Investment Idea

Okay I need input to see if this has merit. I work at a credit fund and we came up with this investment thesis today, but need to test it.

There are a variety of PE/PC professionals out there that need to make GP commitments but don't have the ongoing cash to do it.

What if we provided 50% of the original cost basis of your commitment as a loan which you then use to finance your new commitment? This would be structured as preferred equity without a maturity date and we would simply receive an ongoing pref rate (no cash pay), preference over all cashflows, and a minimum return of 1.3x. cost of capital would be mid teens, but once again, no cash pay requirement.

Who are my competitors? Keep on my mind my collateral isn't your carry, it's the commitment you made to your fund.

13 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some insights to consider for your investment thesis:

Key Considerations:

  1. Market Need:

    • There is a recognized need among PE/PC professionals for financing GP commitments due to cash flow constraints.
  2. Investment Structure:

    • Offering 50% of the original cost basis as a loan.
    • Structured as preferred equity without a maturity date.
    • Ongoing preferred rate with no cash pay requirement.
    • Preference over all cashflows.
    • Minimum return of 1.3x.
  3. Cost of Capital:

    • Mid-teens, with no cash pay requirement.

Competitors:

  1. Traditional Banks:

    • May offer loans but typically require cash pay and have stricter collateral requirements.
  2. Specialized Lenders:

    • Firms that specialize in providing capital to PE/PC professionals for GP commitments.
    • These might include private credit funds or niche financial institutions.
  3. Internal Fund Solutions:

    • Some PE firms may have internal mechanisms to support GP commitments, reducing the need for external financing.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Competitive Advantages:

    • No cash pay requirement, which is attractive for professionals with cash flow constraints.
    • Preference over all cashflows ensures a secure position in the capital structure.
    • Minimum return of 1.3x provides a clear return target.
  • Risks and Mitigation:

    • Risk: Default risk if the underlying fund underperforms.
    • Mitigation: Thorough due diligence on the fund's performance and management team.
    • Risk: Market volatility affecting the value of the commitment.
    • Mitigation: Diversification across multiple funds and sectors.

Investment Thesis Validation:

  • Questions to Consider:

    • "How does this company make money?"
    • "Why does this company make money?"
    • "Will this company continue to make money in the future?"
    • "What do you have to believe for this investment to make money?"
  • Framework:

    • Transaction dynamic.
    • Market and business model.
    • Competitive position.
    • Management team.
    • Financial performance.
    • Investment thesis and value creation measures.
    • Valuation and structure.
    • Exit and return.
    • Risk and reward.

Conclusion:

Your investment thesis appears to have merit, especially given the unique structure and the lack of cash pay requirements. However, thorough due diligence and competitive analysis are crucial to ensure the viability and attractiveness of this offering in the market.

Sources: PE professional, what's your process while judging an investment?, PE professional, what's your process while judging an investment?, Q&A: Private Equity Fund of funds - GP Evaluation/ Due diligence, Reflections from year 4 as an equity analyst, Q&A: PE Secondaries Principal

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Is the idea to provide pref instead of a debt RCF that most funds offer? I'm not sure how other banks work but the w/r/t the bank my firm uses the line of credit is personally guaranteed by me (i.e. it's not just secured against my investment). I think this would be compelling but would you really want to offer this to all investments in a fund unilaterally? Seems like a poor risk-reward for you.  

 

Non recourse. Collateral would be you need an existing fund commitment and we take a pref on that and the new commitment. Cost of capital is 15-18% all PIK but structured as pref equity

 

Pretty sure Blue Owl did this for I Squared when the founders who essentially controlled the entire fund expanded the ownership out to the rest of the partners and did it in the form of a loan of sorts... like pretty much giving the previously not-staked-in partners equity in the form of loan, but I think the partners were the ones bounded into it. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, anyone who is more familiar with this.

 
Most Helpful

Mid teens cost of capital when most funds are probably run rating that on an unlevered basis is going to be hard. The funds that do have stellar performance arelikely going to have agreements with private banks to offer lending on much more attractive terms so you’ll end up loaning to mid market funds where you need to take a bet on performance. If most ppl think 2 x Moic over 5 years is the bogey then I think they wouldn’t be better off with a mid teens cost of capital pref

Interesting idea tho

 

Animi quia suscipit non. Sed nobis aut et animi quod ut. Accusamus consequatur illum quia architecto ad. Pariatur aliquam qui qui est aut est.

Assumenda autem earum aut quod rerum. Sit eos in eligendi nihil. Qui pariatur praesentium harum qui natus nihil est et. Ducimus illum quibusdam et ea. Occaecati iure atque tenetur dolor modi. Deleniti et assumenda aut nihil non aut temporibus libero. Et quisquam adipisci voluptate. Error est ut fugit necessitatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”