How does the PE partner track work?
I often hear that people are aiming for post MBA "partner track VP roles." Are these roles a direct path to partner, unless you really fuck up? Or is it still very hard to become a partner in this position?
I often hear that people are aiming for post MBA "partner track VP roles." Are these roles a direct path to partner, unless you really fuck up? Or is it still very hard to become a partner in this position?
| +27 | Negotiating title for VP role? | 15 | 3h |
| +22 | How to explain short stint on resume | 3 | 1d |
| +17 | Being honest in Interviews? | 1 | 3d |
| +16 | Managers Starting Independent Sponsor Vehicles | 3 | 5d |
| +14 | Does founder experience help or hurt in buyside recruiting? | 6 | 3d |
| +14 | Choose UMM PE or AI Corpdev role | 4 | 2d |
| +12 | Are industry conferences worth it for proprietary deal sourcing? | 3 | 1d |
| +11 | Secondaries Exit Opportunities | 2 | 4d |
| +11 | JPM Morgan Private Capital vs. Mid-Tier IB | 6 | 23h |
| +11 | Business class flight tickets standard? | 7 | 11m |
Career Resources
It's very hard to become a partner at any well-known fund. Track record, sourcing ability, personality, fit with firm culture, office politics, current number of partners all play a big part. A lot of funds will advertise "partner track" but the reality is that the guys at the top don't want to share economics.
this is why you see guys find a niche then move to a smaller shop who’s lacking in that niche. faster track to partner than the bigger shops.
Lol "partner track" is what they use to advertise the role...honestly probably popularized by recruiters. Going from VP to partner is no easy feat at any fund.
I’ll add that the difference is generally stagnation in current role (take a ticket) as opposed to being kicked out (like pre-MBAs)
Building on this, is PE not up and out like banking, or will you be asked to leave after a few years at VP?
It mostly denotes a role that doesn't have a set expiration date. So in associate recruiting, "non-partner track" would mean you get kicked out after 2 or 3 years regardless of performance
Thanks for the quick and insightful answers. On a side note, is it harder to make partner in PE or MD in banking?
Partner in PE without hesitation. Lots (but not all) of banking MDs just grinding their way to the top. Partners in PE all earned it, either with deal sourcing ability, fundraising ability, or both.
Edit: assuming the monkey shit is some bitter banking MDs realizing they grinded for years to be wage slaves forever! Throw all the MS you want if it makes you feel better :)
Forgot one thing there, actually having good investment judgement...
While I don’t doubt that is this true at some firms, i don’t think it is the rule. My experience is that firms with healthy cultures and good returns are focused on growing the franchise. In general it is hard to grow your AUM and the value of the GP without having really strong junior partners.
Ut saepe voluptatem dolorem. Eos dolor facere corrupti. Quo harum eligendi et ut est dolore nam eos. Reiciendis ut hic et minus vel provident. Explicabo sit laborum quo. Cumque optio et architecto delectus aut et expedita.
Provident quia non dolor possimus. Eaque autem est minima. Sed autem vel beatae. Suscipit tempora est et.
Cupiditate ut ab nihil consequatur adipisci. Corrupti id ad itaque. Ut fuga nihil nesciunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...