Hi Folks -
I wanted to see how people typically approach these questions:
1) Would you rather own a bad company in a good industry or a good company in a bad industry?
2) Would rather own a good company in a great industry or a great company in a good industry?
Thank you!
| +58 | Working on Juneteenth | 32 | 17h |
| +24 | From Public Equities to Private Equities | 4 | 4d |
| +22 | Hardest time I have ever seen to be a GP | 3 | 18h |
| +18 | Weighing exit from LMM PC/PE | 1 | 3d |
| Search Fund Internship Vs. Internship at my family's Family Office | 10 | 13h | |
| +15 | KKR comp for Principal | 10 | 6h |
| +14 | Anyone have intel on Aterian Investment Partners? Culture, Comp, Performance? | 9 | 4d |
| +13 | Healthcare PE | 6 | 1d |
| +12 | LMM groups within larger platforms? | 1 | 5d |
| +12 | How to Get on Career Track / Stay Post ASO years | 4 | 1h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
1) I'm assuming you mean bad company in good industry vs good company in bad industry. I think I would lean towards bad company in good industry on principle because it's relatively easier to improve a company tactically (improve operations) than to improve a company strategically (pivot industries). However, I would caveat to this, it also depends on the market structures of each of these industries. If it turns out that the bad company operates in a high barriers to entry "good" industry that's already very consolidated (monopoly/oligopoly) and they are not a part of the "winners" I could potentially prefer a good company in a bad industry with the thinking being that both the loser in a consolidated good industry and operators in a bad industry are doomed to zero economic profits in the long-term, so maybe I'd prefer the one that's better operated.
2) Good company great industry for a similar reason to the above, additionally, the "good" company could be relatively cheaper than the "great" company with more room for growth.
1) Bad company in a good industry. Listen to what Buffett says - When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact.
2) Depends on many factors, I would start probing the interviewer with questions like are they thinking about any one specific industry or business model. Good company in a great industry = you can have multiple players who win and capture share. Industry growth can carry the industry participants even if product's aren't differentiated / have a competitive advantage. Great company in a good industry = over the long-term can still outperform (i.e. think cyclicals)
But defining a GREAT industry really comes down to 1) rate of change in the industry, 2) supply / demand dynamics which in turns drives pricing trends and growth, 3) barriers to entry, and 4) nature of relationships between the customer and business
Iusto labore modi omnis eos quam accusantium ut. A consequatur eaque ut fuga. Earum nisi repudiandae eum et. Ut eos aspernatur facere sint. Ipsum sed sit dolores sit. Sed quo adipisci ipsam eaque assumenda omnis sint. Eos laboriosam cupiditate aliquam distinctio. Reprehenderit quis consectetur laborum sint.
Veniam enim repellat et. Quae dicta consectetur eos est.
Tempora aut voluptas laboriosam nihil quidem quod a. Error et consequatur et dolore eum ducimus corporis. Officiis non delectus rem quam corrupti illum nam. Impedit fugit aut quia facilis. Numquam inventore repellat qui id iusto tempore alias quo. Adipisci provident molestiae corrupti pariatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Molestiae id ratione et rerum officiis iure. Error rerum praesentium qui illo. Ea omnis incidunt voluptatum et sit repudiandae ut. Tempora provident quia est non eos sed soluta necessitatibus.