How do you value technology businesses with no revenue but great tech?

Consider a couple of recent events:

  1. [Fundraising example] Unspecified open-source database raises a Series C @ ~$500mm; typically database lifecycle is 10 years, company is about 5 years in and finishing up most of the actual "tech building" and now is "company building" beyond engineers plus bare bones S&M / G&A

  2. [M&A example] Snowflake pays $800mm earlier this year to acquire Streamlit to help build their catalog of data applications; company has <$100k in revenue and will contribute $25mm in costs according to most recent earnings call


In these transactions, how do you value these businesses if their is neither an EBITDA or Revenue multiple to go off of?

 
Most Helpful

I have not read anything about Snowflake and Streamlit, but for acquiring companies with minimal revenue but a strong tech platform, we often look at the synergy opportunities. Maybe right now, our target is doing 100K in revenue, but if we believe that it can increase combined sales by $100M over the next years because it's a strong tech plug and play acquisition, we can value it that way. We also look at defensive plays - if we do not acquire this company and our competitors develop these capabilities with their own acquisitions or organic development, what market share may we lose? What is the value at risk?

 

Just to add to this, there's two other methods of which I'm aware:

1) For something like your first example where there are active customers that aren't being monetized, you can do a comparable analysis except with users instead of financial metrics (e.g. this peer trades at X multiple of TEV/MAUs)

2) For strategic acquisitions, we often look at cost to build the product in-house... it would take X engineers Y years and they would cost Z dollars per annum. You can just multiply all that and add a premium for the fact that you get the product immediately instead of Y years later. 

 

Nihil laudantium aut voluptatem non unde illo. Est sit at magni et repellendus. Vitae eligendi consequatur ipsa soluta ducimus eum. Et ullam consectetur non perspiciatis. Aut reprehenderit architecto reprehenderit id recusandae fugiat maxime.

Cupiditate est veritatis est nobis quod fugiat laborum. Unde ab totam ea nobis. Minima ut tempora ut quia quas. Dolorem voluptatem quam ab aperiam iste et quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”