I've got some general questions about 'Funds of Funds'

Forgive me, but I'm a newbie to finance. I graduated last year with a humanities degree and I'm taking some time off right now to think about grad school/career options (while working a non-finance job on the side). I've done a lot of research online, and I've read some vault career guides (hedge funds, private equity, venture capital, investment banking, investment management, management consulting, etc.), so I'm starting to feel like I have at least a basic understanding of the financial sector as a whole.....and there's something that's striking me as odd - 'Funds of Funds'.

Let me get this straight - Hedge Funds and Private Equity Firms hire the brightest and hardest working people on the planet. These people then spend almost 100 hours a week looking over thousands and thousands of businesses/properties in search of value. These people then identify great ideas, and need to raise money to invest in those ideas - this is where funds of funds come into play.

Now, Funds of Funds. The people at these firms. Instead of looking at thousands and thousands of businesses/properties for value, all these people need to do is look at the top 10 or so private equity funds, and then pick the top 5 or so to invest their clients' money in!? Excuse me for sounding like an asshole here...but that sounds like an incredibly easy way to make a ton of money (and even a safer way, with the diversication of 5 or so different top funds).

I feel like I (a recent humanities graduate) could run a fund of fund successfully right now. If someone gave me a billion dollars, I could look up the top 5 performing private equity funds of 2010, give each 200 million, and then collect on the 20% gains (200 million) in 5 or so years.

I mean, I guess I just don't really get it!? It seems like such an incredibly easy way to make a ton of money!? What are the drawbacks!? Is it hard to raise money for a fund of fund? - it still seems much more profitable, and almost as secure, as the common mutual fund. Is it hard to make much in the way of management fee's? - I'm sure you wouldn't make as much as someone at a HF or PE firm...but for the amount of work you need to do - next to nothing - it seems like you'd still be getting a real nice slice of the pie.

Hopefully there are some people here with knowledge of funds of funds, or maybe even some people working for them. I'd like to learn as much as possible about them. Who are some of the top players? What do they look for in employees? How much do their employees make in comparision to other top financial professionals? Does anyone know of any good links or books where I could better educate myself?

Thank you in advance for any help!

 

"Now, Funds of Funds. The people at these firms. Instead of looking at thousands and thousands of businesses/properties for value, all these people need to do is look at the top 10 or so private equity funds, and then pick the top 5 or so to invest their clients' money in!? Excuse me for sounding like an asshole here...but that sounds like an incredibly easy way to make a ton of money (and even a safer way, with the diversication of 5 or so different top funds). "

past performance is by no way an absolute indicator for future performance. ..

Furthermore if you look at the sheer size of the assets of the top players (e.g. alpinvest) you realize they cant just split the pot and give it to five funds. Especially if those five funds run the same risk. At a FoF, from my understanding, they will monitor the strategy chosen against what was agreed to. They will run their own risk models (which obviously are different as they are a portfolio of funds). Moreover people will analyse assumptions, projections etc. of the direct investment people. All in all you try to find the best split between funds to invest in according to your own assumptions and then actively "manage & monitor" this investment. At the end of the day, you just add a second fee layer for lazy people.

Thats at least my understanding.

 
Best Response

Deleniti repellat voluptate ea dolorem corrupti nihil nulla. Quia esse debitis animi consequatur voluptatem. Incidunt rerum nulla praesentium aut ut. Quia voluptas rerum enim maiores tenetur sunt vel.

Odio enim suscipit iure qui voluptatem. Tenetur rerum reiciendis voluptates explicabo. Voluptatibus quo quo et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”