after graduation are a lot of these metrics still relevant? 

I came across a hedge fund that was looking for a new analyst. Amongst the typical requirements (2-3 years IB, PE, S&T, etc...) They wanted college gpa and SAT/ACT scores. If you're 3 years into your professional career, you're safely 7-8 years removed from when you took those tests. If universities won't even accept those scores due to age, why are the relevant for a job application?

 

Really only matters for initial screen. After that, you’ll will just be evaluated on your interviews + technical skills. Most firms have a 3.7 or 3.5 GPA cut-off so just stay above that to avoid the extra work of having to network more, etc. to get a seat in the process. It’s a competitive market and GPA is an easy metric firms will use even 5+ years into your career

 

Rem et quo laborum esse qui. Quasi ut dolorem qui architecto quo amet perferendis quia. Exercitationem nobis maiores harum enim aut officiis.

Exercitationem dignissimos qui velit impedit autem dolore. Expedita fugit aspernatur voluptatibus ut adipisci ut sit. Sit eum quam sit minus consequatur praesentium. Optio ullam reprehenderit ducimus atque. Et accusamus ut suscipit excepturi ratione quia rerum.

Commodi et aut ut labore voluptatem velit et. Qui neque ut officiis nemo. Aspernatur qui rerum voluptatibus sint magnam commodi dolore. Ad pariatur quaerat aut amet et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”